Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WT's Athletic Director Taking Position at Stephen F. Austin

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Techster88 View Post

    I agree with your thought process. What you are missing is that Amarillo residents have little to no interest in watching WT Football in the current format. Sometimes, when things aren't working and apparently things aren't working that well at the present, you need to try a different combination.

    Locals that want the football you are talking about will drive to Lubbock. As bad as Tech and Nebraska have been for quite a while they still seem to get fan support. But, most won't make that journey. There is an opportunity for WT to fill a void but someone will have to step up.

    I do believe it would generate more excitement than winning the LSC going two rounds in the playoffs. WT current situation is like stale bread so to speak.

    In college athletics today its either stagnation or growth. Pick your poison.
    This is getting pretty weird.
    1. "Amarillo residents" aren't going to have any more interest in Northeastern Louisiana than Angelo State.
    2. WT athletics isn't stale or stagnant. They have support that most schools can only dream about, some of the best facilities in Division 2, and are atop the rankings in almost every sport.
    Maybe you missed the electric South Central Regional Men's basketball championship, or the jam-packed Fieldhouse for the South Central Volleyball tournament, or any number of the very competitive softball and baseball games.

    You need to go to Canyon and check the teams out sometime instead of pining about yesteryear and visions of grandeur. It ain't happening.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Herb Street View Post

      The investors would need to be thousands of Joe Sixpack supporters who are buying season tickets every year. I don't see any white knight company spending $ millions a year for WT to ball. For FCS and low D1 to even be viable, you need to have a budget of $16-18 million. Outside money needs to pay half of that, and consistently do so. The problem is, you can't budget for Joe Sixpack, because when he gets mad because you fired his coach, he quits giving. WT has more former supporters than active supporters, because their panties got in a wad a generation ago (or two, or three) and their $1000 annual check is conditional.

      Real D1 programs have solid support regardless. Nebraska has been wandering in the desert for almost 20 years now, yet the faithful keep packing the stadium and giving the money. That's what it takes. I don't think WT has enough fans with balls enough to support the program through thick and thin.
      $200 semester increased student fee brings in close to $4,000,000. Current budget is $11,300,000. That puts it up at $15,000,000. I think outside giving could make up another $2M-$3M a year. It's probably doable for the Southland.

      Would school grow (Wendler finally gone)? Growth to 11,000 would brings in additional $1M. Would attendance for FB, BB, WBB, SB, and VB grow?

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by MooseLodge View Post

        This is getting pretty weird.
        1. "Amarillo residents" aren't going to have any more interest in Northeastern Louisiana than Angelo State.
        2. WT athletics isn't stale or stagnant. They have support that most schools can only dream about, some of the best facilities in Division 2, and are atop the rankings in almost every sport.
        Maybe you missed the electric South Central Regional Men's basketball championship, or the jam-packed Fieldhouse for the South Central Volleyball tournament, or any number of the very competitive softball and baseball games.

        You need to go to Canyon and check the teams out sometime instead of pining about yesteryear and visions of grandeur. It ain't happening.
        I didn’t say anything about Northeastern La or the Southland Conference. I would stay put if that was the option. I said the UAC where there are schools like ACU, Tarleton and Central Arkansas etc.

        if all you want is Canyon locals by all means stay D2. I was talking about reaching a larger fan base and Amarillo provides that.

        Geez, talk about tunnel vision.

        Filling a gym is NOT filling a Football Stadium

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by BuffaloChip View Post

          $200 semester increased student fee brings in close to $4,000,000. Current budget is $11,300,000. That puts it up at $15,000,000. I think outside giving could make up another $2M-$3M a year. It's probably doable for the Southland.

          Would school grow (Wendler finally gone)? Growth to 11,000 would brings in additional $1M. Would attendance for FB, BB, WBB, SB, and VB grow?
          I used to think attendance would grow. But I've surfed some ESPN Plus and have glanced in on a few of these Southland games. Attendance is horrendous. The MAC teams are all D1 FBS, and their attendance is embarrassing. Granted these are weekday night games but they are on national TV with practically no one in the stadium.

          A poster mentioned Central Arkansas. I live close to there and no one goes to those games.

          I guess it's possible that a president comes along one day at WT that thinks it's a grand idea. I just don't think they've got legit booster support. Most of what I hear is "I used to give them $200 a year but then they fired ______________ (fill in blank with coach's name)." Boy you show'd 'em who's boss!

