Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will there be a season?

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MrsThortonMelon
    replied
    Originally posted by bigmrg74 View Post

    Tis possible. The Private schools would have a harder time with lower enrollment numbers than the public schools. Not exactly the way I would want to see Findlay and Hillsdale back into the GLIAC fold, but it could happen.
    Personally I would like to see either or both teams back in the GLIAC but lets also remember that Hillsdale pretty much led the charge to leave the GLIAC and talked other Presidents into it...tough to think that the GLIAC would exactly welcome them back with open arms...but if we miss this football season there are at least half the schools that will be cutting programs and perhaps some will include football also as it is a big expense. Tech dropped football before..they have hockey so its all good...Northwood? Support from car industry has to be getting interesting...I could see Ashland if they are as hurting as people say...I could see GVSU dropping some non rev sports to stay afloat...I could see that at lots of schools...very grim out look for some programs...

    Leave a comment:


  • unc4life
    replied
    If schools are not back on campus in September, there are several private schools in Ohio that will not be ok. Lake Erie,Malone, Urbana all will be in trouble. I think all private schools will have some hit either way. I know Ashland already implemented pay cuts for most of their employees to try and get ahead of what is to come.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmrg74
    replied
    Originally posted by UFOILERFAN View Post

    Including several in the GMAC. We might be knocking on your door sooner than you think.
    Tis possible. The Private schools would have a harder time with lower enrollment numbers than the public schools. Not exactly the way I would want to see Findlay and Hillsdale back into the GLIAC fold, but it could happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • UFOILERFAN
    replied
    Originally posted by bigmrg74 View Post

    Heck, there's probably schools out there that could very well go belly up themselves if they're not back on campus by next September. If a kid has to sit at home for his Freshman 101 classes, they could just as well do that from say some online program at a Junior college verses some 4 year schools. Not getting those freshman on campus this fall could really affect a lot of schools's long term viability if they're not getting the numbers to keep their doors open.
    Including several in the GMAC. We might be knocking on your door sooner than you think.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmrg74
    replied
    Originally posted by champgymusa View Post

    If schools are not person to person in September football is done...at least for this year...and for many schools with a thin cash flow it might be the death of sports...sad as hell...
    Heck, there's probably schools out there that could very well go belly up themselves if they're not back on campus by next September. If a kid has to sit at home for his Freshman 101 classes, they could just as well do that from say some online program at a Junior college verses some 4 year schools. Not getting those freshman on campus this fall could really affect a lot of schools's long term viability if they're not getting the numbers to keep their doors open.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mk63NuclearBomb
    replied
    If y'all need something to watch, r/CFB is streaming some games on NCAA 14 throughout the day

    Texas @ Kansas in progress

    UConn @ Rutgers 1:15

    Boise State @ Memphis 2:30

    UGA @ UF 3:45 (World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party)

    Texas Tech @ Penn St. 5:00

    WVU @Pitt 6:15 (Backyard Brawl)

    UCF @ Alabama 7:30

    Nebraska @ Oklahoma 8:45 (Game of the Century rematch)

    Washington @ Oregon 10:00 (Border War)

    Leave a comment:


  • Thelakerman
    replied
    Originally posted by KleShreen View Post

    The 45 million is the number of flu cases the US generally has each year (between 45 and 60 million confirmed). I was saying if the same number of people get this virus as get the flu, the death numbers would be to a point the economy would not recover from for decades.

    Leave a comment:


  • KleShreen
    replied
    The 45 million is the number of flu cases the US generally has each year (between 45 and 60 million confirmed). I was saying if the same number of people get this virus as get the flu, the death numbers would be to a point the economy would not recover from for decades.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thelakerman
    replied
    Originally posted by KleShreen View Post

    It's not the same at all, though. The "flu or a bad cold" still has a mortality rate of 0.01% and lower. This has a fatality rate of about 3-4% right now, and about 10% for those with pre-existing conditions, which is about half of the United States. 30-40x more deadly for healthy people, 100x more deadly for not-healthy people. And even if you are asymptomatic or get mild symptoms, there is now evidence that it still does permanent damage to your lungs, kidney, and liver, without you noticing, which could impact your life expectancy and/or create issues for you in the future. A "flu or bad cold" has no lasting, permanent effects. Flus and bad colds also have proven, effective treatments. We have no idea how to vaccinate for this virus, we have no idea how to prevent permanent damage from it even in people who have no symptoms, and we don't even have an effective treatment for it like we do for the cold and flu. We don't even create enough antibodies on our own from contracting and "recovering" from this to fight it off in the future. That's why some kind of vaccine is needed, to at least give us more antibodies to effectively fight it. There's always risk for people. But 99% of things you come in contact with at least have effective treatments to minimize the lasting effects of a virus. This does not, which is why it is dumb to take the risk. Until we can make it so the hospitalization rate of people who contract it goes down to what the flu is, about 1% rather than the current 33%, and so that the mortality rate is wayyyy below what it is currently at, every precaution possible should be taken for everybody. The flu kills about 40k people per year. But that's also with about 45 million people per year actually getting the flu. If 45 million people were to get this virus, with the current 3-4% mortality rate, then that's 1.35-1.8 million people dead instead of 40k. That would bring the entire country to its knees in every way imaginable.

    Leave a comment:


  • KleShreen
    replied
    Originally posted by champgymusa View Post

    If schools are not person to person in September football is done...at least for this year...and for many schools with a thin cash flow it might be the death of sports...sad as hell...
    Would it, though, for D2 and D3? I think the opinion of a lot of D2 and D3 schools would be that they would rather just shut down the entire athletic department for a school year and be happy about it. Very, very, very few schools get any kind of profit from athletics. Not playing them for a year would probably save the schools money rather than cost them. The issue of course would be getting student-athletes to stay at the school, or coaches, and getting future recruits if they know that the school will gladly throw them aside in a crisis. So I think there would be a threat to athletics, but I think it would be in the opposite direction - that schools would be glad to save money by not fielding athletic teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • unc4life
    replied
    Originally posted by champgymusa View Post

    If schools are not person to person in September football is done...at least for this year...and for many schools with a thin cash flow it might be the death of sports...sad as hell...
    I wonder about this a lot. I think there are D2 school in the the Midwest that are just holding on, and something like this really hurts. It's deeper too then just the last month and months to come. Its how does it affect enrollment next year, its how many sports will be cut, how many jobs lost. It will be really interesting to see how this all plays out.

    Leave a comment:


  • KleShreen
    replied
    It's not the same at all, though. The "flu or a bad cold" still has a mortality rate of 0.01% and lower. This has a fatality rate of about 3-4% right now, and about 10% for those with pre-existing conditions, which is about half of the United States. 30-40x more deadly for healthy people, 100x more deadly for not-healthy people. And even if you are asymptomatic or get mild symptoms, there is now evidence that it still does permanent damage to your lungs, kidney, and liver, without you noticing, which could impact your life expectancy and/or create issues for you in the future. A "flu or bad cold" has no lasting, permanent effects. Flus and bad colds also have proven, effective treatments. We have no idea how to vaccinate for this virus, we have no idea how to prevent permanent damage from it even in people who have no symptoms, and we don't even have an effective treatment for it like we do for the cold and flu. We don't even create enough antibodies on our own from contracting and "recovering" from this to fight it off in the future. That's why some kind of vaccine is needed, to at least give us more antibodies to effectively fight it. There's always risk for people. But 99% of things you come in contact with at least have effective treatments to minimize the lasting effects of a virus. This does not, which is why it is dumb to take the risk. Until we can make it so the hospitalization rate of people who contract it goes down to what the flu is, about 1% rather than the current 33%, and so that the mortality rate is wayyyy below what it is currently at, every precaution possible should be taken for everybody. The flu kills about 40k people per year. But that's also with about 45 million people per year actually getting the flu. If 45 million people were to get this virus, with the current 3-4% mortality rate, then that's 1.35-1.8 million people dead instead of 40k. That would bring the entire country to its knees in every way imaginable.

    Leave a comment:


  • champgymusa
    replied
    Originally posted by unc4life View Post
    I think the real question will be are schools back on campus in September, If yes then i think there will be football, If not then no there will not be football. It will also be interesting to see how that works out across states. Will there be schools back on campus in Ohio, but not Michigan? What will the GLIAC do if not all the school in the conference are back? We still have a long way to go till August.
    If schools are not person to person in September football is done...at least for this year...and for many schools with a thin cash flow it might be the death of sports...sad as hell...

    Leave a comment:


  • Thelakerman
    replied
    Originally posted by unc4life View Post
    I think the real question will be are schools back on campus in September, If yes then i think there will be football, If not then no there will not be football. It will also be interesting to see how that works out across states. Will there be schools back on campus in Ohio, but not Michigan? What will the GLIAC do if not all the school in the conference are back? We still have a long way to go till August.
    You hit the nail on the head.

    Leave a comment:


  • unc4life
    replied
    I think the real question will be are schools back on campus in September, If yes then i think there will be football, If not then no there will not be football. It will also be interesting to see how that works out across states. Will there be schools back on campus in Ohio, but not Michigan? What will the GLIAC do if not all the school in the conference are back? We still have a long way to go till August.

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X