So....looking like the GLIAC and the NCAA just turning a blind eye to the whole thing...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ruling on Ferris State
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by Twincitiesmav View PostI was wondering what the ruling was? Surprised nothing has been said yet. Maybe they just got a warining?Cal U (Pa.) Class of 2014
Comment
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by Try II View PostWell, what's the incentive NOT to use ineligible players then?? Just site the "Ferris Rule", mention precedent has been set and keeping winning.
Comment
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by dvaara View Postmy hunch is that if this was anything other than a player who never played other than mop up duty in the 4th, they would be all over it
Comment
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by boyblue View PostAs long as that firewall between academics and athletics was not breached and the mistake was an honest clerical error they should be ok, but of course I'm not familiar with the rules.
Comment
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by Redwing View PostI can't resist. It wasn't a clerical error. Athlete was also informed from another school that he would have to sit a year. And there it no excuse for the football staff..i.e. head coach, not knowing the 444 transfer rule/issue.
If it is an honest mistake any chance Ferris is not penalized?
Comment
-
Re: Ruling on Ferris State
Originally posted by boyblue View PostThe report I read made it seem like an administrative error. I could see this being an honest mistake. The player was to have graduated but flunked a course. Admin was supposed to confirm but never did.
If it is an honest mistake any chance Ferris is not penalized?
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment