Originally posted by Runnin' Cat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pursue Northeastern State to return to the LSC?
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by UISguy23 View PostThey can be nationally relevant with the right staff, AD etc. Mid Majors can compete with anyone hell Wichita St, SDSU, Liberty, Loyola Chicago do or did a pretty good job besting Powr Programs
Comment
-
Originally posted by UISguy23 View PostThey can be nationally relevant with the right staff, AD etc. Mid Majors can compete with anyone hell Wichita St, SDSU, Liberty, Loyola Chicago do or did a pretty good job besting Powr Programs
Liberty University has an endowment of $2.1 Billion. More than most Big 12 schools. That isn't used for athletics, but is a big indicator of major donor support. SDSU is one of two flagship universities for SD. Aside from FCS football, they are not nationally competitive in ANY sport. Yes, they are competing for FCS football championships, but Joe Sixpack can't tell you the difference between FCS, D2, and D3. It's all the same: Not big time.
Loyola and Wichita State are basketball-only schools. And aside from some blue moon deal, no, they aren't relevant in ANY sports, and neither is Liberty.
Come up with something better.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herb Street View Post
Thanks for making my point. You are referencing the very best situations of smaller programs, and they still aren't relevant.
Liberty University has an endowment of $2.1 Billion. More than most Big 12 schools. That isn't used for athletics, but is a big indicator of major donor support. SDSU is one of two flagship universities for SD. Aside from FCS football, they are not nationally competitive in ANY sport. Yes, they are competing for FCS football championships, but Joe Sixpack can't tell you the difference between FCS, D2, and D3. It's all the same: Not big time.
Loyola and Wichita State are basketball-only schools. And aside from some blue moon deal, no, they aren't relevant in ANY sports, and neither is Liberty.
Come up with something better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Buffalo/Islander Alum View PostJust catching up on the holiday news.
MIAA Approves Northeastern State's Request to Play as an Independent Institution in Football - Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (themiaa.com)
Looks like last month the MIAA and Northeastern State agreed to some sort of probationary status where NSU can play football as an independent for the 2024 and 2025 season.
I know this is adding (returning) another weak team to the conference but it does bolster the membership and is insurance if current LSC members decide to make the D1 plunge and/or Central Washington has to make a negative football move with their LSC membership.
They cant be any worse than Sul Ross and Western New Mexico.
Thoughts?
Comment
-
Originally posted by the tav View Post
Bruh, you're a Buffalo Islander Alum. Meaning! You don't know **** about the in and outs of CWU. CWU isn't going to be drop the football program. They're not going to move up to the FCS. CWU is all in playing Division 2 Football either in the LSC Conference or Independent.
In the original post I said a negative move which could be an example of many things.
Leaving the LSC for any reason would be considered a negative move.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herb Street View Post
Thanks for making my point. You are referencing the very best situations of smaller programs, and they still aren't relevant.
Liberty University has an endowment of $2.1 Billion. More than most Big 12 schools. That isn't used for athletics, but is a big indicator of major donor support. SDSU is one of two flagship universities for SD. Aside from FCS football, they are not nationally competitive in ANY sport. Yes, they are competing for FCS football championships, but Joe Sixpack can't tell you the difference between FCS, D2, and D3. It's all the same: Not big time.
Loyola and Wichita State are basketball-only schools. And aside from some blue moon deal, no, they aren't relevant in ANY sports, and neither is Liberty.
Come up with something better.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View Post
Unfortunately competing for national championships is not the driving factor in the moves to D1. Money, ego, and a higher profile are generally more important to the administrators making these decisions. In Commerce I know that donations are up by a good measure as are advertising revenues. Scholarship money has gone from $2.4 mil/ year to $4.3 mil/year currently. Women’s and men’s basketball (to a lesser degree) are both already competitive in conference. Money games at Kentucky, A&M, Texas Tech among others and adding to the cash pile and a spot in March madness a few years down the road will be far more beneficial than winning a D2 natty will ever be.
That entire charade, just to score a spot in the tournament of 66 teams once in a generation, is pretty silly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herb Street View Post
There’s no accumulating “cash pile” at Commerce. That whole conference is D1 in name only. If it feeds someone’s ego to get blown out by the 3-deeps at Kyle Field, oh well.
That entire charade, just to score a spot in the tournament of 66 teams once in a generation, is pretty silly.Last edited by JakeTAMUC; 12-27-2023, 10:58 PM.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View Post
The football games against San Diego State and Florida State in the next 2 years will also feed a little over $1 million into the coffers to provide more money for more students. The 3 basketball games I referenced from this year netted Commerce right around $300,000. But, I’m sure, being “relevant” in D2 is much more important.
So $1 million from San Diego State and Florida State is going to...students?
Dude.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herb Street View Post
So $1 million from San Diego State and Florida State is going to...students?
Dude.Last edited by JakeTAMUC; 12-28-2023, 10:27 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View Post
I know you mostly just come here to troll but I’ll play along for another few minutes. Athletic budgets cover scholarships, food, housing, training, academic tutoring, coaching, etc. A handful of games this year covered about 10% of those expenses and afforded the athletes the experience of playing at places like Rupp arena and College Station. If you want to tell anyone that this doesn’t benefit the students then show me receipts and evidence, otherwise you are just blowing smoke out your ass.
So if $1 million is 10 percent of the expenses, does that mean Commerce's athletic budget to be D1 is $10 million?
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment