Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Performance Indicators 2017-18

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Performance Indicators 2017-18

    I know these mean absolutely nothing after only 3 days of play, but I just wanted to get this thread started. If you don't understand what these numbers mean, check out the threads from past seasons. There's a lot of discussion on what they mean and how I calculate them.

    16 teams have played games against D2 opponents so far. Looks like the next countable games are Nov 10 when the rest of the country kicks off their schedules.


    1 Augustana Central NSIC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 75.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    2 Upper Iowa Central NSIC 3-0 100.00% 15.00 22.22% 74.07% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    3 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 14.50 75.00% 25.00% 1-0 100.00%
    4 Thomas Jefferson East CACC 2-1 66.67% 14.00 44.44% 55.56% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    5 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    5 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 1-0 100.00%
    7 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 50.00% 44.44% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    7 Point Loma West PWC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 50.00% 44.44% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    9 Palm Beach Atlantic South IND 1-2 33.33% 11.00 66.67% 40.74% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    10 Indiana (Pa.) Atlantic PSAC 0-2 0.00% 10.00 100.00% 0.00% 0-1 0.00%
    10 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 10.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    10 St. Thomas Aquinas East ECC 0-2 0.00% 10.00 100.00% 0.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    10 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 0-1 0.00% 10.00 100.00% 22.22% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    10 Saint Leo South SSC 1-2 33.33% 10.00 44.44% 51.85% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    10 Humboldt State West CCAA 1-2 33.33% 10.00 55.56% 44.44% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    16 Montevallo Southeast PBC 0-2 0.00% 8.50 75.00% 25.00% 0-1 0.00%

    Secondary motive for posting so early:
    This is probably the only point in the season that we'll see USI ahead of Ferris and Findlay. The teams they beat will drastically improve from their 0-2 starts.

  • #2
    Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

    7 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 18.00 37.50% 65.63% 2-0 100.00%
    12 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 17.50 37.50% 68.75% 1-0 100.00%
    14 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 16.50 25.00% 75.00% 2-0 100.00%
    25 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 16.25 31.25% 71.88% 2-0 100.00%
    26 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 75.00% 2-0 100.00%
    26 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 75.00% 2-0 100.00%
    26 Hillsdale Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 71.88% 2-0 100.00%
    36 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 75.00% 28.13% 1-1 50.00%
    36 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 75.00% 25.00% 1-1 50.00%
    60 Lake Erie Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 14.50 75.00% 25.00% 1-1 50.00%
    69 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 2-2 50.00% 14.00 68.75% 35.94% 2-1 66.67%
    71 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 75.00% 37.50% 1-1 50.00%
    93 Truman State Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    93 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    115 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 37.50% 65.63% 1-1 50.00%
    115 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    115 Maryville Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    115 Salem International Midwest IND 1-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 1-0 100.00%
    158 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    158 Lewis Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    158 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    158 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    158 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    193 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 1-3 25.00% 10.00 56.25% 53.13% 1-3 25.00%
    193 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 10.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    193 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 10.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    218 Quincy Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 28.13% 0-2 0.00%
    218 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    218 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 9.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    218 Malone Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 9.00 25.00% 71.88% 1-1 50.00%
    218 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    249 Ohio Dominican Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 8.50 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    256 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    Teams with no D2 games so far:
    Walsh
    Drury
    Davis & Elkins
    Missouri S&T
    Oakland City
    McKendree
    Ohio Valley

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

      Thanks for doing this again schnautza!

      Note:
      Findlay, Hillsdale, Lake Erie, Ohio Dominican and Walsh are no longer in the GLIAC.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

        Originally posted by ABjo View Post
        Thanks for doing this again schnautza!

        Note:
        Findlay, Hillsdale, Lake Erie, Ohio Dominican and Walsh are no longer in the GLIAC.
        Thanks - I knew that but forgot to fix it in my spreadsheet. It'll be correct in the next update.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

          Since I'm headed out of town tonight and all weekend to the Twin Cities, I'll post an update today.
          7 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 18.33 50.00% 56.48% 3-0 100.00%
          8 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 18.00 45.83% 53.13% 2-0 100.00%
          12 Findlay Midwest GMAC 3-0 100.00% 17.67 50.56% 59.81% 2-0 100.00%
          15 Drury Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 17.00 33.33% 66.67% 1-0 100.00%
          16 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 3-0 100.00% 16.67 27.78% 74.07% 3-0 100.00%
          27 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 16.25 33.75% 70.56% 2-0 100.00%
          28 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 83.33% 2-0 100.00%
          40 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 75.00% 29.38% 1-1 50.00%
          40 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 83.33% 20.83% 1-1 50.00%
          51 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 3-0 100.00% 14.67 16.67% 71.53% 3-0 100.00%
          51 Truman State Midwest GLVC 3-0 100.00% 14.67 22.22% 77.78% 3-0 100.00%
          55 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 14.50 75.00% 26.39% 1-1 50.00%
          55 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 14.50 75.00% 45.83% 1-1 50.00%
          63 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 2-2 50.00% 14.00 72.92% 31.77% 2-1 66.67%
          71 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 2-1 66.67% 13.67 50.00% 56.48% 2-1 66.67%
          90 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
          120 Maryville Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
          120 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
          120 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 45.83% 53.13% 1-1 50.00%
          146 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 41.67% 68.06% 1-1 50.00%
          154 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 1-2 33.33% 11.33 61.11% 52.78% 1-2 33.33%
          177 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 11.11% 0-2 0.00%
          177 Lewis Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
          177 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
          177 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 11.11% 0-2 0.00%
          177 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
          198 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 10.00 25.00% 73.61% 1-1 50.00%
          198 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 10.00 16.67% 75.00% 2-1 66.67%
          198 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 1-3 25.00% 10.00 56.25% 58.33% 1-3 25.00%
          198 Malone Midwest GMAC 2-1 66.67% 10.00 16.67% 81.71% 2-1 66.67%
          198 Salem International Midwest IND 1-1 50.00% 10.00 33.33% 54.17% 1-1 50.00%
          226 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 0-1 0.00% 9.00 100.00% 11.11% 0-1 0.00%
          226 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 83.33% 16.67% 0-2 0.00%
          226 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 83.33% 20.83% 0-2 0.00%
          256 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 0-1 0.00% 8.00 66.67% 33.33% 0-1 0.00%
          256 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-1 0.00% 8.00 66.67% 11.11% 0-1 0.00%
          256 Quincy Midwest GLVC 0-3 0.00% 8.00 72.22% 34.40% 0-3 0.00%
          267 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 75.00% 26.39% 0-2 0.00%
          No data for Walsh, Oakland City, or McKendree

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

            Schnautza,

            Is there a site that has all or nearly all d2 scores from the previous day?

            BTW, big win for Findlay over Fairmont State last night.
            Last edited by Knightmoves; 11-16-2017, 10:03 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

              Originally posted by Knightmoves View Post
              Schnautza,

              Is there a site that has all or nearly all d2 scores from the previous day?

              BTW, big win for Findlay over Fairmont State last night.
              This is my daily source. Usually if I have an error, it was misreported on this site.
              http://campus.mst.edu/athleticsarchi...l/d2hoops.html

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                These Performance Indicators from schnautza have been spot on. The selection committee has the option to pick outside the PI index, but rarely do.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                  Ferris State has been impressive so far this year, but it looks like they may have the toughest conference schedule between the three teams that are the likely contenders for the #1 seed. (Despite Findlay's loss, I still think they are a contender). Big game between Ferris and Findlay coming up. Very important for Ferris to protect the home court.

                  Got to throw a bone to the GMAC this year. Despite KWC being down, they have shown that there are some good teams besides Findlay in the league. Hillsdale has been impressive. A-B looks good and most surprising is Cedarville.

