Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024 SMSU Mustangs: Year 3 of Underwood

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by TJE_ View Post

    Not sure. I kept hearing how Minnesota schools had an advantage over SD schools because they received state funding for scholarships and SD schools can’t. Has to be privately raised every year. Northern up until a couple years ago were down a few scholarships but as of right now are fully funded
    That’s because you’re in SD 🙂
    From the list I heard/saw, Winona and Mankato were at or very near 36. I don’t think any other MN school is above 32, but I could absolutely be wrong on that. I’m going from the last info I had, which isn’t brand new.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by TJE_ View Post

      Not sure. I kept hearing how Minnesota schools had an advantage over SD schools because they received state funding for scholarships and SD schools can’t. Has to be privately raised every year. Northern up until a couple years ago were down a few scholarships but as of right now are fully funded
      I think the only time state funding has come up as an advantage for MN schools is in building stadiums. Definitely not with scholarships.

      Comment


      • Witt jump in here on the schollies!!!!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by TJE_ View Post

          Not sure. I kept hearing how Minnesota schools had an advantage over SD schools because they received state funding for scholarships and SD schools can’t. Has to be privately raised every year. Northern up until a couple years ago were down a few scholarships but as of right now are fully funded
          This may not still be the case, but used to be, that minnesota did allow tax dollars to go towards athletic scholarships and South Dakota did not allow state funds to be allowed for athletic scholarships.

          It's been many years since I learned about this, but atleast then, that was the case.

          *This applies to state schools only

          Comment


          • Originally posted by NSU4LIFE View Post

            This may not still be the case, but used to be, that minnesota did allow tax dollars to go towards athletic scholarships and South Dakota did not allow state funds to be allowed for athletic scholarships.

            It's been many years since I learned about this, but atleast then, that was the case.

            *This applies to state schools only
            SD may not directly fund scholarships but throw lots of taxpayer dollars at the 2 D1 schools athletic departments.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by vikingfaithful View Post

              SD may not directly fund scholarships but throw lots of taxpayer dollars at the 2 D1 schools athletic departments.
              Again, i don't know all the ins and outs as well as I used to, but typically the dollars can be spent on building projects, travel, salaries, but most of the rest is privately funded. Coaches salaries at that level and travel add up quite quickly.

              If I have the numbers correct, of the $100 million in projects Northern did over the past ten to fifteen years, they got like $15-$20 millions from the state, which the majority went toward the new SD School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by vikingfaithful View Post

                SD may not directly fund scholarships but throw lots of taxpayer dollars at the 2 D1 schools athletic departments.
                I know FB&T Arena was privately funded - but I still find it funny that SDSU shut down the dairy barn in Watertown around the same time they announced the arena. It made a lot of people upset.

                At least it shows what their priorities are. Sad thing is, some people want SMSU to be that way - sacrifice academics for sports.

                Comment


                • It remains a season of fiction. Can't believe this is happening.

                  Offense has now scored 6 tds in 8 games !

                  opposing defenses have scored 9 tds -- with another pick 6 by Moorhead this one for 95 yards! amazing

                  2nd 90 yard td this year by a defense against the Mustangs. Seems impossible yet here we are.

                  Wyatt Oak looked ok in the 2nd half at times. but for most of the gae we could not do much.

                  Amazing how afte the last few years of good line and running games we CAN'T run the ball at all. i get they are stacking th box but we can't do anything running the ball.

                  this is big week obviously

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

                    That’s because you’re in SD 🙂
                    From the list I heard/saw, Winona and Mankato were at or very near 36. I don’t think any other MN school is above 32, but I could absolutely be wrong on that. I’m going from the last info I had, which isn’t brand new.
                    That is what I heard, but that was several years ago. I think that StateU did the research but since SCSU went down the toilet he doesn't go to their sporting contests anymore. Really sad for an institution to suffer such poor leadership. I guess substituting a poetry contest for Homecoming and men's soccer for football was their solution.

                    Yes, I would like to see a list of football scholarships for each NSIC school.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by debergfan
                      Somehow Jamestown joining NSIC has more pages than the maybe the worse d2 in the country. Wild time to be alive.
                      Some grade A insight here.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by MrMustang View Post
                        this is big week obviously
                        Saturday will be interesting. Two bottom five-to-ten offenses in Division 2.
                        Total offense: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 155th out of 159.
                        Yards per play: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 157th out of 159.
                        Scoring offense: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 153rd out of 159.

                        SMSU is at home, but UMary had last weekend off.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Stanger86 View Post

                          Saturday will be interesting. Two bottom five-to-ten offenses in Division 2.
                          Total offense: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 155th out of 159.
                          Yards per play: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 157th out of 159.
                          Scoring offense: SMSU 159th out of 159; UMary 153rd out of 159.

                          SMSU is at home, but UMary had last weekend off.
                          That sounds like the pillow fight of the year…

                          6-0 Mary on a defensive TD and missed PAT

                          Comment


                          • I've got Mary in this one. I just don't see a way.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

                              That sounds like the pillow fight of the year…

                              6-0 Mary on a defensive TD and missed PAT
                              Or 3-3 and they call the game a tie after 5 overtimes.

                              Comment


                              • Can we please sustain a drive before the 4th quarter? That's all I'm asking at this point.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X