Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Proposed MO higher education budget. Does it kill the miaa?

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Proposed MO higher education budget. Does it kill the miaa?

    The proposed MO budget plans to alot higher education funding by enrollment. Meaning Mizzou and MoState get most of the money.

    UCM should be ok.

    Do the smaller state schools survive, or do the bigger schools form umbrella systems?

  • #2
    It would increase funding for NW. Currently, NW is the lowest funded institution on a per student basis.

    Comment


    • #3
      Why is NW the lowest funded? I would have guessed Truman State?

      Comment


      • #4
        Anyone know how funds are distributed now? I would have assumed enrollment had already been a major determining factor on how subsidies are paid out. I guess I would have been wrong.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BearCatAlum View Post
          Why is NW the lowest funded? I would have guessed Truman State?
          Truman St is the highest funded on a per student basis. See page 9 of the link. NW is least funded on a per student basis and is best at ROI for degrees granted per state appropriations (page 10).

          https://dhewd.mo.gov/media/pdf/highe...-factbook-2026

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by KPKCBC View Post
            Anyone know how funds are distributed now? I would have assumed enrollment had already been a major determining factor on how subsidies are paid out. I guess I would have been wrong.
            Some archaic formula that has nothing to do with enrollment but was decided on how connected your legislators were with other legislators in the 50s, 60s, 70s.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Predatory Primates View Post
              The proposed MO budget plans to alot higher education funding by enrollment. Meaning Mizzou and MoState get most of the money.

              UCM should be ok.

              Do the smaller state schools survive, or do the bigger schools form umbrella systems?
              UCM is not okay. They are taking head count as of fall 2025 if I am correct. NW, Mo State and MU all saw increases and thus their funding will go up. Others will go down and due to the old funding methodology, UCM would take a substantial cut. Rumors are that it would be upwards of 10% if not more. Harris Stowe was around 40%. Not good at all.

              However, at the board meeting yesterday, athletics had multiple projects approved for a substantial amount of money. Fixing the bleachers in the Hughes Center (aka the Multi) along with a new basketball court; new scoreboard for Walton Stadium; turfing the remainder of Jennies softball field and turfing Jennies Soccer at South Rec. This is surprising as they put in new a Bermuda grass field, with new drainage about five years ago. Go figure.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by NWHoops View Post

                Some archaic formula that has nothing to do with enrollment but was decided on how connected your legislators were with other legislators in the 50s, 60s, 70s.
                Yeah, there’s no formula, just politics. Jay Nixon got upset at a couple of institutions a few years ago and cut their budgets, and those cuts were never restored in all the years since.

                As dumb as the current system may be, distributing state funding strictly on enrollment at a single point of time is even dumber. Truman will lose more than half its appropriation, Harris-Stowe and Lincoln 40%, and basically everybody but NW, Mizzou and Missouri State would see significant reductions. Those funding losses overnight would be devastating.

                Comment

                Ad3

                Collapse
                Working...
                X