                  Biggest surprises in the region: LSSU, Hillsdale, Cedarville and maybe William Jewell. Surprisingly bad: hands down winner is Lewis. Long way to go, of course, plenty of time for reversal of fortunes.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                    Originally posted by Knightmoves View Post

                    Biggest surprises in the region: LSSU, Hillsdale, Cedarville and maybe William Jewell. Surprisingly bad: hands down winner is Lewis. Long way to go, of course, plenty of time for reversal of fortunes.
                    Saw Jewell this weekend. They're not very deep so an injury or foul trouble will hurt them, but their top 5 or 6 are much improved. They put 5 quick athletes out there that can all put the ball on the floor - definitely the best they've been since they've been in the league. Billy Jewell's gonna beat some people this year.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                      7 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 5-0 100.00% 17.00 33.33% 65.95% 5-0 100.00%
                      10 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 7-0 100.00% 16.57 43.10% 56.81% 5-0 100.00%
                      12 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 6-0 100.00% 16.17 29.48% 58.68% 6-0 100.00%
                      30 Findlay Midwest GMAC 3-2 60.00% 15.40 73.67% 45.76% 2-2 50.00%
                      32 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 5-1 83.33% 15.33 38.81% 58.98% 3-1 75.00%
                      34 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 4-1 80.00% 15.20 48.00% 48.20% 4-1 80.00%
                      36 Maryville Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 15.00 50.60% 58.63% 3-1 75.00%
                      48 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 2-2 50.00% 14.75 70.30% 35.95% 2-1 66.67%
                      53 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 4-1 80.00% 14.60 40.24% 56.85% 4-1 80.00%
                      64 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 2-2 50.00% 14.25 67.08% 52.14% 2-2 50.00%
                      65 Truman State Midwest GLVC 3-2 60.00% 14.20 61.67% 52.53% 3-2 60.00%
                      70 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 2-2 50.00% 14.00 64.29% 46.62% 1-1 50.00%
                      78 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 4-1 80.00% 13.80 34.00% 57.19% 4-1 80.00%
                      81 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 2-2 50.00% 13.75 57.50% 46.10% 2-2 50.00%
                      81 Drury Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 13.75 37.08% 55.31% 3-1 75.00%
                      84 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 5-1 83.33% 13.67 30.56% 60.38% 5-1 83.33%
                      106 Malone Midwest GMAC 4-1 80.00% 13.00 31.33% 67.47% 4-1 80.00%
                      124 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 2-3 40.00% 12.60 67.00% 45.88% 2-3 40.00%
                      133 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 3-2 60.00% 12.40 40.67% 52.42% 3-2 60.00%
                      151 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 3-3 50.00% 11.83 43.06% 46.51% 2-2 50.00%
                      163 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 3-3 50.00% 11.50 39.88% 62.28% 3-3 50.00%
                      185 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 2-3 40.00% 10.80 46.00% 47.17% 2-3 40.00%
                      189 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-2 33.33% 10.67 55.00% 45.00% 1-2 33.33%
                      189 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-5 16.67% 10.67 69.17% 36.68% 1-5 16.67%
                      196 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 81.67% 30.94% 0-2 0.00%
                      196 Oakland City Midwest IND 1-1 50.00% 10.50 40.00% 58.57% 1-0 100.00%
                      210 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-3 25.00% 10.25 64.05% 38.80% 1-3 25.00%
                      214 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 3-4 42.86% 10.00 36.90% 60.13% 3-4 42.86%
                      214 Lewis Midwest GLVC 2-4 33.33% 10.00 44.72% 46.20% 2-4 33.33%
                      231 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 1-2 33.33% 9.67 62.22% 41.64% 1-2 33.33%
                      237 Salem International Midwest IND 2-2 50.00% 9.50 30.83% 57.06% 2-2 50.00%
                      237 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 3-3 50.00% 9.50 27.78% 53.72% 3-3 50.00%
                      237 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 9.50 80.00% 34.55% 0-2 0.00%
                      266 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-3 0.00% 8.67 71.11% 37.35% 0-3 0.00%
                      271 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 0-5 0.00% 8.40 68.67% 36.12% 0-5 0.00%
                      292 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 1-3 25.00% 7.25 31.25% 61.79% 1-1 50.00%
                      294 McKendree Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 7.00 16.67% 69.17% 1-1 50.00%
                      298 Quincy Midwest GLVC 0-4 0.00% 6.50 55.06% 44.35% 0-4 0.00%
                      300 Walsh Midwest GMAC 0-1 0.00% 6.00 50.00% 57.50% 0-1 0.00%
                      306 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 0-3 0.00% 5.67 47.46% 45.99% 0-1 0.00%
                      308 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 0-5 0.00% 5.40 41.33% 49.17% 0-3 0.00%

