Originally posted by vikingfaithful
View Post
the reality is from a school standpoint and title 9 standpoint being good in women's soccer matters too.
The problem with that -- not a complaint -- is most average casual folks don't care about womens soccer and do about football and basketball.
hard to get big donations (not impossible) for women's soccer - easier for football in most cases.
and if you are good in football, there is a residual of averag students coming that isn't there for being good at women's soccer. so the insitutions would actually be better off from an enrollment standpoint (and the bottom line) being good at football than.
I hear lots of lip service on being good at football -- especially the last 15 years at SMSU, but little action. to be fair way to early for the NEW AD to judge.
I can say lots of lip service from the last 2 presidents but mostly action otherwise (example canceling Hawaiian Night). The tone deafness is interesting.
Great if we are good at golf -- hope we are, but it all flows from football. I have head many say and observe "if we get off to a good start in football, there is just a different vibe regarding all the sports" and that is often from non revenue coaches -- it is true they understand you need good football - makes the school more attractive to recruits and the school better for many --
Leave a comment: