Texas A&M University-Kingsville has a long history of football greatness. I think that Sports Illustrated once even wrote about how many former Javelina players were having so much success in the NFL. So, comparisons with other up-and-coming programs in D2 or the LSC is not a good comparison.
In Division 1, there are schools that once had powerhouse football programs that have fallen into mediocrity. I'm looking at schools like Nebraska, University of Tennessee, UCLA, etc. Some of this is cyclical -- or waiting for insurmountable dynasties (e.g., Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, etc.) to lose their luster. However, that isn't a problem in the LSC.
Someone elsewhere pointed at how Texas A&M University-Kingsville is a small, quiet town. However, this wasn't a problem in the past. I graduated with multiple degrees from the university. I enjoyed my time there. It is a relatively short drive from Corpus Christi, San Antonio and the Rio Grande Valley. The 45-minute drive from Corpus Christi is nothing. I now live in the Silicon Valley. This morning, it took me 45 minutes to drive five miles on the 101.
Personally, I think that it comes down to recruitment, facilities and coaching. As the old adage goes, "you can't make money if you don't spend money." Texas A&M University-Kingsville needs to boost the athletic program. We need a team of scouts that can target real talent -- nationwide -- that might be overlooked elsewhere. This includes high schools, college football cuts and, yes, junior colleges. We need coaches who coach to the strengths of the team they've got. If you don't have a marquee passer, then implement a run option (or vice versa). While Einstein might not have really said it, it is insane to do the same thing repeatedly while expecting different results.
And, of course, we need great facilities. It is difficult to attach statistics to how lucrative a football program is to a school in terms of getting that school's name out. However, prospective students who visit the university do visit the stadium during college tours.
A few years ago, I was taking my sister-in-law around Stanford University. She was an incoming freshman. She -- along with other freshmen -- marveled at Stanford Stadium and the other athletic facilities. As beautiful as the Stanford campus might be, she said that this was when she first realized that she was going to a "big" school (and Stanford's undergraduate population is smaller than Texas A&M University-Kingsville's). What do prospective freshmen think when they see the seemingly ancient facilities in Kingsville?
Someone else pointed out that some premiere high schools in Texas have facilities better than Javelina Stadium. Even a minor face lift could help. The stadium could update the stands and add new locker rooms to the north and south end zones (wrapping around and connecting to the existing structures) to look more like "big name" school's stadium. The old locker rooms could be used for other sports too. This is a relatively nominal cost -- something that many of us would be willing to donate toward.
Not only is recruitment and new facilities (including facilities for the football team) important, but it is also important to tell potential recruits that you will do what you can to get them noticed elsewhere. The athletic department needs to follow through with this too. The school should do whatever it can to help potential NFL draftees be "seen" by NFL scouts. This is where highlight reels come in handy.
I got my hair cut at a Sport Clips in San Mateo during lunch today. The barber is a huge football fan. He has a family member who is a scout for the 49ers. He laughed that I am a Cowboys fan living in the Bay Area. However, he respected my willingness to admit as much (especially after last night's game). I brought up the fact that I once met John Randle. This became a segue in which we discussed small schools. This guy knew his stuff. He knew about A&M-Kingsville (and that it was formerly known as A&I). He knew about Gene Upshaw, Jermaine Mayberry, Darrel Green, Al Harris, Roberto Garza and, oddly enough, Eddie Moten. He said that the 49ers have a scouting ombudsman who acts as a contact for small schools.
When Coach Darren Wilkinson was hired, I was elated. He was coming from a National Championship team. For the first time in a while, I felt optimistic about the prospects for the Javelina football team. However, while I felt that he was (and is) an improvement over his predecessor, success has remained out-of-reach. I wonder how well Coach Wilkinson was vetted in regard to what he knows about how the Colorado State-Pueblo team was built. It isn't just about running plays. It's about recruiting the players who can be optimal for those plays (or, else, devise plays that play to the team's strengths).
