Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Video: Should Division II Overhaul the Playoff System? - with Mike Racy

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brandon
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    An MIAA team has never set foot in PA.
    Nevermind. I thought the reply was to Kle (GV).

    Do you know of any times a PSAC teams has played an MIAA team outside of IUP in 1999 and West Chester in 2004?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brandon
    replied
    Originally posted by GorillaTeacher View Post

    You can't just assume SR1 is as competitive as the other regions when you keep getting blown out in the playoffs.Any single football season is not independent from one year to the next. You may have individual teams get the bounce in isolated contests, but as a whole of the competition the law of averages bears fruit.
    Part of the reason there is momentum for change is because of the most recent results in the semifinals. SR1 has been struggled in the last three semifinal games, outscored by an average score of 52-12.

    Since the regions were realigned, these are the results.

    SR Score Ave. Opp. Ave.
    1 76 (15.2) 214 (42.8)
    2 136 (27.2) 124 (24.8)
    3 166 (33.2) 108 (21.6)
    4 189 (37.8) 121 (24.2)

    Leave a comment:


  • GorillaTeacher
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    An MIAA team has never set foot in PA.
    Doesn't mean they didn't call. We already know you spout lies and mis-truths, why should we trust you when you say they never called?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ram Tough
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    No Conference should have more than 2 anyway. I’m not buying the third place team in certain conferences are that deserving. Most of the time a third or 4th Pee Sack team is overkill. It should have just been IUP and Shepherd this past season.
    I'm not arguing that at all, but the PSAC is like two conferences in one. If I had my way, the East and West would only meet the last week of the season, and the first three weeks would be for non-conference games.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Ram Tough View Post

    This is one reason why I think very little will be done outside of regional realignment. It's one thing to guarantee a conference a spot, but it's another to make to tell those conferences that it will be more difficult to get a second or even third team in.
    No Conference should have more than 2 anyway. I’m not buying the third place team in certain conferences are that deserving. Most of the time a third or 4th Pee Sack team is overkill. It should have just been IUP and Shepherd this past season.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Brandon View Post

    I think they did.
    An MIAA team has never set foot in PA.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by GorillaTeacher View Post

    You can't just assume SR1 is as competitive as the other regions when you keep getting blown out in the playoffs.Any single football season is not independent from one year to the next. You may have individual teams get the bounce in isolated contests, but as a whole of the competition the law of averages bears fruit.
    You guys are just proving me right that this is
    about making sure every semi final game for the next 20 years takes place in the Midwest. You act as if every game is a blowout. So when you team gets blown out in the future does that reset the narrative for them and now you suck again and must go back on the road and prove yourselves or do you get to rest your laurels in past history?
    Last edited by IUPNation; 03-03-2023, 10:52 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ram Tough
    replied
    Originally posted by Brandon View Post

    Won't happen. Part of a change will likely include automatic inclusion for conference champions.
    This is one reason why I think very little will be done outside of regional realignment. It's one thing to guarantee a conference a spot, but it's another to tell those conferences that it will be more difficult to get a second or even third team in.

    Leave a comment:


  • GorillaTeacher
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    Your conference obviously feels that being home in every game in the playoffs is their right…
    Not at all true, I think the numbers provided an argument between Ferris and Pitt having an equal claim to that home game. I think the actual contest backed that idea up. Until the MIAA kills their silo entirely, we are handicapping our .SOS. You get no one from these conferences saying that they SHOULD have the home games, they are saying the better team should have the home teams, let that be who it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brandon
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    But good luck getting the NE10, Pee Sack, MEC, GMAC, CIAA, SAC and the SIAC to give up potential playoff bids.
    Won't happen. Part of a change will likely include automatic inclusion for conference champions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brandon
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    Your school could have called us and traveled to PA.
    I think they did.

    Leave a comment:


  • GorillaTeacher
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    Go on the road. Typical.
    You can't just assume SR1 is as competitive as the other regions when you keep getting blown out in the playoffs.Any single football season is not independent from one year to the next. You may have individual teams get the bounce in isolated contests, but as a whole of the competition the law of averages bears fruit.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Predatory Primates View Post

    I don't see why safeguards couldn't be put in place to ensure the better team gets to host?

    The NE has not spit out a legit top 4 seed in forever. That will change at some point, too. When it does, the best way to kill that bias is to go on the road and kick the crap out of the high seed. That's what Pitt did in the early 90s when they played in a bad conference. It instantly swung the bias in their favor. That's also what RMAC teams did in the not so distant past.
    Go on the road. Typical.

    Leave a comment:


  • Predatory Primates
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    Yes it does. The chances of an undefeated team from the Northeast getting a top 4 seed and home field advantage will be small when the bias in favor of Midwestern and GSC teams comes into play. It will be just assumed they didn’t play anyone and gets slotted 5th….
    I don't see why safeguards couldn't be put in place to ensure the better team gets to host?

    The NE has not spit out a legit top 4 seed in forever. That will change at some point, too. When it does, the best way to kill that bias is to go on the road and kick the crap out of the high seed. That's what Pitt did in the early 90s when they played in a bad conference. It instantly swung the bias in their favor. That's also what RMAC teams did in the not so distant past.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Predatory Primates View Post

    It has been illustrated here how a change to the FCS system would do none of the things you are fear mongering about above. Not sure why you are still selling when nobody is buying. At least change your sales pitch.

    The current system will change at some point. I guarantee it. It may get worse. It may get better? NCAA is glacial as it's made up of academics with no sense of urgency, but change is coming for sure.
    Yes it does. The chances of an undefeated team from the Northeast getting a top 4 seed and home field advantage will be small when the bias in favor of Midwestern and GSC teams comes into play. It will be just assumed they didn’t play anyone and gets slotted 5th….

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X