Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

[wscsuperfan]

SUPER REGION ONE

GMAC
1. Hillsdale (6-1, 5-0)
2. Tiffin (7-0, 4-0)
3. Ohio Dominican (6-1, 4-1)
4. Findlay (4-3, 2-2)
4. Walsh (2-4, 2-2)
6. Alderson-Broaddus (2-5, 1-3)
6. Kentucky Wesleyan (2-4, 1-3)
8. Malone (1-5, 1-4)
9. Lake Erie (0-7, 0-5)

==========================

Mountain East
1. Notre Dame (7-0, 7-0)
2. Charleston (4-3, 4-2)
2. Fairmont State (5-2, 4-2)
2. Shepherd (4-2, 4-2)
5. Glenville State (3-4, 3-3)
5. Urbana (4-3, 3-3)
5. West Virginia State (4-3, 3-3)
8. Virginia-Wise (3-4, 3-4)
9. West Liberty State (2-5, 2-5)
10. West Virginia Wesleyan (1-6, 1-5)
11. Concord (1-6, 1-6)

==========================

Northeast-10
1. Assumption (5-1, 5-0)
1. LIU-Post (6-0, 5-0)
1. New Haven (5-1, 5-0)
4. Pace (4-2, 3-2)
5. Merrimack (2-4, 2-3)
5. Southern Connecticut State (3-3, 2-3)
7. Bentley (1-5, 1-4)
7. St. Anselm (1-4, 1-4)
7. Stonehill (1-5, 1-4)
10. American International (0-5, 0-5)

==========================

PSAC

East
1. Kutztown (6-0, 3-0)
1. West Chester (6-0, 3-0)
3. Bloomsburg (3-4, 2-2)
3. Millersville (2-5, 2-2)
5. Lock Haven (1-6, 1-2)
5. Shippensburg (3-4, 1-2)
7. East Stroudsburg (1-6, 0-4)

West
1. Slippery Rock (6-1, 4-0)
2. California (PA) (4-3, 3-1)
3. Clarion (4-3, 2-2)
3. Gannon (2-5, 2-2)
3. Indiana (PA) (5-2, 2-2)
6. Edinboro (4-3, 1-3)
6. Mercyhurst (2-5, 1-3)
6. Seton Hill (1-6, 1-3)

[wscsuperfan]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

SUPER REGION TWO

CIAA

North
1. Chowan (2-3, 1-0)
1. Virginia Union (4-1, 1-0)
3. Bowie State (5-2, 1-1)
3. Lincoln (PA) (1-6, 1-1)
3. Virginia State (3-3, 1-1)
6. Elizabeth City State (1-4, 0-2)

South
1. Fayetteville State (4-1, 2-0)
1. Winston-Salem State (3-3, 2-0)
3. Shaw (2-4, 1-1)
3. St. Augustine's (2-4, 1-1)
5. Johnson C. Smith (1-5, 0-2)
5. Livingstone (2-4, 0-2)

==========================

Gulf South
1. Valdosta State (7-0, 5-0)
2. West Georgia (7-0, 4-0)
3. North Greenville (4-2, 3-1)
3. West Florida (5-2, 3-1)
5. Florida Tech (5-2, 2-2)
5. West Alabama (5-2, 2-2)
7. Mississippi College (2-4, 0-30
8. Delta State (0-7, 0-5)
8. Shorter (0-7, 0-5)

==========================

Independent
North Carolina-Pembroke (1-4)

==========================

SAC
1. Lenoir-Rhyne (6-1, 5-0)
2. Carson-Newman (5-2, 4-1)
3. Tusculum (4-2, 3-1)
4. Mars Hill (2-5, 2-3)
5. Newberry (3-4, 1-2)
5. Wingate (4-3, 1-2)
7. Catawba (1-5, 0-3)
8. Limestone (0-7, 0-4)

==========================

SIAC

East
1. Albany State (4-3, 3-0)
1. Benedict (5-1, 3-0)
3. Morehouse (6-1, 2-1)
4. Clark Atlanta (2-5, 1-2)
5. Fort Valley State (1-6, 1-3)

West
1. Miles (2-5, 2-1)
1. Tuskegee (4-3, 2-1)
3. Central State (3-4, 1-3)
4. Kentucky State (0-7, 0-3)
4. Lane (1-5, 0-3)

[wscsuperfan]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

SUPER REGION THREE

GAC
1. Ouachita Baptist (7-0)
2. Southern Arkansas (6-1)
3. Harding (5-2)
3. Southeastern Oklahoma State (5-2)
5. Henderson State (4-3)
6. Arkansas-Monticello (3-4)
6. Northwestern Oklahoma State (3-4)
8. Arkansas Tech (2-5)
8. East Central (2-5)
8. Oklahoma Baptist (2-5)
8. Southwestern Oklahoma State (2-5)
12. Southern Nazarene (1-6)

==========================

GLIAC
1. Ferris State (7-0, 5-0)
2. Ashland (3-3, 3-1)
2. Davenport (6-1, 3-1)
2. Grand Valley State (6-1, 3-1)
2. Saginaw Valley State (6-1, 3-1)
6. Northwood (2-5, 2-3)
7. Michigan Tech (3-4, 1-4)
8. Wayne State (MI) (1-6, 0-4)
9. Northern Michigan (1-6, 0-5)

==========================

GLVC
1. Indianapolis (5-1, 4-0)
2. Truman State (4-3, 3-0)
3. McKendree (4-3, 2-1)
3. Missouri S&T (5-2, 2-1)
5. Quincy (2-5, 1-2)
6. Lincoln (MO) (2-5, 1-3)
6. William Jewell (1-5, 1-3)
8. Southwest Baptist (0-6, 0-4)

==========================

MIAA
1. Northwest Missouri State (6-1)
2. Fort Hays State (5-2)
2. Pittsburg State (5-2)
4. Central Oklahoma (4-3)
4. Emporia State (4-3)
4. Missouri Western State (4-3)
4. Nebraska-Kearney (4-3)
4. Washburn (4-3)
9. Central Missouri (3-4)
9. Lindenwood (3-4)
11. Missouri Southern State (0-7)
11. Northeastern State (0-7)

[wscsuperfan]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

SUPER REGION FOUR

GNAC
1. Central Washington (5-2, 5-0)
2. Azusa Pacific (5-2, 4-1)
3. Western Oregon (3-4, 2-3)
4. Humboldt STate (1-5, 1-3)
5. Simon Fraser (1-6, 0-5)

==========================

Lone Star
1. Tarleton State (6-0, 5-0)
2. Midwestern State (6-1, 4-1)
3. Texas A&M-Commerce (5-2, 3-1)
3. West Texas A&M (5-2, 3-1)
5. Angelo State (3-4, 2-3)
5. Eastern New Mexico (2-5, 2-3)
7. Texas-Permian Basin (2-5, 1-3)
8. Texas A&M-Kingsville (2-5, 0-4)
8. Western New Mexico (0-6, 0-4)

==========================

NSIC
1. Minnesota-Duluth (7-0)
1. Minnesota State-Mankato (7-0)
3. Bemidji State (5-2)
3. Minnesota State-Moorhead (5-2)
3. St. Cloud State (5-2)
3. Winona State (5-2)
7. Augustana (4-3)
7. Sioux Falls (4-3)
9. Concordia-St. Paul (3-4)
9. Southwest Minnesota State (3-4)
9. Upper Iowa (3-4)
12. Northern State (2-5)
13. Minnesota-Crookston (1-6)
13. Minot State (1-6)
13. Wayne State (NE) (1-6)
16. Mary (0-7)

==========================

RMAC
1. Colorado School of Mines (7-0, 7-0)
2. Colorado State-Pueblo (6-1, 5-1)
2. Dixie State (5-2, 5-1)
4. Chadron State (4-2, 4-2)
5. Adams State (4-3, 4-3)
6. Colorado Mesa (4-3, 3-3)
6. South Dakota School of Mines (4-3, 3-3)
8. New Mexico Highlands (2-4, 2-4)
9. Black Hills State (1-6, 1-6)
9. Fort Lewis (1-6, 1-6)
11. Western State (0-7, 0-6)

[LIU21]

[Turbonium]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Because this isn't a ranking system, simply conference standings that appear to be in alphabetical order if there's a tie.

[zimmy21]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Because this isn't a ranking system, simply conference standings that appear to be in alphabetical order if there's a tie.

Almost every week there's someone who gets upset over that. Lol it's okay if your team is really that good they'll make it to the top. This thread literally means nothing

[GrifFan]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Because this isn't a ranking system, simply conference standings that appear to be in alphabetical order if there's a tie.

Phoenician Coast Bias.

[Turbonium]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Almost every week there's someone who gets upset over that. Lol it's okay if your team is really that good they'll make it to the top. This thread literally means nothing

I mean it means something, if you like to quickly see what each conference looks like. It seems to be taken as a ranking system for some unknown reason. :bulgy-eyes:

[wscsuperfan]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

I mean it means something, if you like to quickly see what each conference looks like. It seems to be taken as a ranking system for some unknown reason. :bulgy-eyes:

Assumption and Post are both ranked first (along with New Haven) because they all have identical conference records. I just list them alphabetically.

[ShirtedBearcat]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Because it is easier to read. Three teams have a 1 in front of them, because they are 5-0 in conference games. Technically, you could list them all on the same line, but that would just look silly.

[Turbonium]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Assumption and Post are both ranked first (along with New Haven) because they all have identical conference records. I just list them alphabetically.

Yes, I noted above they are alphabetical in my response.

[Predatory Primates]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Almost every week there's someone who gets upset over that. Lol it's okay if your team is really that good they'll make it to the top. This thread literally means nothing

That's how the MIAA works. No tie breakers. If you have 5 teams with the same record, you just have a 5 way tie for first.

[zimmy21]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

That's how the MIAA works. No tie breakers. If you have 5 teams with the same record, you just have a 5 way tie for first.

Same in the NSIC. You can tie for everything even with a head to head advantage

[laker]

Re: Conference Standings - Week #7 (10/14)

Phoenician Coast Bias.

Thank you King of Tyre.

Or was that a slightly veiled attempt to show the Phoenician's contributions to the alphabet?