Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transfer Portal's Direction

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Eagle74 View Post

    You're 100% correct. Both schools were NIL heavely financially supported by billionaires including John Ruiz - Miami, and Mark Cuban - Indiana. So indirectly, a lot of talented players were bought and paid for to be included into the stables of the billionaire's preferred teams.

    This is a trend which unchallenged will continue to grow as billionaires are competitive just like everyone else. Maybe in the future the team's names will also include the $$$$ NIL master's names as part of the headline marketing.
    That's how it's always worked. SEC teams did it all the time. Now the playing field is even.

    I'm just excited to see the best players play for the best teams and not get pigeonholed for some dump like NDSU or the MAC schools.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by SW_Mustang View Post

      That's how it's always worked. SEC teams did it all the time. Now the playing field is even.

      I'm just excited to see the best players play for the best teams and not get pigeonholed for some dump like NDSU or the MAC schools.
      You mean the best players play for the wealthiest teams.

      Comment


      • #18
        Personally, I think Dabo Swinney is on to something. One free transfer (unless the head coach leaves) and then sit out a year for any subsequent transfer. The current system seems out of control and fueled by big $$$$?
        https://www.d2football.com/images/forumextras/2026supporter.png[/IMG]

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by njmav1 View Post

          You mean the best players play for the wealthiest teams.
          Same thing.

          And I mean - when has it ever not been that way?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Thelakerman View Post
            Personally, I think Dabo Swinney is on to something. One free transfer (unless the head coach leaves) and then sit out a year for any subsequent transfer. The current system seems out of control and fueled by big $$$$?
            Dabo Swinney is so far behind and Clemson has fallen because of his reluctance to adapt. And instead of adapting, he whines.

            **second part isn’t a reaction to your post - just additional**
            Why should college sports be so different from the real world? People are free to change jobs whenever they want, unless they have signed a non-compete. Until contracts are involved widespread, people can, and SHOULD, do what’s best for them. Not what fans of schools think is best for them. The schools do not own the players. Without a contract, why in the world should the school get compensation if a player transfers. Sounds like sour grapes. Also, where does that stop? Do colleges have to start compensating high schools for “putting all the time and resources into making that player better”?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Thelakerman View Post
              Personally, I think Dabo Swinney is on to something. One free transfer (unless the head coach leaves) and then sit out a year for any subsequent transfer. The current system seems out of control and fueled by big $$$$?
              Woukd teams still be allowed to cut or pull schollies from players like they do now?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post

                Dabo Swinney is so far behind and Clemson has fallen because of his reluctance to adapt. And instead of adapting, he whines.

                **second part isn’t a reaction to your post - just additional**
                Why should college sports be so different from the real world? People are free to change jobs whenever they want, unless they have signed a non-compete. Until contracts are involved widespread, people can, and SHOULD, do what’s best for them. Not what fans of schools think is best for them. The schools do not own the players. Without a contract, why in the world should the school get compensation if a player transfers. Sounds like sour grapes. Also, where does that stop? Do colleges have to start compensating high schools for “putting all the time and resources into making that player better”?
                Additionally, a lot of those non-compete clauses are legally dubious, workers just lack the financial means to fight them. The previous administration tried to nullify them in the majority of cases by EO and I believe that fell through. Congress could pass a law, though...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by SW_Mustang View Post

                  Same thing.

                  And I mean - when has it ever not been that way?
                  Western Michigan was the best college men's hockey team last year. I don't think they were the wealthiest.

                  Comment

                  Ad3

                  Collapse
                  Working...
                  X