Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PASSHE Institutions Merging

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

    There are maturity models like Gartner that detail how mature you are in an area. Like Level 0 is no process at all - chaotic. Level 1 is Reactive...and it steps up. So Leve 1, something happens and you just handle it however you think

    What I mean is you call one of these colleges for say Admissions, and it gets handled one way. Then you call and get another person and they handle it another way. And maybe they make a mistake and the process isn't complete. Then, another person calls you like you are totally new. Then, maybe after you are enrolled...someone calls you to ask you if you'd like to enroll. (Something very similar to this happened to be a few years ago at one of these schools.)

    What I mean by process maturity, is you have a defined process that each of the reps follow and it's consistent each time. Not dependent on who answers the phone.

    And this goes for other areas. Like I recently heard about a student who wanted to drop a class from one of these colleges, but they were in Colorado. So the school requires paper documents and wanted it sent to the school. Why not go digital? Why not make it a form online?

    Stuff like that...and it adds up over the course of a students time on a campus. And the Mega online providers have it down. They make becoming a customer VERY easy.

    If you look at these schools, they don't have super defined processes and would be pretty low on maturity models if assessed.

    As far as standardization being what people are afraid of - You have to do it in the Triads for certain areas...especially business areas. You basically have to do it or this will be chaotic. Now that doesn't mean that schools lose their identities.
    When everything operates online you have to be paperless, which helps. SO many colleges still operate on an adjusted model of the 20th century era of 18-22 year old students living on campus. Colleges also have TONS of gatekeeping hurdles for students and staff and forms are the easiest way to do that.

    But we have 1,000+ independent colleges and universities in this country and 1,000+ ways of operating. As cookie cutter as some of PASSHE seems, every school is set up differently. Admissions is its own division, under marketing/communications, under Student Affairs, reports to the president, etc. Some have Financial Aid in a different division. Some have New Student Orientation grouped with Admissions, some have it elsewhere. And that is industry wide.

    A story I frequently tell is that 7-10 years ago my wife was exploring a master's program and she needed her transcript. She had to print a paper form then either mail it or fax it with credit card info on the form. I said something about it online and the Director of Alumni Relations emailed me to scold me on my critical post! It mostly focused on how the person overseeing that department is a really nice person who had been there a long time. Another fun "forms story" is that a school had forms for change of major, change of name, etc. but also forms to change your sex and change your race. I get that students could possibly change their sex - especially now that more students are identifying as non-binary - but how/when would a student change their race!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

      When everything operates online you have to be paperless, which helps. SO many colleges still operate on an adjusted model of the 20th century era of 18-22 year old students living on campus. Colleges also have TONS of gatekeeping hurdles for students and staff and forms are the easiest way to do that.

      But we have 1,000+ independent colleges and universities in this country and 1,000+ ways of operating. As cookie cutter as some of PASSHE seems, every school is set up differently. Admissions is its own division, under marketing/communications, under Student Affairs, reports to the president, etc. Some have Financial Aid in a different division. Some have New Student Orientation grouped with Admissions, some have it elsewhere. And that is industry wide.

      A story I frequently tell is that 7-10 years ago my wife was exploring a master's program and she needed her transcript. She had to print a paper form then either mail it or fax it with credit card info on the form. I said something about it online and the Director of Alumni Relations emailed me to scold me on my critical post! It mostly focused on how the person overseeing that department is a really nice person who had been there a long time. Another fun "forms story" is that a school had forms for change of major, change of name, etc. but also forms to change your sex and change your race. I get that students could possibly change their sex - especially now that more students are identifying as non-binary - but how/when would a student change their race!
      In this day and age, hard paper for any administrative task should be the rare, RARE, exception to the rule. Heck, the need to come into an office to discuss any part of a students administration (applications for this and that, admissions, course scheduling, etc) should also be rare. But the trouble with bureaucracies is that "dinosaurs" often roam the halls and get into positions of authority. These dinosaurs are comfortable with what the process they learned 15 years ago and are unwilling to change.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

        In this day and age, hard paper for any administrative task should be the rare, RARE, exception to the rule. Heck, the need to come into an office to discuss any part of a students administration (applications for this and that, admissions, course scheduling, etc) should also be rare. But the trouble with bureaucracies is that "dinosaurs" often roam the halls and get into positions of authority. These dinosaurs are comfortable with what the process they learned 15 years ago and are unwilling to change.
        Dunder Mifflin

        Unlimited paper in a paperless world.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

          In this day and age, hard paper for any administrative task should be the rare, RARE, exception to the rule. Heck, the need to come into an office to discuss any part of a students administration (applications for this and that, admissions, course scheduling, etc) should also be rare. But the trouble with bureaucracies is that "dinosaurs" often roam the halls and get into positions of authority. These dinosaurs are comfortable with what the process they learned 15 years ago and are unwilling to change.
          And that's more of what I'm talking about. Modernize. Streamline. Do those things before a drastic integration.

