Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Playoff Criteria?

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Techster88 View Post

    There is no SOS for any Minn School and you have no idea how good they are or arent because you have absolutely nothing to compare them to. Why allow two team withs 3 losses into playoffs from one conference with no statistical data across the region? Absolutely grab bag picks nothing more nothing less.
    What evidence do you have for the other teams???

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

      So we skip the ‘regular’ season and just make a giant bracket? Or eliminate all conferences and just play in Super Regions instead? Then teams can play enough H2H games to matter?

      Hiw can head head to head be the only way???
      Is your goal to win your conference or to make the playoffs and win a National Championship?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

        What evidence do you have for the other teams???
        Thanks you are validating my point.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Techster88 View Post

          Is your goal to win your conference or to make the playoffs and win a National Championship?
          Win the nation championship.

          How the hell does that have anything to do with my question?

          Comment


          • #35
            I don't see what the big issue is. No team from the LSC that didn't make the playoffs has anything to complain about. Angelo at 8-3 had two opportunities to win a singular football game and didn't get it done. They have no complaint (and nobody from ASU or associated with ASU has complained about not making it) WT at 8-3 lost to 3 other LSC teams, two of which made the playoffs. They would be considered "4th" from the conference. Again, nobody really associated with WT is complaining about them not being in the playoffs.

            Tarleton is in and the #2 seed, handle business and it won't matter if they are 2 or 7 seed. Commerce is in at 7 because they got beat by two other playoff teams while winning every other game they could.

            Techster88 who would you remove and who would you add? I don't see a real error in the committee's decision. The ONLY thing you could possibly argue is seeding of 1 & 2, but even that is semantics at best.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Techster88 View Post

              Thanks you are validating my point.
              I’m not. I’m asking you about the topic you think you have the answer to.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by ASURAM2010 View Post
                I don't see what the big issue is. No team from the LSC that didn't make the playoffs has anything to complain about. Angelo at 8-3 had two opportunities to win a singular football game and didn't get it done. They have no complaint (and nobody from ASU or associated with ASU has complained about not making it) WT at 8-3 lost to 3 other LSC teams, two of which made the playoffs. They would be considered "4th" from the conference. Again, nobody really associated with WT is complaining about them not being in the playoffs.

                Tarleton is in and the #2 seed, handle business and it won't matter if they are 2 or 7 seed. Commerce is in at 7 because they got beat by two other playoff teams while winning every other game they could.

                Techster88 who would you remove and who would you add? I don't see a real error in the committee's decision. The ONLY thing you could possibly argue is seeding of 1 & 2, but even that is semantics at best.
                This. This question has been completely ignored. It's just whining to whine at this point.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

                  What evidence do you have for the other teams???
                  Clear evidence in all of the OOC games the RMAC played. I mean, Mines beat Azusa so clearly we know they belong. Commerce lost to the only teams they played that made the playoffs, maybe we should replace them with Winona actually.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Turbonium View Post

                    Clear evidence in all of the OOC games the RMAC played. I mean, Mines beat Azusa so clearly we know they belong. Commerce lost to the only teams they played that made the playoffs, maybe we should replace them with Winona actually.
                    Right? That’s kinda what I’m thinking.

                    Reseed:
                    1) Mines
                    2) MSU
                    3) Pueblo
                    4) Tarleton
                    5) Augustana
                    6) Sioux Falls
                    7) Winona or Dixie

                    :)
                    adding the smiley as to not bunch other’s panties further

                    Comment

                    Ad3

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X