Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
THE IUP Football Thread
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by IUPNation View Post
It is kind of a no brainer. They should have agreed to make them all Thursday night games when they signed the contract.
Maybe they did and can't actually announce it. I don't know.
​​​​Those are the only good atmospheres in the funeral parlor known as Miller Stadium.
I've long thought D2 should try to take over Thursday night. We will never, ever compete with D1 football for viewers.
The crowds are much more lively, etc. And, God forbid, students even attend.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View PostWhile we suspected it, the Ashland game is now confirmed on Thursday night.
Ashland has a tremendous stadium. I'd venture to say it is one of the nicest D2 facilities in the country.
There's no track so you are really close to the action. If you plan on doing a road trip this upcoming season this is a good one.
IUP took a nice crowd out there in 2018. There are nice tailgate lots and a couple nice bar/restaurants close by.
Maybe they did and can't actually announce it. I don't know.
Leave a comment:
-
While we suspected it, the Ashland game is now confirmed on Thursday night.
Ashland has a tremendous stadium. I'd venture to say it is one of the nicest D2 facilities in the country.
There's no track so you are really close to the action. If you plan on doing a road trip this upcoming season this is a good one.
IUP took a nice crowd out there in 2018. There are nice tailgate lots and a couple nice bar/restaurants close by.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
My guess is he got a good class. As I said, many of the perceived 'big boys' in the PSAC took pretty small high school classes. That in itself should have left a lot of quality players available.
Of course, signing them is the first step. Getting them to Senior Day (at Ship) is the next challenge.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ship69 View Post
I think Mac was to the point of having to do something after the past couple of years and to his credit he and his staff by all accounts went out and got the work done. We'll see how it works out. I don't expect big things next season, but it would be nice if some of these guys stick around and eventually get us back to overall competitiveness.
Of course, signing them is the first step. Getting them to Senior Day (at Ship) is the next challenge.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
Yeah a big number will either stay as Ship students or just move along. Football is great at this level for dangling the carrot. Consider about 70 percent of our teams pay their own way. Hell, I'd sign 300 if possible. Dangle that carrot.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
Stewart won't be second fiddle. He'll be the starter. This is his team now. Not the other way around.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ship69 View Post
Speaking of big rosters, I had counted 51 names on the Shippensburg spring roster prior to signing day. At last count, Mac's incoming class was up to 48 players, by far his largest ever. I think it's safe to say there will be some movement on the Raiders' roster in the coming season.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ram040506 View Post
So you think Stewart is going to be "cool" with being 2nd fiddle then? After being the guy for the last couple years...
Agree completely on line depth, there should be no end to adding to either of those position groups. Region 1 isn't lacking in depth at the skill positions, it's just up front.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
No doubt more the merrier.
My point was I think some other positions were in need of said depth (in particular you can always use more on either line).
I'm sure the Bloom RB is going to have a big season. I just worry about line depth.
End of the day Tort is working a salary cap. That's a lot of coin tied up in RBs.
Agree completely on line depth, there should be no end to adding to either of those position groups. Region 1 isn't lacking in depth at the skill positions, it's just up front.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
We talk about not having the depth to compete with out-of-region powers then we get depth and we talk about keeping everybody happy. Know what I'm saying?
IUP has traditionally sought to be 4 deep at RB. Basically, if the 4 are the players I am thinking of, we have 2 elite RB's (whose styles are different, BTW) and 2 guys with a lot of experience for "depth", if that is the appropriate word.
Also, the "unhappy" theme assumes that the players are me first rather than team players. I don't think that is true.
Also, don't overlook the FB types they have back there if they choose to use them.
I think you guys wasted scholarship money on a position you really didn't need. Of course this is based on who we think is coming back, so maybe we don't have the full picture here.
Don't overlook the FB types? You guys certainly don't use them as a threat, so unless that is all of a sudden going to change, I'll overlook it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
We talk about not having the depth to compete with out-of-region powers then we get depth and we talk about keeping everybody happy. Know what I'm saying?
IUP has traditionally sought to be 4 deep at RB. Basically, if the 4 are the players I am thinking of, we have 2 elite RB's (whose styles are different, BTW) and 2 guys with a lot of experience for "depth", if that is the appropriate word.
Also, the "unhappy" theme assumes that the players are me first rather than team players. I don't think that is true.
Also, don't overlook the FB types they have back there if they choose to use them.
My point was I think some other positions were in need of said depth (in particular you can always use more on either line).
I'm sure the Bloom RB is going to have a big season. I just worry about line depth.
End of the day Tort is working a salary cap. That's a lot of coin tied up in RBs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ram040506 View Post
I'm sure all 4 starting caliber backs will be thrilled to get 5-8 carries a game and not whine about it...
I get that you can never have enough backs, but it just doesn't make sense to me to bring in the Bloom RB. That room is just never going to be satisfied and you guys don't need the bickering. Feel like its just a scab that is going to get scratched.
Plus on top of that, the way you guys have touted and loaded up on some very talented WR's... are you a running team or a passing team? Just seems like neither part of your extensive weapons are ever going to be happy. In the couple games I watched your QB, it seemed he's most comfortable in the quick game and using his feet as a threat. Is the offensive system creative and flexible enough to keep all these weapons happy?
IUP has traditionally sought to be 4 deep at RB. Basically, if the 4 are the players I am thinking of, we have 2 elite RB's (whose styles are different, BTW) and 2 guys with a lot of experience for "depth", if that is the appropriate word.
Also, the "unhappy" theme assumes that the players are me first rather than team players. I don't think that is true.
Also, don't overlook the FB types they have back there if they choose to use them.Last edited by iupgroundhog; 02-21-2024, 09:40 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ram040506 View Post
I'm sure all 4 starting caliber backs will be thrilled to get 5-8 carries a game and not whine about it...
I get that you can never have enough backs, but it just doesn't make sense to me to bring in the Bloom RB. That room is just never going to be satisfied and you guys don't need the bickering. Feel like its just a scab that is going to get scratched.
Plus on top of that, the way you guys have touted and loaded up on some very talented WR's... are you a running team or a passing team? Just seems like neither part of your extensive weapons are ever going to be happy. In the couple games I watched your QB, it seemed he's most comfortable in the quick game and using his feet as a threat. Is the offensive system creative and flexible enough to keep all these weapons happy?
I'd say they are assuming not all four will finish the season. If you get through a full year with all four RBs you're pretty lucky.
I thought they could have spent the Monaco money elsewhere but seemed to get jumped for saying so. As we said, they can't all play. And, these aren't all young kids. They are now all upperclassmen, and, at best, they will be splitting carries.
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: