Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Performance Indicators 2018-19

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Originally posted by DJ Silky Panties View Post
    Where does USI biggest win fare? Barry 150?
    As far as points go, Malone (142), LSSU (105), NMU (75), and Barry (97) are all worth 19 points.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

      I believe that Davenport is going to play in the GLIAC tournament. What happens if Davenport wins the GLIAC tournament? Who would get the automatic bid from the GLIAC? Obviously, there will be a team or teams that get an at large bid from the GLIAC, but the auto bid could have an effect on how many teams from the GLIAC make the tournament.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

        What PI statistic is the difference maker in allowing a one loss team with a SOS of 114 to jump an undefeated team with a SOS of 31?

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

          Originally posted by Horsepower View Post
          What PI statistic is the difference maker in allowing a one loss team with a SOS of 114 to jump an undefeated team with a SOS of 31?
          The main reason that Ashland is currently ahead of Bellarmine is their opponent's winning percentage. Although it's not directly from that. Ashland's average (the PI is an average) is slightly higher than BU because Ashland's opponents, on avergage, are in a higher winning bracket and thus games against them are worth more points. Bear in mind that even when a team doesn't play, their PI varies because their opponents may move into different winning percentage brackets. Bellarmine's PI actually went down when they beat S&T. The opponent's win percentage will probably tend to get closer together as the season closes, especially since there are a fair amount of mutual opponents. We have discussed before how "bracket creep" is one of the problems with the PI and one that is easily remedied by eliminating the brackets and just using an oppenent's winning percentage as a factor.

          Remember the usual disclaimer, PI is not the primary criterion for selection or seeding.

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

            Originally posted by Horsepower View Post
            What PI statistic is the difference maker in allowing a one loss team with a SOS of 114 to jump an undefeated team with a SOS of 31?
            Let's look at all the changes since 12/20. Bear with me, it's about to get mathy.

            Ashland - 14 games played:
            Previous opponent Seton Hill improved from 20% to 27.8%. This changed the points awarded from 12 to 15. Net effect = (15-12)/14 = +0.214
            Ashland picked up a 17 point win, which was higher than their previous average of 16.462. Net effect = (17-16.462)/14 = +0.038
            Total net change = +0.214 + 0.038 = +0.252
            So 16.462 + 0.252 = 16.714

            Bellarmine - 17 games played:
            Previous opponent Wayne State improved from 21.4% to 25%. This changed the points awarded from 12 to 15. Net effect = (15-12)/17 = +0.176
            Previous opponent Rockhurst fell from 50% to 43.8%. This changed the points awarded from 20 to 17. Net effect = (17-20)/17 = -0.176
            Bellarmine picked up two wins, valued at 15 and 12 points each, both below Bellarmine's previous average of 17.00. Net effect = (12+15 - 2*17.000)/17 = -0.412
            Total net change = +0.176 - 0.176 - 0.412 = -0.412
            So 17.000 - 0.412 = 16.588

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

              Originally posted by Knightmoves View Post
              I believe that Davenport is going to play in the GLIAC tournament. What happens if Davenport wins the GLIAC tournament? Who would get the automatic bid from the GLIAC? Obviously, there will be a team or teams that get an at large bid from the GLIAC, but the auto bid could have an effect on how many teams from the GLIAC make the tournament.
              Probably the runner-up.

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                Originally posted by schnautza View Post
                As far as points go, Malone (142), LSSU (105), NMU (75), and Barry (97) are all worth 19 points.
                WoDs biggest 3 wins all lost again last night.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                  Let's see this now?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                    10 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 17-1 94.44% 16.00 44.38% 53.57% 17-1 94.44%
                    14 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 14-3 82.35% 15.59 46.01% 52.43% 12-3 80.00%
                    15 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 13-3 81.25% 15.56 50.60% 51.15% 13-3 81.25%
                    17 Findlay Midwest GMAC 17-3 85.00% 15.55 44.65% 51.59% 17-3 85.00%
                    32 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 15-5 75.00% 14.65 47.79% 50.69% 15-5 75.00%
                    34 Lewis Midwest GLVC 12-4 75.00% 14.63 47.16% 52.38% 12-4 75.00%
                    42 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 12-4 75.00% 14.44 46.17% 53.17% 12-2 85.71%
                    47 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 13-5 72.22% 14.33 48.85% 51.85% 12-5 70.59%
                    56 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 12-4 75.00% 14.13 48.25% 51.42% 12-4 75.00%
                    60 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 12-8 60.00% 14.05 54.88% 51.02% 12-8 60.00%
                    74 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 12-7 63.16% 13.58 49.15% 49.78% 12-6 66.67%
                    76 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 12-8 60.00% 13.50 53.58% 50.71% 12-8 60.00%
                    87 Walsh Midwest GMAC 10-7 58.82% 13.12 46.86% 49.88% 10-7 58.82%
                    89 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 11-9 55.00% 12.95 51.04% 50.08% 10-8 55.56%
                    99 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 10-9 52.63% 12.74 50.59% 49.72% 10-9 52.63%
                    100 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 10-8 55.56% 12.72 49.99% 52.39% 8-8 50.00%
                    105 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 11-9 55.00% 12.65 47.19% 52.33% 11-9 55.00%
                    107 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 9-8 52.94% 12.59 52.24% 51.05% 9-6 60.00%
                    118 Truman State Midwest GLVC 9-11 45.00% 12.45 60.91% 49.83% 9-11 45.00%
                    118 Malone Midwest GMAC 11-9 55.00% 12.45 47.27% 49.25% 11-9 55.00%
                    121 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 10-8 55.56% 12.44 50.31% 50.28% 9-8 52.94%
                    134 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 10-9 52.63% 12.16 47.87% 51.31% 9-9 50.00%
                    147 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 8-12 40.00% 11.95 57.67% 50.26% 7-11 38.89%
                    159 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 10-10 50.00% 11.75 45.35% 49.23% 10-10 50.00%
                    173 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 8-10 44.44% 11.44 52.43% 50.21% 8-10 44.44%
                    176 Drury Midwest GLVC 8-10 44.44% 11.39 52.53% 50.52% 8-6 57.14%
                    205 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 6-10 37.50% 10.63 51.26% 48.10% 6-10 37.50%
                    213 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 4-13 23.53% 10.24 60.54% 50.20% 4-13 23.53%
                    218 Salem Midwest IND 9-8 52.94% 10.12 36.53% 50.53% 8-8 50.00%
                    223 McKendree Midwest GLVC 5-12 29.41% 10.00 53.56% 49.99% 5-11 31.25%
                    231 Maryville Midwest GLVC 6-11 35.29% 9.88 48.96% 51.37% 6-11 35.29%
                    236 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 6-15 28.57% 9.81 52.07% 48.81% 4-15 21.05%
                    237 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 5-13 27.78% 9.78 56.53% 50.17% 5-13 27.78%
                    239 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 5-12 29.41% 9.71 51.16% 48.84% 5-12 29.41%
                    246 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-13 27.78% 9.56 54.07% 49.68% 5-13 27.78%
                    258 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 5-14 26.32% 9.32 53.56% 50.42% 5-12 29.41%
                    260 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 5-14 26.32% 9.16 48.48% 48.37% 5-14 26.32%
                    282 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 8.20 64.68% 44.10% 0-1 0.00%
                    284 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 3-15 16.67% 8.00 49.00% 52.27% 3-15 16.67%
                    295 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-14 6.67% 7.27 52.42% 48.03% 1-14 6.67%
                    300 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 1-15 6.25% 6.88 53.24% 50.64% 1-15 6.25%