          To play big boy ball, you've got to have sustained, unwavering, big boy donors, and a lot of them. Most of WT's support is sofa change and highly conditional. Although in the Division 2 world, WT is king daddy.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Herb Street View Post

            I used to think attendance would grow. But I've surfed some ESPN Plus and have glanced in on a few of these Southland games. Attendance is horrendous. The MAC teams are all D1 FBS, and their attendance is embarrassing. Granted these are weekday night games but they are on national TV with practically no one in the stadium.

            A poster mentioned Central Arkansas. I live close to there and no one goes to those games.

            I guess it's possible that a president comes along one day at WT that thinks it's a grand idea. I just don't think they've got legit booster support. Most of what I hear is "I used to give them $200 a year but then they fired ______________ (fill in blank with coach's name)." Boy you show'd 'em who's boss!

            To play big boy ball, you've got to have sustained, unwavering, big boy donors, and a lot of them. Most of WT's support is sofa change and highly conditional. Although in the Division 2 world, WT is king daddy.
            Your guess would be wrong. Central Arkansas has over 8500 attendance for their home games. Their stadium is near capacity.

            WT does well to scratch out 6500 fans which is decent for D2 considering some of the away do well to muster 2000 fans.

            if this this is WT ‘s ceiling stay put.

            if being King Daddy of Scrub Ball is where you want to be that’s fine by me. I’ll only get 10 hours of good sleep at night worrying about it.

            my thinking is Universities want to be with their peer group.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by BuffaloChip View Post

              $200 semester increased student fee brings in close to $4,000,000. Current budget is $11,300,000. That puts it up at $15,000,000. I think outside giving could make up another $2M-$3M a year. It's probably doable for the Southland.

              Would school grow (Wendler finally gone)? Growth to 11,000 would brings in additional $1M. Would attendance for FB, BB, WBB, SB, and VB grow?
              Seems to me that WT was well on their way to go easily past 11,000+ students in the early 2010's until the Carthel Fire, Wendler Hire, and then COVID.

              I would think sustaining winning in the Southland would go hand and hand with attendance numbers.

              If Volleyball and Basketball can mostly fill the gym for D2 games, hard to believe that wouldnt be the case if the same success is happening in the Southland.

              I remember about 10 years ago when Florida Gulf Coast made their sweet 16 run, their enrollment numbers went through the roof.

              It wont be easy but definitely can be done.

              The challenge will be when Wendler leaves and how much time passes before people forget when WT football was relevant and if the new AD shares his vision of not giving a $hit about sports.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Buffalo/Islander Alum View Post

                Seems to me that WT was well on their way to go easily past 11,000+ students in the early 2010's until the Carthel Fire, Wendler Hire, and then COVID.

                I would think sustaining winning in the Southland would go hand and hand with attendance numbers.

                If Volleyball and Basketball can mostly fill the gym for D2 games, hard to believe that wouldnt be the case if the same success is happening in the Southland.

                I remember about 10 years ago when Florida Gulf Coast made their sweet 16 run, their enrollment numbers went through the roof.

                It wont be easy but definitely can be done.

                The challenge will be when Wendler leaves and how much time passes before people forget when WT football was relevant and if the new AD shares his vision of not giving a $hit about sports.
                Had O'Brien stayed 5 more years, I believe WT enrollment would now be at least 12,000. His goal was 15,000.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Buffalo/Islander Alum View Post

                  Seems to me that WT was well on their way to go easily past 11,000+ students in the early 2010's until the Carthel Fire, Wendler Hire, and then COVID.

                  I would think sustaining winning in the Southland would go hand and hand with attendance numbers.

                  If Volleyball and Basketball can mostly fill the gym for D2 games, hard to believe that wouldnt be the case if the same success is happening in the Southland.

                  I remember about 10 years ago when Florida Gulf Coast made their sweet 16 run, their enrollment numbers went through the roof.

                  It wont be easy but definitely can be done.

                  The challenge will be when Wendler leaves and how much time passes before people forget when WT football was relevant and if the new AD shares his vision of not giving a $hit about sports.
                  Yes. growth was good until Wendler. I am a Carthel fan but I don't think enrollment dropped due to him being fired. Attendance at the games definitely did as most do not want to watch lame football even if it's played in a new high school stadium. It may be the best stadium in D2 but remember the D2 championship game is played in a much nicer high school stadium. I would love to think Coach Lynn is going to be great, but last year's team looked like they didn't practice more than once a week.

                  I remember Wendler saying early on that there were "too many students on campus". I wonder if any other college president has said that in history? Of course later he would brag about telling students to go somewhere else if it saved them money. Sharp lauded this thinking. I wonder if Sharp also liked the faculty's vote of no confidence in Wendler?

                  So I think Wendler, who no longer publicizes the enrollment numbers, is just a symptom that WT is not on the good side of A&M. Obviously Tarleton and to some extent Commerce are. Maybe we could beg UT to take us...

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Techster88 View Post

                    Your guess would be wrong. Central Arkansas has over 8500 attendance for their home games. Their stadium is near capacity.

                    WT does well to scratch out 6500 fans which is decent for D2 considering some of the away do well to muster 2000 fans.

                    if this this is WT ‘s ceiling stay put.

                    if being King Daddy of Scrub Ball is where you want to be that’s fine by me. I’ll only get 10 hours of good sleep at night worrying about it.

                    my thinking is Universities want to be with their peer group.
                    I checked Central Arkansas' attendance and it is very good, even against Texas College, who they played a week after making a decent showing against OK State.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by WT_TKW View Post

                      Yes. growth was good until Wendler. I am a Carthel fan but I don't think enrollment dropped due to him being fired. Attendance at the games definitely did as most do not want to watch lame football even if it's played in a new high school stadium. It may be the best stadium in D2 but remember the D2 championship game is played in a much nicer high school stadium. I would love to think Coach Lynn is going to be great, but last year's team looked like they didn't practice more than once a week.

                      I remember Wendler saying early on that there were "too many students on campus". I wonder if any other college president has said that in history? Of course later he would brag about telling students to go somewhere else if it saved them money. Sharp lauded this thinking. I wonder if Sharp also liked the faculty's vote of no confidence in Wendler?

                      So I think Wendler, who no longer publicizes the enrollment numbers, is just a symptom that WT is not on the good side of A&M. Obviously Tarleton and to some extent Commerce are. Maybe we could beg UT to take us...
                      Join the UT system drop the A&M and become West Texas University.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by WT_TKW View Post
                        When did he arrive? Maybe it's simply a reflection of the overall decline in college enrollment?

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Brandon View Post

                          When did he arrive? Maybe it's simply a reflection of the overall decline in college enrollment?
                          Wendler? In 2016. The man is on record telling underclassmen to consider junior college before coming to WT.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Brandon View Post

                            When did he arrive? Maybe it's simply a reflection of the overall decline in college enrollment?
                            WT enrollment was 10,008 and stayed flat since Wendler took over then took a nose dive when he started telling potential students to save money and go to community colleges instead.Now enrollment is around 8500.The lowest it was at 8200.A lot of athletic problems are coming from this problem he has caused.About nearly 1500 students lost in athletic fees that could be helping athletics.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by WT_TKW View Post

                              Yes. growth was good until Wendler. I am a Carthel fan but I don't think enrollment dropped due to him being fired. Attendance at the games definitely did as most do not want to watch lame football even if it's played in a new high school stadium. It may be the best stadium in D2 but remember the D2 championship game is played in a much nicer high school stadium. I would love to think Coach Lynn is going to be great, but last year's team looked like they didn't practice more than once a week.

                              I remember Wendler saying early on that there were "too many students on campus". I wonder if any other college president has said that in history? Of course later he would brag about telling students to go somewhere else if it saved them money. Sharp lauded this thinking. I wonder if Sharp also liked the faculty's vote of no confidence in Wendler?

                              So I think Wendler, who no longer publicizes the enrollment numbers, is just a symptom that WT is not on the good side of A&M. Obviously Tarleton and to some extent Commerce are. Maybe we could beg UT to take us...
                              His pay should be tied to enrollment. I’d bet this would change his mind about jr college. Retraction would hit him in the pocket book.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by WT&TTECHfan View Post
                                WT enrollment was 10,008 and stayed flat since Wendler took over then took a nose dive when he started telling potential students to save money and go to community colleges instead.Now enrollment is around 8500.The lowest it was at 8200.A lot of athletic problems are coming from this problem he has caused.About nearly 1500 students lost in athletic fees that could be helping athletics.
                                Couple of other nuggets that are hurting WT:

                                1. Texas Tech is developing a robust RN program that is in direct competition to WT.
                                2. Wendler went to a 4-day school week, which turned it into a suitcase college almost overnight. Really bad move there.

                                There are other, external factors that are not on Wendler, but to give up 15 percent in enrollment on your watch is sobering. The one thing I can say about the guy is that he can fundraise. The Capital Campaign is nearing $200 million the last I checked. I have no idea how anyone can verify that, nor how it is calculated, but it sounds good on paper.

                                What really needs to happen is the raising of a $100 million athletic endowment that would continue to fund topflight teams and take some pressure off of the university budget. That would generate $5 million a year in permanent revenue. I think that could be raised over a 5-year period if all hands were on deck.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X