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                        Not even December and the cream has already risen to the top.

                        As has been stated many a time: the PI gets more accurate the more games are played, but the top two are likely to be battling all season for the #1 seed. Findlay is still in contention, they have definitely played the most difficult schedule in the region so far and their PI already reflects that fact. Looking at LSSU's schedule to date makes me think they are legit. They have played some good teams, including Findlay. Their one loss was to Cedarville at Cedarville, they day after beating Findlay.

                        There may be some teams in the regional tournament that have never been there before.

                        Words I thought I would never write: "Big game between William Jewell and Maryville on Thursday." Both these teams are much improved and are going to be a factor in the GLVC.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                          Originally posted by Knightmoves View Post
                          Not even December and the cream has already risen to the top.

                          As has been stated many a time: the PI gets more accurate the more games are played, but the top two are likely to be battling all season for the #1 seed. Findlay is still in contention, they have definitely played the most difficult schedule in the region so far and their PI already reflects that fact. Looking at LSSU's schedule to date makes me think they are legit. They have played some good teams, including Findlay. Their one loss was to Cedarville at Cedarville, they day after beating Findlay.

                          There may be some teams in the regional tournament that have never been there before.

                          Words I thought I would never write: "Big game between William Jewell and Maryville on Thursday." Both these teams are much improved and are going to be a factor in the GLVC.
                          I'm not entirely convinced on WJ yet. Looking at the raw numbers, the 6-0 is impressive. But then I see they have the 3rd weakest schedule so far in the region (based solely on the OW% data) and 20th weakest in the nation. Time will tell if they are real or not.
                          It's a bit reminiscent of USI's schedule in years past with their long undefeated starts but no real competition. This year, USI is actually touting the 5th toughest in region (31st nationally) to date (again, based solely on the OW%). The SCB tournament really helped boost that. And Malone is playing surprisingly well so far, too.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                            Originally posted by schnautza View Post
                            I'm not entirely convinced on WJ yet. Looking at the raw numbers, the 6-0 is impressive. But then I see they have the 3rd weakest schedule so far in the region (based solely on the OW% data) and 20th weakest in the nation. Time will tell if they are real or not.
                            Their schedule hasn't been good so far, but they also have only 1 game they haven't won by double digits. They were ahead of Iowa at halftime. I watched them play two games in our Thanksgiving tourney and they're pretty good. Not sure if they're a tournament team or not, but they're a lot better than they were. If you have a big in the game against them you better hurt them inside because that big isn't going to be able to guard anyone on the other end.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Performance Indicators 2017-18

                              Results through Saturday 12/2
                              I never thought I'd see the day that William Jewell was sitting at 3rd in the region, UWP was dead last, and KWC was in the bottom 50%.

                              2 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 6-0 100.00% 17.17 36.15% 58.63% 6-0 100.00%
                              4 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 9-0 100.00% 16.89 44.22% 58.86% 7-0 100.00%
                              11 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 8-0 100.00% 16.25 34.90% 55.19% 8-0 100.00%
                              23 Findlay Midwest GMAC 6-2 75.00% 15.63 58.33% 54.36% 5-2 71.43%
                              23 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 7-1 87.50% 15.63 44.30% 60.32% 5-1 83.33%
                              33 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 5-2 71.43% 15.29 55.44% 49.35% 5-2 71.43%
                              39 Maryville Midwest GLVC 4-2 66.67% 15.17 58.04% 51.10% 4-2 66.67%
                              43 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 4-2 66.67% 14.67 58.99% 44.37% 4-1 80.00%
                              63 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 4-3 57.14% 14.00 67.04% 40.38% 4-3 57.14%
                              88 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 4-2 66.67% 13.33 46.11% 50.22% 3-1 75.00%
                              97 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 6-2 75.00% 13.00 35.24% 58.46% 6-2 75.00%
                              109 Malone Midwest GMAC 5-2 71.43% 12.71 44.33% 54.81% 5-2 71.43%
                              111 Drury Midwest GLVC 4-2 66.67% 12.67 43.67% 50.66% 4-2 66.67%
                              115 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 3-3 50.00% 12.50 53.25% 57.16% 2-3 40.00%
                              137 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 2-2 50.00% 12.00 56.40% 56.66% 2-2 50.00%
                              147 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 5-3 62.50% 11.88 34.20% 56.95% 4-2 66.67%
                              148 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 5-2 71.43% 11.86 29.02% 59.56% 5-2 71.43%
                              148 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 2-5 28.57% 11.86 69.73% 39.48% 2-5 28.57%
                              159 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 4-2 66.67% 11.67 25.60% 66.00% 4-2 66.67%
                              164 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 4-5 44.44% 11.44 53.55% 52.65% 4-5 44.44%
                              165 Truman State Midwest GLVC 3-4 42.86% 11.43 54.58% 49.69% 3-4 42.86%
                              170 McKendree Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 11.33 30.56% 61.18% 2-1 66.67%
                              183 Walsh Midwest GMAC 2-1 66.67% 11.00 38.89% 61.99% 2-1 66.67%
                              187 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 2-5 28.57% 10.86 63.97% 39.85% 2-5 28.57%
                              189 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 2-3 40.00% 10.80 50.95% 50.24% 2-3 40.00%
                              194 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 3-3 50.00% 10.67 42.92% 52.67% 3-3 50.00%
                              194 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 1-2 33.33% 10.67 48.81% 40.76% 1-2 33.33%
                              200 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 4-4 50.00% 10.50 41.90% 57.08% 4-4 50.00%
                              207 Lewis Midwest GLVC 2-6 25.00% 10.25 60.42% 40.09% 2-6 25.00%
                              212 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 5-3 62.50% 10.13 23.36% 59.27% 5-3 62.50%
                              229 Salem International Midwest IND 3-3 50.00% 9.67 35.85% 54.13% 3-3 50.00%
                              249 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-7 12.50% 9.13 69.94% 43.16% 1-7 12.50%
                              250 Oakland City Midwest IND 1-1 50.00% 9.00 33.33% 57.14% 1-0 100.00%
                              258 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 1-5 16.67% 8.83 60.81% 39.92% 1-5 16.67%
                              271 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-3 0.00% 8.33 76.39% 35.37% 0-3 0.00%
                              281 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 0-7 0.00% 8.00 65.48% 37.14% 0-7 0.00%
                              281 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 1-5 16.67% 8.00 45.00% 52.25% 1-3 25.00%
                              286 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-5 0.00% 7.80 64.29% 36.63% 0-5 0.00%
                              300 Quincy Midwest GLVC 0-6 0.00% 7.00 59.09% 44.46% 0-6 0.00%
                              307 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 0-4 0.00% 5.75 42.71% 47.96% 0-2 0.00%
                              308 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 0-6 0.00% 5.00 46.23% 41.18% 0-4 0.00%

                              Comment

                              Ad3

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X