Obviously, something needs to be done. The last truly great season for Javelina football was in 2010.
In Division 1, there are schools that once had powerhouse football programs that have fallen into mediocrity. I'm looking at schools like Nebraska, University of Tennessee, UCLA, etc. Some of this is cyclical -- or waiting for insurmountable dynasties (e.g., Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, etc.) to lose their luster. However, that isn't a problem in the LSC.
Someone elsewhere pointed at how Texas A&M University-Kingsville is a small, quiet town. However, this wasn't a problem in the past. I graduated with multiple degrees from the university. I enjoyed my time there. It is a relatively short drive from Corpus Christi, San Antonio and the Rio Grande Valley. The 45-minute drive from Corpus Christi is nothing. I now live in the Silicon Valley. This morning, it took me 45 minutes to drive five miles on the 101.
Personally, I think that it comes down to recruitment, facilities and coaching. As the old adage goes, "you can't make money if you don't spend money." Texas A&M University-Kingsville needs to boost the athletic program. We need a team of scouts that can target real talent -- nationwide -- that might be overlooked elsewhere. This includes high schools, college football cuts and, yes, junior colleges. We need coaches who coach to the strengths of the team they've got. If you don't have a marquee passer, then implement a run option (or vice versa). While Einstein might not have really said it, it is insane to do the same thing repeatedly while expecting different results.
And, of course, we need great facilities. It is difficult to attach statistics to how lucrative a football program is to a school in terms of getting that school's name out. However, prospective students who visit the university do visit the stadium during college tours.
A few years ago, I was taking my sister-in-law around Stanford University. She was an incoming freshman. She -- along with other freshmen -- marveled at Stanford Stadium and the other athletic facilities. As beautiful as the Stanford campus might be, she said that this was when she first realized that she was going to a "big" school (and Stanford's undergraduate population is smaller than Texas A&M University-Kingsville's). What do prospective freshmen think when they see the seemingly ancient facilities in Kingsville?
Someone else pointed out that some premiere high schools in Texas have facilities better than Javelina Stadium. Even a minor face lift could help. The stadium could update the stands and add new locker rooms to the north and south end zones (wrapping around and connecting to the existing structures) to look more like "big name" school's stadium. The old locker rooms could be used for other sports too. This is a relatively nominal cost -- something that many of us would be willing to donate toward.
Not only is recruitment and new facilities (including facilities for the football team) important, but it is also important to tell potential recruits that you will do what you can to get them noticed elsewhere. The athletic department needs to follow through with this too. The school should do whatever it can to help potential NFL draftees be "seen" by NFL scouts. This is where highlight reels come in handy.
I got my hair cut at a Sport Clips in San Mateo during lunch today. The barber is a huge football fan. He has a family member who is a scout for the 49ers. He laughed that I am a Cowboys fan living in the Bay Area. However, he respected my willingness to admit as much (especially after last night's game). I brought up the fact that I once met John Randle. This became a segue in which we discussed small schools. This guy knew his stuff. He knew about A&M-Kingsville (and that it was formerly known as A&I). He knew about Gene Upshaw, Jermaine Mayberry, Darrel Green, Al Harris, Roberto Garza and, oddly enough, Eddie Moten. He said that the 49ers have a scouting ombudsman who acts as a contact for small schools.
When Coach Darren Wilkinson was hired, I was elated. He was coming from a National Championship team. For the first time in a while, I felt optimistic about the prospects for the Javelina football team. However, while I felt that he was (and is) an improvement over his predecessor, success has remained out-of-reach. I wonder how well Coach Wilkinson was vetted in regard to what he knows about how the Colorado State-Pueblo team was built. It isn't just about running plays. It's about recruiting the players who can be optimal for those plays (or, else, devise plays that play to the team's strengths).
Obviously, something needs to be done. The last truly great season for Javelina football was in 2010.
Comment