After this year I doubt a 3 loss GSC team will ever get the nod over a two loss SAC team because the more we play the more evident it will become that the two conferences are closer in strength than ever before. However there may still be some lingering feelings that the GSC is stronger, so a close game would have done the trick.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone agree, UWF needed another two TD's to make a compelling PO argument?
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
The Argos played 4 teams with a winning record and lost to three of them. To be a playoff team you have bear winning teams and the Argo offense just wasn’t capable of doing that this year. The offense could beat up on the weaker teams on the schedule just not the strong teams.
The offense was young this year and if they can come back and play to the level of the defense next year they should be able to win more of the tougher games on the schedule and make the playoffs. A close loss to the Blazers last night would not do it this year with all the two loss teams in the region this year.
- 1 like
-
I don’t know, will depend how SOS factors in. Argo losses were “quality”, two number 1 teams and a top ten finisher.
The first region rankings had undefeated VSU at 3rd behind two one loss schools, totally due to SOS, so there is a chance that a 2 loss school with poor SOS could get bumped.
Not likely, just possible.
Comment
-
I wish it wasn't the case, but the top level GSC teams are still pretty consistently on a higher level than the SAC's teams.Originally posted by Rational Observer View Post
The GSC of present is not the GSC of old. Top to bottom, the SAC is probably superior.
Realistically, If West Florida was in the SAC, this year's Argo team would have more than likely won the SAC title this year.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment