Originally posted by tsull
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FCS schools have to pay $$$ to help Power 4
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Yes.Originally posted by GorillaTeacher View PostNo.
Federal and state funds do not fund athletic scholarships. Can an athlete get a Pell Grant in D2? Yes, but it's not an athletic scholarship. Can a D2 athlete fill out a FAFSA? Yes, but it's not an athletic scholarship. Again, federal funds do not go towards athletic scholarships, to think so is amazingly wrong.
Comment
-
I know federal funds can't be used for athletics scholarships, but I thought a few states did allow state funding for athletic scholarships. I know Pennsylvania doesn't allow for that, but Missouri, for example, does.Originally posted by tsull View Post
Yes.
Federal and state funds do not fund athletic scholarships. Can an athlete get a Pell Grant in D2? Yes, but it's not an athletic scholarship. Can a D2 athlete fill out a FAFSA? Yes, but it's not an athletic scholarship. Again, federal funds do not go towards athletic scholarships, to think so is amazingly wrong.Cal U (Pa.) Class of 2014
Comment
-
Athletic funding may come from student fees, but not federal funds as stated her. Also, in all of the schools I've been around, student fees do not go towards scholarships, they go towards the sports in general, travel, uniforms, facilities, etc. Athletic scholarships are still funded by boosters and donations. Now, can coaches encourage Pell Grants, loans, etc., yes. In D2 that's probably crucial. But the feds are not funding scholarships and neither are the states.Originally posted by GorillaTeacher View PostI don’t think Missouri does. Kansas does not. Still, the vast majority of athletic funding comes from student fees.
Comment
-
Remember, your D1 athlete gets a scholarship worth $100K minimum per year when one factors in room and board, tuition, counselors, tutors, nutrition, free travel, free gear, etc. If the Dartmouth dudes win, scholarships leave (Dartmouth doesn't get athletic scholarships anyway ... this is what the Dartmouth frat boys don't like). If the student athletes are employed, colleges could set the scale at minimum wage like most work study students. They also must sign contracts, have sick days, vacation days, and yes, be fired immediately, not at the end of the season. Also, being taken out of the paycheck are State and federal taxes. Thirty hours a week at minimum wage? I'd rather have the scholarship ... guess those Ivy guys aren't very bright. I'd guess most student-athletes would make under $20K in their new model.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Schools that are allowed to pay, or perhaps required to pay, can pay or not pay what they want, provided it is within employment law. In California, those laws are very different than Oklahoma, etc. It's all a matter of how competitive they want to be, just like any other business.Originally posted by tsull View PostRemember, your D1 athlete gets a scholarship worth $100K minimum per year when one factors in room and board, tuition, counselors, tutors, nutrition, free travel, free gear, etc. If the Dartmouth dudes win, scholarships leave (Dartmouth doesn't get athletic scholarships anyway ... this is what the Dartmouth frat boys don't like). If the student athletes are employed, colleges could set the scale at minimum wage like most work study students. They also must sign contracts, have sick days, vacation days, and yes, be fired immediately, not at the end of the season. Also, being taken out of the paycheck are State and federal taxes. Thirty hours a week at minimum wage? I'd rather have the scholarship ... guess those Ivy guys aren't very bright. I'd guess most student-athletes would make under $20K in their new model.
Comment
-
I have no doubt that the unions will be all over this, and the union collective bargaining officials will end up with a lot more clout than the coaches and ADs. I foresee many programs just throwing in the towel.Originally posted by tsull View PostRemember, your D1 athlete gets a scholarship worth $100K minimum per year when one factors in room and board, tuition, counselors, tutors, nutrition, free travel, free gear, etc. If the Dartmouth dudes win, scholarships leave (Dartmouth doesn't get athletic scholarships anyway ... this is what the Dartmouth frat boys don't like). If the student athletes are employed, colleges could set the scale at minimum wage like most work study students. They also must sign contracts, have sick days, vacation days, and yes, be fired immediately, not at the end of the season. Also, being taken out of the paycheck are State and federal taxes. Thirty hours a week at minimum wage? I'd rather have the scholarship ... guess those Ivy guys aren't very bright. I'd guess most student-athletes would make under $20K in their new model.Last edited by Eagle74; 05-29-2024, 02:57 PM.
Comment
-
Most will convert to a non-athletic scholarship model and call it good. That's the path of least resistance by 1000X.Originally posted by Eagle74 View Post
I have no doubt that the unions will be all over this, and the union collective bargaining officials will end up with a lot more clout than the coaches and ADs. I foresee many programs just throwing in the towel.
Comment
-
You’re telling me that universities that have hundreds of employees can’t don’t have a personal department that could handle this?Originally posted by MooseLodge View Post
It might also be the only viable option to save programs. What universities will have the brain trust and funds to navigate this minefield?
Comment
Ad3
Collapse

Comment