Performance Indicators 2016-17

[UIndyGradyGreyhound]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

I think both the GLIAC and GLVC will be very top-heavy this year, making for a lot of excitement throughout. The GLVC has some of the standard really good teams looking the part again -- Bellarmine, Southern Indiana, Drury, UW-Parkside -- as well as some others who have been loitering but look like they have the right mix of upperclassmen/intangibles that are ready to compete this year -- Truman, Quincy, Missouri S&T(?).

Note this guy says NOTHING about the D-3 G-MAC and its bad teams.

[kwcpantherfan]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Note this guy says NOTHING about the D-3 G-MAC and its bad teams.

Also said NOTHING about UIndy.

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Wrapping up the weekend, here's the report. Notable news is that Findlay beat Ferris in OT, knocking them out of the frontrunner position. While having beaten 3 of the 5 worst teams (according to PI) on the road, USI seems to have taken over the top Midwest seed due to wins over KWC and Ashland, who have now exceeded the 75% threshhold.

9	Southern Indiana	Midwest	GLVC	6-0	100.00%	16.83	31.39%	59.97%
15	Saginaw Valley State	Midwest	GLIAC	6-0	100.00%	16.33	38.10%	56.83%
16	Drury	Midwest	GLVC	5-0	100.00%	16.20	44.17%	52.57%
17	Truman State	Midwest	GLVC	6-1	85.71%	16.14	45.29%	50.27%
23	Ferris State	Midwest	GLIAC	5-2	71.43%	15.71	65.31%	47.90%
37	Wayne State (Mich.)	Midwest	GLIAC	5-1	83.33%	15.00	41.07%	53.55%
46	Quincy	Midwest	GLVC	6-1	85.71%	14.71	36.37%	57.49%
48	Ashland	Midwest	GLIAC	4-1	80.00%	14.60	44.38%	47.21%
49	Bellarmine	Midwest	GLVC	6-1	85.71%	14.57	32.54%	63.66%
62	Missouri S&T	Midwest	GLVC	4-1	80.00%	14.20	46.17%	52.99%
66	Ohio Dominican	Midwest	GLIAC	5-2	71.43%	14.14	48.89%	50.41%
68	Kentucky Wesleyan	Midwest	GMAC	6-2	75.00%	14.13	45.83%	46.64%
70	Walsh	Midwest	GLIAC	6-1	85.71%	14.00	28.74%	62.58%
81	Wisconsin-Parkside	Midwest	GLVC	5-1	83.33%	13.67	38.36%	60.87%
81	Missouri-St. Louis	Midwest	GLVC	4-2	66.67%	13.67	55.79%	54.89%
98	Findlay	Midwest	GLIAC	4-2	66.67%	13.33	43.85%	58.75%
111	Hillsdale	Midwest	GLIAC	4-4	50.00%	13.00	54.09%	50.91%
111	Michigan Tech	Midwest	GLIAC	3-4	42.86%	13.00	65.56%	41.03%
137	Lake Superior State	Midwest	GLIAC	3-2	60.00%	12.20	44.21%	50.90%
145	Lewis	Midwest	GLVC	4-4	50.00%	12.00	56.55%	54.66%
168	Saint Joseph's	Midwest	GLVC	3-4	42.86%	11.57	54.05%	50.24%
173	Northern Michigan	Midwest	GLIAC	2-4	33.33%	11.50	68.15%	40.74%
200	Rockhurst	Midwest	GLVC	2-4	33.33%	10.67	60.52%	47.35%
204	William Jewell	Midwest	GLVC	3-4	42.86%	10.57	49.29%	50.24%
210	Indianapolis	Midwest	GLVC	2-5	28.57%	10.43	50.95%	48.02%
213	Grand Valley State	Midwest	GLIAC	2-4	33.33%	10.33	58.83%	48.91%
216	Ohio Valley	Midwest	GMAC	0-5	0.00%	10.20	81.43%	37.69%
219	Malone	Midwest	GMAC	2-4	33.33%	10.17	51.19%	44.55%
232	Cedarville	Midwest	GMAC	2-4	33.33%	9.67	55.52%	48.30%
258	Davis & Elkins	Midwest	GMAC	2-6	25.00%	9.00	48.71%	48.10%
271	Trevecca Nazarene	Midwest	GMAC	2-6	25.00%	8.25	49.26%	50.06%
276	Oakland City	Midwest	IND	0-2	0.00%	8.00	70.00%	37.44%
283	Northwood	Midwest	GLIAC	1-8	11.11%	7.89	61.22%	45.21%
285	Alderson Broaddus	Midwest	GMAC	1-6	14.29%	7.86	49.60%	42.92%
294	Maryville	Midwest	GLVC	1-7	12.50%	7.38	45.42%	50.25%
295	Lake Erie	Midwest	GLIAC	0-9	0.00%	7.33	62.30%	44.21%
296	Illinois Springfield	Midwest	GLVC	0-4	0.00%	7.25	71.43%	36.00%
296	McKendree	Midwest	GLVC	0-4	0.00%	7.25	67.68%	39.50%
306	Tiffin	Midwest	GLIAC	0-5	0.00%	6.40	49.22%	47.45%
308	Salem International	Midwest	IND	0-7	0.00%	6.14	50.51%	51.87%

[Horsepower]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

I appreciate these rankings each time they come out and thanks for all the work that goes into them. Sometimes its kinda hard to wrap your head around them and I was wondering. SVS beat Bellarmine by 2 points essentially on their home floor. How would the rankings be changed if that game when the other way?

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

I appreciate these rankings each time they come out and thanks for all the work that goes into them. Sometimes its kinda hard to wrap your head around them and I was wondering. SVS beat Bellarmine by 2 points essentially on their home floor. How would the rankings be changed if that game when the other way?

Good question - if that happened, I show that SVSU would drop to #55, 14.33. BU rises to #15, 16.29. Essentially, they trade positions in the Midwest.

[Tyler Madsen]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

schnautza, your work to compile this (which I'm sure you have it down to three clicks and a perfected science at this point), is greatly appreciated. One thread I definitely look forward to seeing bolded when I log onto the forum.

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

schnautza, your work to compile this (which I'm sure you have it down to three clicks and a perfected science at this point), is greatly appreciated. One thread I definitely look forward to seeing bolded when I log onto the forum.

Thanks, I appreciate that. I've got it down to a pretty good form now, though there is always room for improvement. I still have to delete any non-d2 games. I could probably set it up to automatically filter them out, but every now and then there is a typo on my source and I'm afraid that a real team would get skipped over! It takes me about 5 minutes a day to do this now, once I get past each season's initial setup with transitioning teams.

[Horsepower]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Good question - if that happened, I show that SVSU would drop to #55, 14.33. BU rises to #15, 16.29. Essentially, they trade positions in the Midwest.

Thanks. Is it cheating when I use your indicator when I am having a tough time with my weekly picks?.....LOL

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Thanks. Is it cheating when I use your indicator when I am having a tough time with my weekly picks?.....LOL

Only if you win :)

[kwcpantherfan]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

I think I found a minor flaw in your system. There should be a 100 point deduction made when a team loses at home by double digits to a 1-9 NAIA D2 team. I wouldn't be surprised if there were 3 or 4 high school teams in the Evansville/Owensboro area that could beat Ohio Valley right now. USI is going to absolutely obliterate them this weekend.

[kwcpantherfan]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

And let me just say, maybe you could classify that comment as "trolling" OVU ... but to be perfectly honest, as diehard a KWC fan as I am, if they were 0-6 and just lost at home to that team by 17 points I would be just as hard (probably harder) on them.

[UIndyGradyGreyhound]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

I think I found a minor flaw in your system. There should be a 100 point deduction made when a team loses at home by double digits to a 1-9 NAIA D2 team. I wouldn't be surprised if there were 3 or 4 high school teams in the Evansville/Owensboro area that could beat Ohio Valley right now. USI is going to absolutely obliterate them this weekend.

KWC is the best high school in Owensboro, right? Your making fun of others schools?

[kwcpantherfan]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

KWC is the best high school in Owensboro, right? Your making fun of others schools?

Nope, I'm saying their basketball team is really bad, which is completely different than when you come in talking down about the schools, towns, and people. That's all I'm saying about the subject, I'm not allowing you to draw me into hijacking another good thread with your idiocy.

And again, it's you're not your.

[Knightmoves]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Ohio Valley's PI is interesting, even though they have gotten creamed in every game, they are not that close to last in PI. They have played the toughest schedule in the region, bar none. Some of the good teams in the region obviously like scheduling them for an easy D2 win. I saw them play BU and frankly, they are the worst college basketball team I have seen in a long, long time. I think a guard for them had maybe the worst stat line I have ever seen in that game. He was 1 for 12 from the field and had 9 turnovers and played all 40 minutes. (Hey coach, could a sub really have done any worse?). They'll go anywhere and play anybody, so I have to give them some credit.

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

Remember last season when USI tucked their tails and ran out of Louisville with a 1 point win over OVU? "Quick, let's get on the bus and get out of here!"