Originally posted by Ship69
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bloom
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bart View PostAnother OT loss. Tough way to lose the lead on third and three from the Bloomsburg 19 with about 6 minutes to go in the game , Edinboro interception to the Bloom 3. In OT two pass interference calls takes Ediinboro to the 3 yard line. 11 turnovers between the 2 teams; it must have been an ugly game to watch.
Leave a comment:
-
Another OT loss. Tough way to lose the lead on third and three from the Bloomsburg 19 with about 6 minutes to go in the game , Edinboro interception to the Bloom 3. In OT two pass interference calls takes Ediinboro to the 3 yard line. 11 turnovers between the 2 teams; it must have been an ugly game to watch.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RocknTheSnackBar View Post
Is his nickname the LePoidevin Throw Way?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bart View PostBloomsburg looks to start 18 freshmen or sophomores and have 38 underclassmen total listed on the depth chart.
Backup is So. LePoidevin.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sidearm.sit...s_-_Week_1.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bart View PostBloom has some skill people, but not much on the OL and DL. Passing game showed today with 284 yards on 14 for 16. Some nice fakes with the run, and QB rolling out to find wr. Running game with 214 for 497 total offense.
Clarion has a good run game. I think their punter hit one for over 90 yards with the wind.
Stonehill won 76-0, after winning in double OT last week.
Beating Clarion soundly is a second straight week with an encouraging result.
Leave a comment:
-
Bloom has some skill people, but not much on the OL and DL. Passing game showed today with 284 yards on 14 for 16. Some nice fakes with the run, and QB rolling out to find wr. Running game with 214 for 497 total offense.
Clarion has a good run game. I think their punter hit one for over 90 yards with the wind.
Stonehill won 76-0, after winning in double OT last week.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
I agree with all these posts. The problem in evaluating Bloom based on that game is that we don't know how good Stonehill is. I expected them to make some upgrades to move up in division. However, they could still be the same Stonehill as last year in D2.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CHIP72 View PostBloomsburg's goal this season after the last few down years should be to finish around .500. A solid effort against a Stonehill team that moved up to DI-AA/FCS this year and easily beat the Huskies last season is an encouraging start, even if losing in overtime after leading late in regulation is a disappointing outcome in the context of the game.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CHIP72 View PostBloomsburg's goal this season after the last few down years should be to finish around .500. A solid effort against a Stonehill team that moved up to DI-AA/FCS this year and easily beat the Huskies last season is an encouraging start, even if losing in overtime after leading late in regulation is a disappointing outcome in the context of the game.
Leave a comment:
-
Bloomsburg's goal this season after the last few down years should be to finish around .500. A solid effort against a Stonehill team that moved up to DI-AA/FCS this year and easily beat the Huskies last season is an encouraging start, even if losing in overtime after leading late in regulation is a disappointing outcome in the context of the game.
Leave a comment:
-
I feel the young Frosh Qb making his 1st start showed a lot of guts and played hard. He made mistakes, but a ton of potential! Extremel young team, some key losses in off season, some to transfer some to injuries. Don''t think they go to playoffs or win division, but look much better.
Leave a comment:
-
I wasn't expecting a Bloom victory, but the game was more competitive than expected. Maybe the Huskies can improve on last year's 3-8.
Leave a comment:
-
I didn’t get a chance to watch/follow the game due to work and another commitment but looking through the box score/play by play I have a few observations:- It’s a bad sign when you’re +3 in turnover margin and still can’t win. I’m a bit worried about how this team will look in a turnover neutral game.
- Bloomsburg had three 4th and 1s and one 4th and 2 and opted to kick on all of them. I can understand punting on 4th and 1 from your own 37 late in the 4th and somewhat understand kicking a FG in 2OT (although I would have preferred going for it) but the other two punt decisions felt excessively conservative for a team that wants running to be their identity. Perhaps Sheptock is a Tresselball disciple.
- Speaking of punting that final punt was about the worst possible time for a shank. If the punter had done as well as his previous two-three punts Bloom might have pinned Stonehill deep enough to keep things from going to OT in the first place. Very unclutch.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bart View PostQB play was okay with the running game as they gained 180 yards, after last year's average of 118 per game. The game plan was obviously to run the ball, but 56 carries for 3.2 yards per carry isn't very exciting. Only 13 passing attempts with 7 completions for 48 yards. The plan must have been to stay away from the pass rush and secondary, as Bloom is inexperienced on the OL.
Stonehill looked like the better team, especially with personnel. Bloom got some lucky bounces with turnovers, and had an 11 point lead with about 6 minutes to go in the game. Penalties hurt, but the blocking below the waist in OT, put a stop to ultimately winning the game with a short fg in OT. Coulda, woulda, shoulda. Overall a better outing against a D1Stonehill than against a D2 Stonehill last year.
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: