Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AFCA All-Americans

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AFCA All-Americans

    I count 3 PSACers - surprised that some aren't listed but what do the coaches outside our region know?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EK4Aax0WkAAk-AL?format=jpg&name=small.jpg
Views:	242
Size:	58.2 KB
ID:	462139

  • #2
    I realize there's more to it than stats, but ...
    G Com. Att. Yds Int. TD Rush
    Rogan Wells (1st team) 11 213 297 2,650 4 19 702
    Brook Bolles (2nd team) 13 235 419 4,290 15 42 228
    Roland Rivers 12 274 384 3,825 6 44 624
    Tyson Bagent 12 343 483 4,349 13 36 37
    Collin DiGalbo 12 229 355 3,193 10 30 571
    http://www.indianagazette.com
    www.twitter.com/MattBurglund

    Comment


    • #3
      No team represented by two players

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Matt Burglund View Post
        I realize there's more to it than stats, but ...
        G Com. Att. Yds Int. TD Rush
        Rogan Wells (1st team) 11 213 297 2,650 4 19 702
        Brook Bolles (2nd team) 13 235 419 4,290 15 42 228
        Roland Rivers 12 274 384 3,825 6 44 624
        Tyson Bagent 12 343 483 4,349 13 36 37
        Collin DiGalbo 12 229 355 3,193 10 30 571
        no please tell me what all does it include to be first team because Roland Rivers should've won and if not the Rogan damn sure shouldn't have. too much mental with these choices. should be off current years stats

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mad3 Boss View Post

          no please tell me what all does it include to be first team because Roland Rivers should've won and if not the Rogan damn sure shouldn't have. too much mental with these choices. should be off current years stats
          I'm ridiculously impressed you saw all five play, rather than making that assessment off raw numbers.

          Having seen both, I'd probably take Bagent over Rivers.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by jrshooter View Post

            I'm ridiculously impressed you saw all five play, rather than making that assessment off raw numbers.

            Having seen both, I'd probably take Bagent over Rivers.
            pretty sure youd take bagent over rivers especially after he put 416 4 pass td and 1 rush td on yall.

            and yea I watched Roland beat bagent and digalbo and traveled to Valdosta and saw rogan play so yes be impressed.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jrshooter View Post
              I'm ridiculously impressed you saw all five play, rather than making that assessment off raw numbers.
              Do you think the coaches who voted on this did?
              http://www.indianagazette.com
              www.twitter.com/MattBurglund

              Comment


              • #8
                The SR1 poor reputation plays a factor.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
                  The SR1 poor reputation plays a factor.
                  I would've thought 5 PSAC teams in playoffs would've accounted for something

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mad3 Boss View Post

                    I would've thought 5 PSAC teams in playoffs would've accounted for something
                    The PSAC is viewed in D2 as the MAC is in FBS. The only reason we have teams finish top 10 is because there's a real playoff.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                      The PSAC is viewed in D2 as the MAC is in FBS. The only reason we have teams finish top 10 is because there's a real playoff.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by jrshooter View Post

                        I'm ridiculously impressed you saw all five play, rather than making that assessment off raw numbers.

                        Having seen both, I'd probably take Bagent over Rivers.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                          The PSAC is viewed in D2 as the MAC is in FBS. The only reason we have teams finish top 10 is because there's a real playoff.
                          Naw. The AAC is a more apt comparison of perception. People see us as not the worst of the worst, but no shot at competing for titles. The MAC would be something like this year's NE-10.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That would probably be their mistake.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Mad3 Boss View Post

                              pretty sure youd take bagent over rivers especially after he put 416 4 pass td and 1 rush td on yall.

                              and yea I watched Roland beat bagent and digalbo and traveled to Valdosta and saw rogan play so yes be impressed.
                              Until his last game I thought DiGalbo was a better QB than Rivers. Rivers has better support than the other PSAC QB's IMO, a better line and better receivers. Statistically, at least for passing, Bagent does them all in. I think Rivers has untapped running ability. He beat IUP and Kutztown with his legs in the last minutes of the 4th quarter. If he needs to scramble he can beat most D2 teams.

                              It's hard to say who is best but it's difficult to understand the Valdosta guy being #1 with those stats.

                              Comment

                              Ad3

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X