Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Latest from schnautza in General Discussion has the following:

    1. NW
    2. Washburn
    3. Southern Nazarene
    4. Northern St
    5. St Cloud
    6. Mo Southern
    7. Southern Arkansas
    8. Mankato

    Will be interesting to see how it shakes out with Regional Rankings tomorrow.

    Comment


    • #92
      Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

      Originally posted by NWHoops View Post
      Latest from schnautza in General Discussion has the following:

      1. NW
      2. Washburn
      3. Southern Nazarene
      4. Northern St
      5. St Cloud
      6. Mo Southern
      7. Southern Arkansas
      8. Mankato

      Will be interesting to see how it shakes out with Regional Rankings tomorrow.
      13.40 for Mankato
      13.36 for Lincoln (9th)
      13.35 for SE Oklahoma (10th)

      Pretty close stuff at this point...

      Comment


      • #93
        Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

        My guess...

        1. Northwest
        2. Northern
        3. Washburn
        4. Missouri Southern
        5. Southern Nazarene
        6. St. Cloud
        7. Mankato
        8. Wayne

        Just going off different things I've found. Dont expect to be correct.

        Comment


        • #94
          Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

          Originally posted by NWHoops View Post
          Latest from schnautza in General Discussion has the following:

          1. NW
          2. Washburn
          3. Southern Nazarene
          4. Northern St
          5. St Cloud
          6. Mo Southern
          7. Southern Arkansas
          8. Mankato

          Will be interesting to see how it shakes out with Regional Rankings tomorrow.
          No lie, I was really hoping Augie's win against the Mavericks this past weekend would knock them out of the Regional discussion. Sorry Mav fans. You guys are my favorite people on here (besides wscsuperfan), I'm just not a huge fan of MSU's program itself.

          Comment


          • #95
            Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

            Originally posted by NWHoops View Post
            Latest from schnautza in General Discussion has the following:

            1. NW
            2. Washburn
            3. Southern Nazarene
            4. Northern St
            5. St Cloud
            6. Mo Southern
            7. Southern Arkansas
            8. Mankato

            Will be interesting to see how it shakes out with Regional Rankings tomorrow.
            Dislike

            Comment


            • #96
              Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

              Originally posted by NSU4LIFE View Post
              My guess...

              1. Northwest
              2. Northern
              3. Washburn
              4. Missouri Southern
              5. Southern Nazarene
              6. St. Cloud
              7. Mankato
              8. Wayne

              Just going off different things I've found. Dont expect to be correct.

              Comment


              • #97
                Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

                Lindenwood takes down Lincoln 86-82

                Comment


                • #98
                  Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

                  Originally posted by NSU4LIFE View Post
                  Lindenwood takes down Lincoln 86-82
                  Maybe nsic could get a fourth team in...

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

                    Big weekend for Wayne. Mankato is on the road so should sweep. ;)

                    I hate this, and it is a stretch given the ten losses already but USF or Augie could slip on in (potentially, though a long shot) it will take a lot of help from other teams losing. If the committee is true to form, I dont see more than one GAC team getting in simply based on the history. Is it fair? Not totally but who knows.

                    Comment

                    Ad3

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X