Committed
Brogan Klunk New Oxford HS (PA)| Football, Track |2026| OLB/ATH | 6’2 220lbs
https://www.hudl.com/profile/18242126/Brogan-Klunk
-
Bloom picked up commit from Millersville transfer Jalen Lee Nose/DT | 6’2 285 played this year as a red shirt freshman 3 years of eligibility left.Leave a comment:
-
First commit I could find: Luther Sehwah Downingtown East HS C/O 2026 5”11 170 CB/S/KR Team captain first team all-chesMont DB
https://www.hudl.com/profile/17809856/Luther-Sehwah lists 4.5 40Leave a comment:
-
Former Bloom football standout Miles Williams passed away according to BU Facebook.
https://playersbio.com/ex-university...illiams-death/Leave a comment:
-
This will be my last bit of big stat posting for the season and fittingly today is all about the final 20%. That's right, we're talking team red zone performance. Only three notes this time:- 2PA attempt are not included in this analysis as the play-by-play is not detailed enough.
- Only plays run inside of the opponent's 20 yard line are counted. If a drive starts at the OPP 18, loses 4 yards on first down, gains 6 yards on second down, and gains 0 yards on third down this will count as two red zone plays: first and 10 at the 18 and 3rd and 8 at the 16 as the second down play began at the 22 (not technically in the red zone).
- There is a minor discrepancy 4th down attempts compared to official numbers. The official play-by-play incorrectly lists BU as converting on 3rd and goal from the 30 in the LHU game and proceeding to score a TD on first and goal. The actual sequence of plays was a 28-yard gain on 3rd and goal (not a red zone third down) followed by a 2 yard TD on fourth and goal (red zone fourth down).
Plays Yards First Downs Big Stuffs/Losses Long TD INT Fumbles Lost 101 404 16 5 9 20 28 0 1 0
Rushing Carries Yards First Downs Big (10+) Stuffs (<= 0) Long TD Fumbles Lost 60 155 10 4 9 12 14 1 0
Passing Completions Attempts Yards Air Yards Long Big (20+) Losses (<=0) First Downs TD INT Fumbles Lost 24 41 249 222 20 1 0 6 14 0 0 0
3rd Downs Average Distance 5.48 Distance Conversions Attempts Percentage Short (0-3) 7 8 87.50% Medium (4-6) 2 5 40.00% Long (7-10) 5 7 71.43% Extreme (>10) 0 2 0.00% Totals 14 22 63.64%
4th Downs Average Distance 4.89 Distance Conversions Attempts Percentage Short (0-3) 4 4 100.00% Medium (4-6) 2 2 100.00% Long (7-10) 1 1 100.00% Extreme (>10) 0 1 0.00% Totals 7 8 87.50%
I'm quite surprised at how balanced the red zone scoring was with the ground game and air game both chipping in 14TDs. I suppose you could take this as a sign that the Huskies did make an effort not to be one-sided on offense this year. BU's third down performance in the red zone was not as good as it was across all third down plays; I don't know if this is a reflection of better execution by opposing defenses or the smaller space given to operate on "& goal" plays. The sample size is probably too small to draw realistic conclusions one way or the other. On the other hand BU was even better than usual on fourth down in the red zone but again the sample size is tiny. One thing that I think is worth noting - compared to the season passing & rushing stats the explosive play vs. stuff numbers look poor but keep in mind that the small length of field in these plays severely limits the possibility for these plays to occur. The only passing play that could constitute an explosive play is a 20 yard passing TD (BU achieved this in the opener vs. Fairmont State) and any play inside of the 10 yard line makes an explosive rush impossible in this definition (10+ yards). These numbers shouldn't be used to draw the conclusion that BU wasn't explosive as a whole.Leave a comment:
-
For the penultimate post I'll move into the first bit of team stats rather than individual. Today's tables are all about conversions. The notes:- There is a minor discrepancy in both 3rd and 4th down attempts. The official play-by-play incorrectly lists BU as converting on 3rd and goal from the 30 in the LHU game and proceeding to score a TD on first and goal. The actual sequence of plays was a 28-yard gain on 3rd and goal followed by a 2 yard TD on fourth and goal.
- The official play-by-play for the SRU game claims that BU punted on a 3rd and 9. I didn't have time to go back and see what the actual 3rd down play was.
3rd Downs Average Distance 7.21 Distance Conversions Attempts Percentage Short (0-3) 28 35 80.00% Medium (4-6) 18 33 54.55% Long (7-10) 22 51 43.14% Extreme (>10) 5 23 21.74% Totals 73 142 51.41%
4th Downs Average Distance 4.74 Distance Conversions Attempts Percentage Short (0-3) 7 9 77.78% Medium (4-6) 7 9 77.78% Long (7-10) 3 4 75.00% Extreme (>10) 0 1 0.00% Totals 17 23 73.91%
For a team that was not particularly good overall BU was excellent in this area of the game this season. The average third down distance was fairly high (7.21 yards is up into what I consider "long") but BU still managed the second best 3rd down percentage in the PSAC behind Kutztown and the sixth best in the entirety of D2(!), landing between Northern State and Indianapolis per the NCAA website. The numbers were somewhat buoyed up by a high conversion rate in short yardage but that alone doesn't explain the success; the Huskies were slightly more likely to make it than not in medium distances and even converted more than two out of every five attempts in long distances. For whatever their flaws I think Sheptock and Landis deserve credit for making good playcalls on third downs and the offense usually executed these plays well.
The Huskies were also excellent converting on fourth downs, finishing tops in the conference and eighth nationally (between Colorado Mesa and UT-Permian Basin). I think Sheptock and co. really improved here in both aggression and playcalling compared to last season when BU only went for it on 4th down 16 times and converted five. Having said that... given how often they trailed and how many games they ultimately lost by one score, I do wonder if BU might have been better off trying for fourth down conversions even more often. Were there more chances to push the advantage of BU's strong short-yardage performance and KJ Riley's oddly effective passing on fourth down? Would getting more total conversions but maybe settling for worse percentage be a fair tradeoff that increased the odds of winning? I can only think of one specifically bad fourth down punt decision (against Shepherd) but that doesn't mean there weren't more out there. I don't know what the break-even point is for fourth down attempts but a team with so many close losses and a poor kicking game should probably have been pushing right up against it.
I'm glad that the team improved in both of these areas compared to last year and I'm always hopeful they'll maintain it but I don't know how likely that is. This will be an offense in flux as the pass catchers and QB change over. There may be some regression in both areas due to worse execution on third and fourth down or worse execution on the early downs, making third and fourth downs less manageable. It's something to keep an eye on as next season plays out.Last edited by TheBigCat2192; 12-19-2025, 03:03 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Today's stats are for individual receiving. All of the notes for this table are repeats:- There is a minor stat discrepancy vs. the official numbers for Gabe Brower. This stems from a play in the Edinboro game that was credited as a one yard rush but was actually a flip pass on a fly sweep for a gain of one yard.
- A number of pass attempts this year (mostly interceptions) had no listed target. Two were easy to figure out but the others I've simply left unmarked. If you add up total targets in the later receiving post and compare with the total attempts you will find that they don't match.
- The play-by-play for the Seton Hill game does NOT include info on where a ball was thrown (“caught at” for completions and “thrown to” for incompletions.) As a result YAC reflects all games EXCEPT for the game at Seton Hill. This column will be marked with an asterisk to indicate that data is missing.
- The data here does not include 2PA as the play-by-play for them is incomplete.
