FYI
Fairmont State (FS) Preview
FS has about 3,300 students (as of 2023). They have a very deep and talented team, with strong inside and outside players. It is purported that FS has the most resources (as in NIL, also known as pay-to-play) in the MEC to acquire players.
They have 3 former D1 players from Marshall, Univ. Md BC, and Wright State. They are loaded with athletic, tall, long players, who can score at all three levels as well as quick guards. They have the former Concord big man and former MEC Defensive Player of the Pear in Diop.
They have quality depth; there are 8 players that play16 minutes or more and no one plays over 29 minutes.
Apparently, they have designed their roster to combat the fatigue generated by WLU and to score a high percentage of open looks from three or attack the rim when they break the trap.
Fairmont State (FS) Game Plan
The FS strategy seemed to be:
Keys to the WLU Game
FS is a very athletic, tall, and talented team with ex-D1 players, that plays excellent defense and who can score at all three levels. They present numerous matchup problems against the shorter (overall) WLU team. When one plays such a strong team, WLU cannot have a subpar shooting performance (like WLU had in the first meeting) and must keep FS near their average shooting %. WLU cannot get dominated on the boards by this much taller team (unlike the first meeting).
Often, victory often depends on a combination of 3 factors – true shooting %, offensive rebounding, and points off turnover margin. Teams that are deficient in one factor can win by dominating in one or more other factors, with the objective of getting sufficiently more FGA or FTA to offset a lower true shooting percentage, resulting in higher points per possession.
Areas for Improvement for WLU
A Dummy’s Observations on MEC WLU vs Fairmont 3/8/26
WLU 93 – Fairmont 88
Fairmont State (FS) Preview
FS has about 3,300 students (as of 2023). They have a very deep and talented team, with strong inside and outside players. It is purported that FS has the most resources (as in NIL, also known as pay-to-play) in the MEC to acquire players.
They have 3 former D1 players from Marshall, Univ. Md BC, and Wright State. They are loaded with athletic, tall, long players, who can score at all three levels as well as quick guards. They have the former Concord big man and former MEC Defensive Player of the Pear in Diop.
They have quality depth; there are 8 players that play16 minutes or more and no one plays over 29 minutes.
Apparently, they have designed their roster to combat the fatigue generated by WLU and to score a high percentage of open looks from three or attack the rim when they break the trap.
| Team Stats (26-5, 17-3) | ||
| Overall Team Statistics | ||
| Statistic | Fairmont St. | Opponents |
| Scoring | ||
| Total Points | 2811 | 2307 |
| Points Per Game | 90.7 | 74.4 |
| Scoring Margin | 16.3 | -- |
| Shooting | ||
| FG: Made-Attempted | 980-1963 | 781-1877 |
| FG: Percentage | 0.499 | 0.416 |
| FG: Per Game | 31.6 | 25.2 |
| 3PT: Made-Attempted | 336-854 | 282-814 |
| 3PT: Percentage | 0.393 | 0.346 |
| 3PT: Per Game | 10.8 | 9.1 |
| FT: Made-Attempted | 515-716 | 463-627 |
| FT: Percentage | 0.719 | 0.738 |
| FT: Per Game | 16.6 | 14.9 |
| Rebounding | ||
| Total | 1227 | 978 |
| Per Game | 39.6 | 31.5 |
| Margin | 8 | -- |
| Assists | ||
| Total | 547 | 369 |
| Per Game | 17.6 | 11.9 |
| Turnovers | ||
| Total | 385 | 430 |
| Per Game | 12.4 | 13.9 |
| Margin | 1.5 | -- |
| Assist/Turnover Ratio | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| Points Off Turnovers | 18.9 | 13.3 |
| Steals | ||
| Total | 269 | 209 |
| Per Game | 8.7 | 6.7 |
| Blocks | ||
| Total | 118 | 71 |
| Per Game | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| Attendance | ||
| Total | 11850 | 4295 |
| Per Game | 15-790 | 13-330 |
The FS strategy seemed to be:
- PASSED – Mix up their defenses, switching between zone and man-to-man. In the first half, the zone slowed down the WLU offense, as they took additional time to get bell passed into the middle of the zone at the foul line. Fairmont is an excellent defensive team with their length and quickness.
- PASSED – Get the ball inside to their taller players. Fairmont got 52 points in the paint, compared to 32 for WLU.
| Stat | FS Season Avg | FS avg for WLU game | WLU season Avg | WLU avg for FS game | |
| FG% | 49.9% | 49.2% | 50% | 54.4^% | |
| 3FG% | 39.3% | 26.1% | 34.9% | 44.8% | |
| # 3FG Made | 10.8 | 6 | 10.6 | 13 | |
| FT% | 71.9% | 69.2% | 70.4% | 78.3% | |
| # FT Made | 16.6 | 18 | 19.1 | 18 |
- PASSED – Limit the turnover margin. FS had 19 turnovers while forcing 23 WLU turnovers. FS got 23 points off turnovers to 19 points for WLU.
- PASSED– Dominate rebounding, by leveraging their height and strength advantage. FS won offensive rebounds 11-6 and overall rebounds 33-32. FS won second chance points 12-5.
- FAILED– Shoot their average FG % and 3FG%. FS shot only 26% 3FG, far below their elite 39.3% average.
Keys to the WLU Game
FS is a very athletic, tall, and talented team with ex-D1 players, that plays excellent defense and who can score at all three levels. They present numerous matchup problems against the shorter (overall) WLU team. When one plays such a strong team, WLU cannot have a subpar shooting performance (like WLU had in the first meeting) and must keep FS near their average shooting %. WLU cannot get dominated on the boards by this much taller team (unlike the first meeting).
Often, victory often depends on a combination of 3 factors – true shooting %, offensive rebounding, and points off turnover margin. Teams that are deficient in one factor can win by dominating in one or more other factors, with the objective of getting sufficiently more FGA or FTA to offset a lower true shooting percentage, resulting in higher points per possession.
- True Shooting % - WLU 69.3% FS 57.6%, aided by cold FS 3FG (26.1%) and elite WLU 3FG (44.8%). This disparity overcame the fact that FS got 8 more FGA.
- Offensive Rebounding – FS 11 WLU 6
- Turnovers – FS 19 – WLU 23. – very unusual for WLU
- Points off Turnovers – WLU 20 FS 19
Areas for Improvement for WLU
- End-of-game player situational awareness. WLU committed 7 turnovers in the last 4 minutes of the game on poor decisions or soft passes. I wonder if the fatigue from the previous strenuous 2 games was finally taking their toll, in addition to a highly energetic FS defense.
- Players are still telegraphing passes and throwing passes too casually.
- Playoff-level teams like FS will strip the ball when WLU tries to split defenders on the dribble in half-court. FS had quick, active hands.
Comment