Alternative playoff seeding plans

[NGUCrusader]

Re: Alternative playoff seeding plans

one factor in your region is that you are the only fully funded conference which of course means you have the best teams in the region...also factor in how many fewer teams your region has had recently...then factor in how the other conferences in your region play out of conference games so those weaker teams in weaker conferences take losses before their conference play begins which means at the end of the season you generally end up with maybe one team from each of those other conferences with 2 or less loses...all of that allows for 4+ gsc teams to get in every year

NGU isn't fully funded. I'm not sure of the exact number this year, but we have somewhere around 25 scholarships.

[Ram040506]

Re: Alternative playoff seeding plans

Certainly then, but I recall these threads when Shepherd and Winston-Salem made the NC game. Of course, GV didn't make the playoffs those years so your premise might be correct! This thread is sometimes disguised as "The REAL NC game was the SRX Championship game" or "The semifinal game was the REAL NC game."

Shepherd beat GV in the semifinal that year.

[boatcapt]

Re: Alternative playoff seeding plans

Shepherd beat GV in the semifinal that year.

The poster said "Don't Deserve" threads only came up when GV was not in the NC game. By losing to Shepherd in the semis, they were not in the NC game.