          Unfortunately, I feel like those things needed done 5-7 years ago.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

            In this day and age, hard paper for any administrative task should be the rare, RARE, exception to the rule. Heck, the need to come into an office to discuss any part of a students administration (applications for this and that, admissions, course scheduling, etc) should also be rare. But the trouble with bureaucracies is that "dinosaurs" often roam the halls and get into positions of authority. These dinosaurs are comfortable with what the process they learned 15 years ago and are unwilling to change.
            In my last job, I noticed that nearly all employees had their own printers in their individual offices, even though we had a very expensive high volume color laser machine in the suite. I convinced my VP do away with them and paper usage plummeted.

            The only thing Zoom can't replicate is open office hours for students. Today's students don't call or email so appointment-making isn't in their nature.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

              There are maturity models like Gartner that detail how mature you are in an area. Like Level 0 is no process at all - chaotic. Level 1 is Reactive...and it steps up. So Leve 1, something happens and you just handle it however you think

              What I mean is you call one of these colleges for say Admissions, and it gets handled one way. Then you call and get another person and they handle it another way. And maybe they make a mistake and the process isn't complete. Then, another person calls you like you are totally new. Then, maybe after you are enrolled...someone calls you to ask you if you'd like to enroll. (Something very similar to this happened to be a few years ago at one of these schools.)

              What I mean by process maturity, is you have a defined process that each of the reps follow and it's consistent each time. Not dependent on who answers the phone.

              And this goes for other areas. Like I recently heard about a student who wanted to drop a class from one of these colleges, but they were in Colorado. So the school requires paper documents and wanted it sent to the school. Why not go digital? Why not make it a form online?

              Stuff like that...and it adds up over the course of a students time on a campus. And the Mega online providers have it down. They make becoming a customer VERY easy.

              If you look at these schools, they don't have super defined processes and would be pretty low on maturity models if assessed.

              As far as standardization being what people are afraid of - You have to do it in the Triads for certain areas...especially business areas. You basically have to do it or this will be chaotic. Now that doesn't mean that schools lose their identities.
              I think they used to call that bureaucracy (back in the old days).

              In bureaucratic systems individuals lose control and feel helpless. Change becomes more difficult.

              Less local control, more detachment from the actual processes. Maturity - perhaps.

              Oh, and I forgot to mention. Less concern for the outcome on behalf of the staff member. Less personal responsibility and less personal investment on the ground level. The "identity" part starts slipping away.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                In my last job, I noticed that nearly all employees had their own printers in their individual offices, even though we had a very expensive high volume color laser machine in the suite. I convinced my VP do away with them and paper usage plummeted.

                The only thing Zoom can't replicate is open office hours for students. Today's students don't call or email so appointment-making isn't in their nature.
                Yep. And those single-user printers are the most expensive to operate for ink too.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

                  I think they used to call that bureaucracy (back in the old days).

                  In bureaucratic systems individuals lose control and feel helpless. Change becomes more difficult.

                  Less local control, more detachment from the actual processes. Maturity - perhaps.

                  Oh, and I forgot to mention. Less concern for the outcome on behalf of the staff member. Less personal responsibility and less personal investment on the ground level. The "identity" part starts slipping away.
                  Yep. No concern for the outcome ie helping the student.

                  Some areas are so messed up by lack of process that they hire a full-time employee to facilitate something because of a lack of defined process...then people on campus think the employee is the process.

                  And I do agree that the major 'fight' against the Integrations is what you detail. The Universities are at a point financially where they must be streamlined and that's going to entail staff and faculty reduction...and they're fighting it tooth and nail.

                  Comment


                  • Pennsylvania's State System of Higher Education
                    @statesystem24m
                    The Board of Governors just took the historic step of freezing basic in-state tuition for a 3rd consecutive year, affirming its commitment to keeping public higher education affordable for students during the ongoing pandemic. Read more: https://bit.ly/32fRDHl #Redesigned4PA

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

                      And that's more of what I'm talking about. Modernize. Streamline. Do those things before a drastic integration.

                      Unfortunately, I feel like those things needed done 5-7 years ago.
                      As a manager/executive, you are always going to have to address problems. Good leaders address them when they are small and easier to manage...Poor managers wait until the problem is so huge that it threatens to sink the whole operation. Imagine were the individual schools would be if 7 years ago, a forward thinking leader had looked at enrolement numbers, state demographic projections, school labor costs (you know, the things a good leader should be aware of!!) and made the then small "course corrections" necessary to address them? But instead the PASSHE had a collection of Titanic Captains who plowed their schools full speed ahead into an ice field!!!!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                        In my last job, I noticed that nearly all employees had their own printers in their individual offices, even though we had a very expensive high volume color laser machine in the suite. I convinced my VP do away with them and paper usage plummeted.

                        The only thing Zoom can't replicate is open office hours for students. Today's students don't call or email so appointment-making isn't in their nature.
                        "PC load letter?" What's that supposed to mean!!!!

                        This whole PASSHE process reminds me completly of Office Space!! I'd be the neighbor who Peter asked what he'd do with a million dollars - "I tell you what I'd do. Two chicks at the same time."

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

                          Yep. No concern for the outcome ie helping the student.

                          Some areas are so messed up by lack of process that they hire a full-time employee to facilitate something because of a lack of defined process...then people on campus think the employee is the process.

                          And I do agree that the major 'fight' against the Integrations is what you detail. The Universities are at a point financially where they must be streamlined and that's going to entail staff and faculty reduction...and they're fighting it tooth and nail.
                          I don't think you understand what I was saying. To break it down, I was criticizing the "process maturity" model that you associate with greater consolidation, i see your justification as increased bureaucracy where individuals lose control. You also characterize the individual schools' administration as essentially incompetent and I don't think that's the case, and, if it were, it wouldn't matter too much.

                          You want "process maturity?" Wait until these school groupings are a reality and see how the process of serving individuals goes.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

                            As a manager/executive, you are always going to have to address problems. Good leaders address them when they are small and easier to manage...Poor managers wait until the problem is so huge that it threatens to sink the whole operation. Imagine were the individual schools would be if 7 years ago, a forward thinking leader had looked at enrolement numbers, state demographic projections, school labor costs (you know, the things a good leader should be aware of!!) and made the then small "course corrections" necessary to address them? But instead the PASSHE had a collection of Titanic Captains who plowed their schools full speed ahead into an ice field!!!!
                            I agree - my school district has grown and continues to share its research into growth projections with taxpayers. All these presidents had to do is maintain a relationship with local school districts and they'd hear what is going on. I do think a few thought they were able to outsmart the others. But in hindsight its industry-wide.

                            Part of this is that nearly all PASSHE presidents are first timers and use system universities as an internship. The 40th-percentile salary gets you that. Presidents come in, make strategic decisions to build a resume, then jump ship for a pay raise. You can't earn a promotion by staying the course for four years. For example, Julie Wollman averaged $250k when she was president at Edinboro 2012-2016. She then jumped to Widener where she makes $550k plus her husband gets an annual $30k fee for "consulting duties."

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

                              I don't think you understand what I was saying. To break it down, I was criticizing the "process maturity" model that you associate with greater consolidation, i see your justification as increased bureaucracy where individuals lose control. You also characterize the individual schools' administration as essentially incompetent and I don't think that's the case, and, if it were, it wouldn't matter too much.

                              You want "process maturity?" Wait until these school groupings are a reality and see how the process of serving individuals goes.
                              Process maturity is neither good or bad by itself, but in a public service oriented business, it is important to success. But managers need to be able to identify which processes are working and contributing to success and which are f'ed up and costing time and money. Holding on to a failed process just because it is "mature" is a very bureaucratic thing to do. Unfortuanatly, shared services like envisioned tends to increase bureaucracy.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

                                Process maturity is neither good or bad by itself, but in a public service oriented business, it is important to success. But managers need to be able to identify which processes are working and contributing to success and which are f'ed up and costing time and money. Holding on to a failed process just because it is "mature" is a very bureaucratic thing to do. Unfortuanatly, shared services like envisioned tends to increase bureaucracy.
                                Process maturity, consolidation, streamlining - this all comes with the territory. The goal is to save money. All the talk about serving the needs of students is hogwash, in my opinion. That will probably not happen.

                                Something like "process maturity" is minutiae. It's just jargon in this context. The organizational factor that is paramount and overrides everything else is centralization. And, I would add, everything that comes with it.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X