Performance Indicators 2018-19

[Knightmoves]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Another dumb question from me......Is the Performance Indicators the only ranking used to rank the teams, or is there still a human element involved? Sorry if this has been answered before.

The PI is supposedly only one crterion of many used by the committee. It does a fairly good job of forecasting the selections.

[MidwestHoops]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

The PI is supposedly only one crterion of many used by the committee. It does a fairly good job of forecasting the selections.

That's what I thought but wasn't sure. I know the criteria changes a little every year. Thanks for answering.

[KleShreen]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Davenport not post season eligible until 19-20 season. Which I suppose means not gliac mini tourney eligible either.

They are eligible for GLIAC Tournament. Not NCAA Tournament, though.

Their women's team was the #8 seed in last season's GLIAC Tourney.

[BellarmineGrad]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Heh, looks like the PI here in our distinguished forum got cited:
https://www.courierpress.com/story/s...wn/2431309002/

"."

[SonOfMafia]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Just like every year, for the most part, we have the talent, just not the coaching staff to get us to the next level.

[glvcpro]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Heh, looks like the PI here in our distinguished forum got cited:
https://www.courierpress.com/story/s...wn/2431309002/

"."

USI basketball good shape non conference winds down...what will the headline be tomorrow? USI basketball fools gold once again!

[SonOfMafia]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

And welcome back to the world of Wod basketball! Pathetic!

[Knightmoves]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Some significant and interesting games in the region last night. Truman beating Lewis at home is huge. Surprised by NMU losing to Wayne State and Jewell over Drury. Davenport continues to surprise with a win over LSSU. Ferris with a good win over GVSU. Not surprisingly, BU and Ashland won.

Future GLVC member Lindenwood absolutely mauled #25 Missouri Southern last night in out of region action. Lindenwood is going to be a strong addition to the league.

[schnautza]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

1	Ashland	Midwest	GLIAC	9-0	100.00%	18.67	56.92%	50.05%	9-0	100.00%
4	Bellarmine	Midwest	GLVC	11-0	100.00%	17.64	48.72%	57.21%	11-0	100.00%
14	Findlay	Midwest	GMAC	11-2	84.62%	15.77	44.31%	54.04%	11-2	84.62%
26	Lewis	Midwest	GLVC	7-2	77.78%	15.22	51.75%	56.29%	7-2	77.78%
34	Indianapolis	Midwest	GLVC	6-3	66.67%	14.78	54.15%	56.14%	6-1	85.71%
37	Davenport	Midwest	GLIAC	8-2	80.00%	14.70	43.32%	53.79%	6-2	75.00%
60	Truman State	Midwest	GLVC	6-6	50.00%	14.08	69.40%	49.01%	6-6	50.00%
65	Missouri-St. Louis	Midwest	GLVC	6-3	66.67%	13.89	58.86%	50.66%	6-3	66.67%
68	Ferris State	Midwest	GLIAC	7-6	53.85%	13.85	61.08%	50.88%	7-6	53.85%
74	Southern Indiana	Midwest	GLVC	7-4	63.64%	13.55	53.56%	53.48%	6-4	60.00%
76	Northern Michigan	Midwest	GLIAC	8-5	61.54%	13.54	52.99%	53.60%	8-5	61.54%
90	Ohio Dominican	Midwest	GMAC	7-4	63.64%	13.09	47.07%	53.26%	7-4	63.64%
90	Lake Superior State	Midwest	GLIAC	6-5	54.55%	13.09	54.80%	52.82%	4-5	44.44%
94	Hillsdale	Midwest	GMAC	8-5	61.54%	12.92	46.36%	51.90%	8-5	61.54%
103	Cedarville	Midwest	GMAC	7-6	53.85%	12.77	48.16%	52.34%	6-5	54.55%
106	Illinois Springfield	Midwest	GLVC	6-4	60.00%	12.70	49.34%	50.86%	5-4	55.56%
116	Grand Valley State	Midwest	GLIAC	8-5	61.54%	12.46	42.92%	56.30%	8-5	61.54%
121	Walsh	Midwest	GMAC	6-5	54.55%	12.36	46.74%	50.50%	6-5	54.55%
129	Rockhurst	Midwest	GLVC	6-5	54.55%	12.27	45.59%	50.26%	6-5	54.55%
132	Lake Erie	Midwest	GMAC	7-6	53.85%	12.15	52.67%	50.26%	7-5	58.33%
145	Michigan Tech	Midwest	GLIAC	7-5	58.33%	11.75	40.62%	54.54%	6-5	54.55%
155	Kentucky Wesleyan	Midwest	GMAC	5-5	50.00%	11.60	47.46%	47.96%	5-5	50.00%
163	Malone	Midwest	GMAC	7-7	50.00%	11.43	47.61%	48.77%	7-7	50.00%
168	Wayne State (Mich.)	Midwest	GLIAC	3-7	30.00%	11.30	66.51%	49.60%	3-7	30.00%
172	Alderson Broaddus	Midwest	GMAC	6-7	46.15%	11.23	46.46%	49.22%	6-7	46.15%
180	McKendree	Midwest	GLVC	3-6	33.33%	11.11	57.87%	49.39%	3-5	37.50%
207	Northwood	Midwest	GLIAC	4-9	30.77%	10.62	57.42%	50.52%	3-8	27.27%
214	Quincy	Midwest	GLVC	3-7	30.00%	10.40	60.12%	47.83%	3-7	30.00%
218	Salem	Midwest	IND	6-6	50.00%	10.33	41.12%	48.13%	5-6	45.45%
221	Saginaw Valley State	Midwest	GLIAC	3-7	30.00%	10.30	58.93%	50.54%	3-7	30.00%
228	Wisconsin-Parkside	Midwest	GLIAC	3-7	30.00%	10.20	55.04%	47.03%	3-5	37.50%
244	Maryville	Midwest	GLVC	3-7	30.00%	9.50	56.31%	50.51%	3-7	30.00%
248	Ohio Valley	Midwest	GMAC	3-6	33.33%	9.44	47.98%	49.87%	3-6	33.33%
249	William Jewell	Midwest	GLVC	4-8	33.33%	9.42	45.14%	50.94%	4-6	40.00%
251	Tiffin	Midwest	GMAC	4-10	28.57%	9.36	49.97%	50.08%	2-10	16.67%
258	Drury	Midwest	GLVC	3-7	30.00%	9.10	49.74%	47.38%	3-3	50.00%
278	Trevecca Nazarene	Midwest	GMAC	1-8	11.11%	8.11	51.61%	46.14%	1-8	11.11%
279	Purdue Northwest	Midwest	GLIAC	2-9	18.18%	8.09	47.35%	48.52%	2-9	18.18%
285	Davis & Elkins	Midwest	GMAC	2-10	16.67%	7.67	52.19%	47.82%	2-10	16.67%
286	Oakland City	Midwest	IND	0-5	0.00%	7.60	63.02%	42.62%	0-1	0.00%
301	Missouri S&T	Midwest	GLVC	0-8	0.00%	5.63	47.90%	47.80%	0-8	0.00%

[SonOfMafia]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

USI...outside looking in...again.

[DJ Silky Panties]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

USI...outside looking in...again.

[KnightStalker]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

USI...outside looking in...again.

Can't count them out yet (although your lack of confidence is quite understandable.) Their four losses are to quality teams (King being the weakest) and they have a couple of big wins still. Lack a true road victory over a quality opponent, although the way Maryville played over the weekend, that could count by the end if they continue to play like that. A road victory over Indy or Lewis and no more clunkers against low quality opponents(big if, I know) and USI is back in the top 6.

[TSU_Mike59]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

USI...outside looking in...again.

Keep "woe is me"-ing it, but if you look closely, Truman and Ferris State already have six regional losses each (I would argue the committee should look more closely at Truman, since four of those came without their best player, Brodric Thomas, in the first four games of the year - three against teams that are going to make the NCAA tournament, but I digress), and Davenport isn't eligible, so being in the "upper middle" of the region isn't as punishing this year as perhaps it has been in years past. We just don't have the glut of top-tier teams, largely because of the GLIAC appearing to be a little bit less top heavy than in years past.

[SonOfMafia]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Truman is better than USI!

[UFOILERFAN]

Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

Parkside beats Ashland 68-61