Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How can we encourage more OOC games

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
    One of the challenges is the size of the conferences. The larger conferences typically only allow for one open week - and that open week doesn't always line up with others.
    I'm not buying it. Any conference that has a rotating off week is not related to OOC issues. That happens with an odd number of schools in the conference which is when it would have trouble lining up with other available teams. Large or small, that is a conference fail if it happens.

    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
    Then of course you have some conferences (who shall remain anonymous) scheduling a full 11-week conference schedule without any opportunity for OOC games.
    No pulling punches. The MIAA started this crap for the conferences in the Midwest and are responsible for the mess they made. No excuses and it has been a very vocal part of objection by the fans of the teams since it was even rumored. Needs to be corrected.

    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
    Another challenge is cost. A lot of D2 schools are regional state schools who have decreasing budgets. That means less money to take 75 people on an overnight trip. Very few D2 schools produce enough revenue to give a guarantee. This is especially an issue in regions where schools insist on noon kickoffs. If you're six hours apart you're not leaving a 4am for a noon kickoff.
    Again, not buying it. Just in the MIAA for example Kearney/UCO/NSU were added stretching the boundaries north and south. Hays (although getting dated at this point) and Lindenwood were added stretching the footprint east and west. Any of those could have been used as OOC for schools for when they were closer but still allowing options for those schools now being forced to travel farther.

    Here are some rough average distances travelled for NW over the years using city to city distance of regular season opponents:
    2000/2001 - 2332 miles total, 12 games - avg 194 miles per non home game (Mankato and UNO on schedule as OOC)
    2008/2009 - 2433 miles total, 12 games - avg 203 miles per non home game (ACU)
    2017/2018 - 2626 miles total, 12 games - avg 218 miles per non home game(none)

    The silo scheduling has resulted in roughly 15-25 miles more travel per game than was needed in the past. It has INCREASED the travel time, distance and costs. The only thing it has helped is making peoples jobs lazy in scheduling.

    This includes going to Abilene, TX for an out of conference matchup in 2009 (~700 miles).
    Mankato is actually even closer than any of Hays, Lindenwood, UCO or NSU as well for early 2000s vs today. (Various routes can interchange distances with Hays and Lindenwood as they are about a half hour time closer, although ~10 miles farther, from Maryville)

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

      Here is the latest D2 regional map

      https://ncaad2rules.blogspot.com/2018/10/201819-ncaa-d2-regional-opponent-map.html?m=1
      Last edited by WVIAC-F-EVER; 10-24-2018, 01:59 PM. Reason: Adding link

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

        Originally posted by WVIAC-F-EVER View Post
        https://ncaad2rules.blogspot.com/201...t-map.html?m=1 clickable for you now. It should be noted that GNAC is in the 3 coastal states and BC with no OOC games in neighboring states possible for any of its member teams. In non-football sports, that is a different story as it has schools in Idaho and Montana (as well as Alaska, which neighbors BC now with a conference foe). As of next year, the entire pink part of the map will have just 4 football schools.

        I hear everyone talking about travel, but that trip from LA to Vancouver, BC in conference won't be a day trip either. That is the state of things in the West sadly.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

          Originally posted by WVIAC-F-EVER View Post
          Is there a map that shows only the 4 Super Regions for football.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

            Originally posted by zimmy21 View Post
            Never going to happen but put a cap on amount of schools in a conference? It would lead to scheduling alliances that amount to the same as OOC games but would essentially create a system like the NSIC uses
            Ten is the perfect size. Allows you to play everyone in the conference every year and two non-conference games- one home, one away.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

              Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
              It lasted longer that the regional ranking transparency that the NCAA said they were going to engage in. That lasted less than one year ending the week before the actual playoff selections were made.
              They still publish the criteria used and the data for each criteria for every team in each region.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                Originally posted by laker View Post
                Ten is the perfect size. Allows you to play everyone in the conference every year and two non-conference games- one home, one away.
                This. When the MIAA had 10 teams, it was awesome.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                  Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
                  A conference that is siloed basically takes the SOS variable out of the equation by insuring every one of its member schools have a .500.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                    http://https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TRZL7S2aK2VY-90GXCNp0afizV8gM4YW/view?usp=drivesdk
                    Last edited by twolfbenchwarmer; 10-24-2018, 07:22 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                      Missing British Columbia! Our SR is so spread out compared to the other 3 so travel is a huge issue.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                        Originally posted by Wildcat Khan View Post
                        Missing British Columbia! Our SR is so spread out compared to the other 3 so travel is a huge issue.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                          Odd numbered teams wouldn't be an issue if the ncaa would let everyone start a week earlier and have a bye week later in the year.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                            Originally posted by Ian Carlson View Post
                            They still publish the criteria used and the data for each criteria for every team in each region.
                            Last I checked, they publish the data for each week of Regional Rankings except the last week which would be the week the selections are made.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                              Originally posted by NewCatEyez View Post
                              I'm not buying it. Any conference that has a rotating off week is not related to OOC issues. That happens with an odd number of schools in the conference which is when it would have trouble lining up with other available teams. Large or small, that is a conference fail if it happens.



                              No pulling punches. The MIAA started this crap for the conferences in the Midwest and are responsible for the mess they made. No excuses and it has been a very vocal part of objection by the fans of the teams since it was even rumored. Needs to be corrected.



                              Again, not buying it. Just in the MIAA for example Kearney/UCO/NSU were added stretching the boundaries north and south. Hays (although getting dated at this point) and Lindenwood were added stretching the footprint east and west. Any of those could have been used as OOC for schools for when they were closer but still allowing options for those schools now being forced to travel farther.

                              Here are some rough average distances travelled for NW over the years using city to city distance of regular season opponents:
                              2000/2001 - 2332 miles total, 12 games - avg 194 miles per non home game (Mankato and UNO on schedule as OOC)
                              2008/2009 - 2433 miles total, 12 games - avg 203 miles per non home game (ACU)
                              2017/2018 - 2626 miles total, 12 games - avg 218 miles per non home game(none)

                              The silo scheduling has resulted in roughly 15-25 miles more travel per game than was needed in the past. It has INCREASED the travel time, distance and costs. The only thing it has helped is making peoples jobs lazy in scheduling.

                              This includes going to Abilene, TX for an out of conference matchup in 2009 (~700 miles).
                              Mankato is actually even closer than any of Hays, Lindenwood, UCO or NSU as well for early 2000s vs today. (Various routes can interchange distances with Hays and Lindenwood as they are about a half hour time closer, although ~10 miles farther, from Maryville)
                              You might have some rosy lenses being a Northwest fan. In the PSAC athletic budgets are dropping precipitously because by and large athletics are funded through student fees. Enrollment is down 20% across the board since 2010 so that's a big chunk gone. Fortunately the PSAC only has one week for OOC games - and its always the same week (week one). IUP doesn't have the budget that Northwest has to play national OOC games. I've been told by coaches that sometimes its between playing an OOC/11th game or buying needed equipment.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: How can we encourage more OOC games

                                Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
                                You might have some rosy lenses being a Northwest fan. In the PSAC athletic budgets are dropping precipitously because by and large athletics are funded through student fees. Enrollment is down 20% across the board since 2010 so that's a big chunk gone. Fortunately the PSAC only has one week for OOC games - and its always the same week (week one). IUP doesn't have the budget that Northwest has to play national OOC games. I've been told by coaches that sometimes its between playing an OOC/11th game or buying needed equipment.
                                That post was definitely not with NW colored glasses on and if it came across that way it wasn't intended. The MIAA has hosed basically the entirety of SR3 and SR4 from close OOC and thus forced more into silo scheduling. NW is included in that blame. Their public face was helping cut costs when about 20 minutes of research showed that expenses and travel times have increased with the silo scheduling in football. They are doing the exact opposite of what they say they are doing and simply making the scheduling a lazy non factor.

                                The RMAC, LSC, GAC, GLVC and NSIC are all being punished for the MIAA removing themselves from OOC potential matchups. I'm definitely not going to waste the time on running through all MIAA team schedules but Pitt, Emporia and Southern are the only three I can think that likely had travel costs lowered and that is likely more from teams like Truman leaving (as their travel would have exploded). While we all joke about Lindenwood tucking tail and running from the MIAA the travel comparisons for them aren't even close when looking at the GLVC vs MIAA. Hays, UCO and Kearney are all ~500 miles, Indianapolis is 300 miles.

                                Any conference in the northeast is within short drives of many other conferences and shouldn't be an issue at all. The GNAC is so isolated out west there isn't a solution for them without 3 or 4 more teams jumping in on football and lowering all of their travel costs together.

                                Quick scan at the D2 map and there are just over 20 teams CLOSER to Edinboro for OOC matchups than two conference matchups... Silo scheduling is lazy, not cost savings.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X