Originally posted by Stea1th
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
G-MAC All-Sports and Conference Business Thread
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
-
They started Marching Band the same year they started Football (2009). Compared to some HSs, 50 looks very small. Did not realize that it was a good size D2 band.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Stea1th View PostAn extremely high percentage of NDCs full-time, non-commuter students play sports.
Last I checked, NDC had over 500 student athletes, 50+ in the marching band (I know that's a small band, there is certainly room for growth), and probably about 50 cheerleaders (when you count football and basketball plus dance team). That means that probably 650 or more students are directly or indirectly related to NDC sports offerings.
Leave a comment:
-
An extremely high percentage of NDCs full-time, non-commuter students play sports.
Last I checked, NDC had over 500 student athletes, 50+ in the marching band (I know that's a small band, there is certainly room for growth), and probably about 50 cheerleaders (when you count football and basketball plus dance team). That means that probably 650 or more students are directly or indirectly related to NDC sports offerings.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Uindy18 View Post
Exactly right, schools like Lake Erie would not have the enrollment to survive on their own most likely without sports bringing in more students who paying partial or full tuition.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlueBlood View Post
The G-MAC schools (and most privates for that matter) want to offer as many sports as possible - wrestling, both men's and women's lacrosse, swimming/diving, equestrian, bowling, etc. Sports is a huge enrollment driver. A healthy athletic department can have 500 to 800 student athletes, or more.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, I agree that KSU to the MEAC seems crazy given enrollment and finances. But the article said they are at least exploring it.
As to Central State - I don't really know how burnt the bridge is. It may have just been a mutual parting of the ways based on different goals. The G-MAC had basic core sports that it required and CSU did not want to play those sports. I don't know if the G-MAC was angry about it, or just like...."its obvious to both of us this isn't a fit".
CSU's current sports model is completely opposite the G-MAC schools' model.
CSU intentionally has very limited sports offerings. They concentrate their resources into allowing their football and basketball teams to travel into the deep south to play other HBCUs. All other sports at CSU are the "meet" type where you just show up for the conference championship. Volleyball is kind of a hybrid - the SIAC has 3 big meets a year that allow both CSU and KSU to get all their conference games in.
The G-MAC schools (and most privates for that matter) want to offer as many sports as possible - wrestling, both men's and women's lacrosse, swimming/diving, equestrian, bowling, etc. Sports is a huge enrollment driver. A healthy athletic department can have 500 to 800 student athletes, or more.
Leave a comment:
-
I cannot imagine Ky State jumping to D1, that would be ridiculous.
Leave a comment:
-
Given KSU's financial situation - and the state's - I would be shocked if they did.
Leave a comment:
-
That certainly adds an interesting move. I doubt very strongly Central State would be invited back to the GMAC (the exit is very dramatic and messy, with the sheer number of NCAA and conference rules simply ignored). They are also a former GLVC member, maybe the MEC offers them to pair with NDC? Honestly, I think they would end up staying just because the HBCU thing.
Leave a comment:
-
They've got another rant going on over on the GLIAC board - about how the now-G-MAC schools were simply afraid to compete in the GLIAC and how they fled to an inferior conference.
I've mentioned before that many of the schools that left the GLIAC to join the G-MAC were actually much more competitive than most folks are willing to admit. Below are the GLIAC All-Sports standings the year before the big exodus. The now-G-MAC schools actually held 4 of the top 6 spots in the GLIAC All-Sports rankings. And mores specifically, they held 4 of the 5 spots behind GV.
Put another way - the GLIAC lost 4 of the 5 schools that lined up behind GV - including the only school that consistently nipped at GV's heels. The void between GV and the rest of the GLIAC just widened significantly - and while many don't seem willing to admit that, I think its starting to sink in.
Conversely, it feels like the G-MAC All-Sports standings should be much more competitive among the top 5 or so schools..
I am extremely convinced that good (and competitive) times are ahead for the G-MAC.
2016-17 Presidents' Trophy (All-Sports)
1. Grand Valley State ..218.5
2. Ashland...................153.0
3. Saginaw Valley .......148.0
4. Findlay .................... 144.5
5. Tiffin ....................... 143.5
6. Hillsdale..................131.0
7. Wayne State ............ 125.5
8. Ferris State .............. 124.0
9. Northwood ..............105.0
10. Walsh ........................ 96.0
11. Northern Michigan....93.0
12. Michigan Tech ..........86.0
13. Ohio Dominican .......74.5
14. Lake Erie...................67.0
15. Lake Superior State... 40.5
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by boatcapt View PostI agree to a degree. MEC is not going to invite teams from way outside their foot print. But that said, their foot print is a 5 to 6 state area. I could see the MEC moving into KY but only with a "pod" of teams. Dont see them bring in an individual team. But I get the feeling that the MEC is happy being the size it is. One niggling issue is UNCP. I think they would like a full member who plays football. There are several options but as they say, it takes 2 to tango. Not saying any plans are in the works but some candidates could be Gannon, Seton Hill, UPike, and Bluefield State.
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: