Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone agree, UWF needed another two TD's to make a compelling PO argument?

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Anyone agree, UWF needed another two TD's to make a compelling PO argument?

    After this year I doubt a 3 loss GSC team will ever get the nod over a two loss SAC team because the more we play the more evident it will become that the two conferences are closer in strength than ever before. However there may still be some lingering feelings that the GSC is stronger, so a close game would have done the trick.

  • #2
    The Argos played 4 teams with a winning record and lost to three of them. To be a playoff team you have bear winning teams and the Argo offense just wasn’t capable of doing that this year. The offense could beat up on the weaker teams on the schedule just not the strong teams.

    The offense was young this year and if they can come back and play to the level of the defense next year they should be able to win more of the tougher games on the schedule and make the playoffs. A close loss to the Blazers last night would not do it this year with all the two loss teams in the region this year.

    Comment


    • #3
      The SAC is now very competitive with GSC so a three loss team doesn’t have a chance to be in the top six because seven seed most likely is a earned access team. There were four SAC teams with only two losses or less.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don’t know, will depend how SOS factors in. Argo losses were “quality”, two number 1 teams and a top ten finisher.

        The first region rankings had undefeated VSU at 3rd behind two one loss schools, totally due to SOS, so there is a chance that a 2 loss school with poor SOS could get bumped.

        Not likely, just possible.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bearhof View Post
          The SAC is now very competitive with GSC
          The GSC of present is not the GSC of old. Top to bottom, the SAC is probably superior.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rational Observer View Post

            The GSC of present is not the GSC of old. Top to bottom, the SAC is probably superior.
            I wish it wasn't the case, but the top level GSC teams are still pretty consistently on a higher level than the SAC's teams.

            Realistically, If West Florida was in the SAC, this year's Argo team would have more than likely won the SAC title this year.

            Comment


            • #7
              I remember a day when the GSC was so tough a three loss team could get in.
              Go Blazers, Braves , Falcons, Hawks and Jackets!

              Comment


              • #8
                It's not over for the GSC, as a matter of fact had UWF played a hundred teams other than GV they could have made it in.

                Comment

                Ad3

                Collapse
                Working...
                X