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                      10 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 14-3 82.35% 15.82 50.68% 51.29% 14-3 82.35%
                      11 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 17-2 89.47% 15.74 46.52% 53.18% 17-2 89.47%
                      13 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 15-3 83.33% 15.72 46.02% 52.36% 13-3 81.25%
                      17 Findlay Midwest GMAC 17-3 85.00% 15.40 44.92% 51.59% 17-3 85.00%
                      35 Lewis Midwest GLVC 13-4 76.47% 14.65 49.31% 52.08% 13-4 76.47%
                      36 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 14-5 73.68% 14.63 50.13% 51.50% 13-5 72.22%
                      42 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 15-5 75.00% 14.50 47.72% 50.73% 15-5 75.00%
                      56 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 13-4 76.47% 14.12 45.51% 51.42% 13-4 76.47%
                      60 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 12-5 70.59% 13.94 48.24% 52.77% 12-3 80.00%
                      70 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 12-9 57.14% 13.67 56.33% 50.80% 12-9 57.14%
                      74 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 13-8 61.90% 13.43 52.25% 51.36% 13-8 61.90%
                      85 Walsh Midwest GMAC 11-7 61.11% 13.17 46.03% 49.75% 11-7 61.11%
                      87 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 12-8 60.00% 13.05 50.18% 49.69% 12-7 63.16%
                      88 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 12-9 57.14% 13.00 50.61% 50.10% 11-8 57.89%
                      92 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 11-9 55.00% 12.95 51.19% 49.67% 11-9 55.00%
                      101 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 11-8 57.89% 12.68 48.42% 52.81% 9-8 52.94%
                      113 Malone Midwest GMAC 12-9 57.14% 12.52 47.52% 49.17% 12-9 57.14%
                      114 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 9-9 50.00% 12.50 53.92% 50.57% 9-7 56.25%
                      118 Truman State Midwest GLVC 9-11 45.00% 12.45 60.94% 49.73% 9-11 45.00%
                      131 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 9-12 42.86% 12.19 56.66% 50.52% 8-11 42.11%
                      151 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 11-10 52.38% 11.76 45.78% 52.07% 11-10 52.38%
                      152 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 10-9 52.63% 11.74 50.29% 50.29% 9-9 50.00%
                      159 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 9-10 47.37% 11.63 52.54% 50.42% 9-10 47.37%
                      161 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 10-10 50.00% 11.55 48.10% 51.45% 9-10 47.37%
                      166 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 10-11 47.62% 11.48 45.41% 49.29% 10-11 47.62%
                      168 Drury Midwest GLVC 9-10 47.37% 11.42 51.29% 50.60% 9-6 60.00%
                      206 Salem Midwest IND 10-8 55.56% 10.50 37.25% 50.65% 9-8 52.94%
                      218 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-12 33.33% 10.22 51.75% 49.78% 6-11 35.29%
                      220 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 6-11 35.29% 10.18 52.55% 48.11% 6-11 35.29%
                      228 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 4-14 22.22% 9.94 60.12% 50.42% 4-14 22.22%
                      239 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 5-14 26.32% 9.68 56.35% 50.17% 5-14 26.32%
                      245 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 5-12 29.41% 9.53 51.51% 48.94% 5-12 29.41%
                      251 Maryville Midwest GLVC 6-12 33.33% 9.44 48.81% 51.21% 6-12 33.33%
                      254 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-13 27.78% 9.39 53.92% 49.76% 5-13 27.78%
                      255 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 6-16 27.27% 9.32 50.46% 48.80% 4-16 20.00%
                      270 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 5-15 25.00% 8.70 52.43% 50.56% 5-13 27.78%
                      270 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 5-15 25.00% 8.70 49.48% 48.26% 5-15 25.00%
                      274 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-15 21.05% 8.63 48.69% 51.70% 4-15 21.05%
                      285 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 2-14 12.50% 7.75 50.71% 48.48% 2-14 12.50%
                      288 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 7.60 64.31% 44.99% 0-1 0.00%
                      300 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 1-16 5.88% 6.82 54.64% 50.54% 1-16 5.88%

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                        I know the PI alone isn't an end all, be all, but I can't see how there isn't a completely definitive top 8 at this moment. Even though UIndy and Ferris are only 10 spots apart nationally in the PI, there's no way a team with nine regional losses is even in the same stratosphere of a conversation with a team with three or four losses.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                          Originally posted by TSU_Mike59 View Post
                          I know the PI alone isn't an end all, be all, but I can't see how there isn't a completely definitive top 8 at this moment. Even though UIndy and Ferris are only 10 spots apart nationally in the PI, there's no way a team with nine regional losses is even in the same stratosphere of a conversation with a team with three or four losses.
                          I'm assuming you are excluding Davenport for your top 8. I would have to agree with you, however, we've seen USI crash and burn at the end of season a couple times recently. I hate to say it, but you can't count that possibility out just yet (or any of the others for that matter).

                          Walsh is still hanging down there as a 7-loss team as well.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                            Originally posted by schnautza View Post
                            I'm assuming you are excluding Davenport for your top 8. I would have to agree with you, however, we've seen USI crash and burn at the end of season a couple times recently. I hate to say it, but you can't count that possibility out just yet (or any of the others for that matter).

                            Walsh is still hanging down there as a 7-loss team as well.
                            Yes, sorry. I've just trained myself to tip my cap with appreciation for the season they are having but then dismiss them just as quickly. Which honestly, is a huge bummer for them because this is obviously the year you want to be in contention for a top spot, unlike other years when there's just been a dominant team no one can touch.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                              Schnautza, any chance you could post the full rankings in the General Discussion?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

                                12 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 16-3 84.21% 15.68 44.66% 52.29% 14-3 82.35%
                                13 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 17-3 85.00% 15.65 47.76% 52.80% 17-3 85.00%
                                14 Findlay Midwest GMAC 18-3 85.71% 15.62 46.74% 51.12% 18-3 85.71%
                                17 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 14-4 77.78% 15.39 51.49% 50.92% 14-4 77.78%
                                25 Lewis Midwest GLVC 14-4 77.78% 15.00 50.92% 52.00% 14-4 77.78%
                                25 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 13-5 72.22% 15.00 50.84% 52.32% 13-3 81.25%
                                38 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 14-6 70.00% 14.45 51.37% 51.53% 13-6 68.42%
                                43 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 15-6 71.43% 14.38 50.17% 50.08% 15-6 71.43%
                                54 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 13-5 72.22% 14.11 46.05% 50.73% 13-5 72.22%
                                67 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 13-9 59.09% 13.59 54.54% 51.53% 13-9 59.09%
                                70 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 14-8 63.64% 13.50 51.55% 51.99% 14-8 63.64%
                                85 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 13-8 61.90% 13.14 49.05% 50.00% 13-7 65.00%
                                86 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 12-8 60.00% 13.10 49.62% 52.84% 10-8 55.56%
                                89 Walsh Midwest GMAC 12-7 63.16% 13.05 45.61% 49.55% 12-7 63.16%
                                96 Truman State Midwest GLVC 10-11 47.62% 12.86 59.16% 50.14% 10-11 47.62%
                                97 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 11-9 55.00% 12.80 51.32% 49.50% 11-9 55.00%
                                99 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 13-9 59.09% 12.77 48.79% 50.30% 12-8 60.00%
                                109 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 10-9 52.63% 12.58 53.44% 50.25% 10-7 58.82%
                                131 Malone Midwest GMAC 12-10 54.55% 12.05 46.87% 49.13% 12-10 54.55%
                                136 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 10-10 50.00% 11.95 51.47% 50.45% 10-10 50.00%
                                140 Drury Midwest GLVC 10-10 50.00% 11.90 52.05% 50.36% 10-6 62.50%
                                152 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 9-13 40.91% 11.73 57.01% 50.86% 8-12 40.00%
                                161 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 11-11 50.00% 11.50 46.13% 52.18% 11-11 50.00%
                                164 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 10-10 50.00% 11.40 49.05% 50.33% 9-10 47.37%
                                170 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 10-11 47.62% 11.29 47.21% 52.10% 9-11 45.00%
                                184 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 10-12 45.45% 10.95 46.36% 48.87% 10-12 45.45%
                                210 Salem Midwest IND 10-8 55.56% 10.33 37.32% 50.46% 9-8 52.94%
                                222 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 5-14 26.32% 10.00 59.24% 50.59% 5-14 26.32%
                                231 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-13 31.58% 9.79 51.55% 49.57% 6-12 33.33%
                                233 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 6-12 33.33% 9.61 51.32% 48.14% 6-12 33.33%
                                234 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 5-15 25.00% 9.60 56.47% 50.40% 5-15 25.00%
                                243 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 6-15 28.57% 9.43 52.42% 50.53% 6-13 31.58%
                                247 Maryville Midwest GLVC 6-13 31.58% 9.37 46.52% 50.78% 6-13 31.58%
                                249 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-14 26.32% 9.32 53.33% 50.37% 5-14 26.32%
                                251 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 5-13 27.78% 9.28 51.77% 48.93% 5-13 27.78%
                                253 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 7-16 30.43% 9.26 48.93% 49.30% 5-16 23.81%
                                258 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 6-15 28.57% 9.00 49.80% 48.18% 6-15 28.57%
                                266 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-16 20.00% 8.75 50.64% 50.92% 4-16 20.00%
                                290 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 7.60 64.28% 44.74% 0-1 0.00%
                                292 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 2-16 11.11% 7.44 52.60% 50.67% 2-16 11.11%
                                295 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 2-15 11.76% 7.29 51.53% 48.22% 2-15 11.76%

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X