Receiving Player Targets Receptions Yards YAC* First Downs Big (20+) Losses (< = 0) Long TD Fumbles Lost Achenbach 16 9 108 38 3 2 0 24 2 0 0 Brower 92 56 798 257 31 10 3 76 9 1 1 Clancy 2 2 55 4 2 1 0 48 0 0 0 Conway 3 2 13 0 1 0 0 10 1 0 0 Diaz 6 3 34 15 2 0 0 15 0 0 0 Griffen-Batchler 90 53 854 269 27 15 1 54 9 0 0 Mackinder 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Landis 16 8 86 14 4 1 0 25 1 0 0 Wojciechowski 29 12 160 11 5 4 0 29 1 0 0 Wolfe 54 42 427 230 18 4 2 60 3 0 0 Zimmerman 2 2 34 31 1 1 0 31 0 0 0
Griffen-Batchler finished off his career with another stellar season and I think it's a bit of a shame that we never managed to get him into a playoff game. When you consider that he missed a game and left the Ship game with injury but still lead the league in yards and was T-2nd in TDs I think he has a fair argument to be the best WR in the conference. At the very least I would consider him 1A/1B with whoever is the best of the West WRs. Brower also had a strong final season (third in yards and T-2nd in TDs) but he did play an extra game vs. Griffen-Batchler to compile stats and was less explosive; about 17.8% of his catches went for 20+ vs. 28.3% for JGB. Brower probably should have been a second-team all-East performer but I suppose he got dinged for losing yards on three plays and having a disaster fumble against Shepherd. Griffen-Batchler was the better receiver and contributed a lot on the return team; I do think there's a fair argument to be made that Brower was the better scrimmage player when you consider his rushing contributions while JGB did not have any carries unlike the prior two years. Wolfe's numbers look better than at the 1/3rd season tables I posted earlier this year - at that time he was averaging ~28 YPG, had five first downs, zero TDs, had more plays for a loss than explosive receptions, and his long was only 16 yards. Over the last seven games he took up a bigger part of the passing game, especially when Griffen-Batchler was out or limited, and as you can see here he picked up four explosive plays vs. only one loss and scored three TDs. He also improved his YAC (keep in mind that we are missing data from Seton Hill) from about 3.7* YPC to 5.9* YPC on the season which helped turn some of the checkdowns to him into productive plays. The rest of the team didn't really chip in a ton - Wojciechowski continued to serve as the deep shot guy but his only TD came in the opener against Fairmont State and Conway's only TD came in garbage time against Shepherd. Mackinder (listed as a R-Jr.) had his only target in garbage time against Millersville. As I mentioned in the post about rushing while Clancy had two timely fourth down catches and Zimmerman had one explosive catch neither player was a big contributor in the passing game.
Looking ahead to next season is somewhat concerning as BU is losing a lot. Based on class listing and guys who walked on Senior Day (Brower, Conway, Griffen-Batchler, Landis, Mackinder, and Wojciechowski) ~74% of this year's receiving yards and ~80% of this year's receiving TDs are gone. Wolfe is the most experienced returnee. His numbers improved over the back 2/3rds of the schedule and his final receiving tallies aren't dissimilar from what Brower did in 2024 so you might hope on a leap like Brower's in 2025 but I still feel he's best suited to a slot role rather than an outside receiver spot. The other likely WR returnees (by class as we still don't know what will happen with the portal), Achenbach and Diaz, have a combined career total of 12 receptions for 142 yards, 5 first downs, 2 explosive plays, and 2 TDs. Will one or both of them make a leap after another spring and fall camp out wide? Will one of the RS guys or someone in next season's recruiting cycle break into the teams plans? Is there the possibility of a portal WR or two to try and beef up this unit? BU also did not throw to TEs much this season. Will that change next year with Conway leaving and someone else likely joining non-target Archie Stephens in the TE rotation? Keep in mind that next season will also likely see a new QB so the inexperience out wide might crimp development under center as well. The coaches have a lot of questions to answer for this portion of the offense and I am very curious to see how they approach them.Last edited by TheBigCat2192; 12-12-2025, 07:45 PM. Reason: Fixed a few grammar/spelling errors and corrected Justin Wolfe's average YAC to account for missing data in the game at Seton Hill.Leave a comment:
-
I think we’d all like to see Zimmerman get into space more to utilize the speed and short area quickness he showed on return duty. The problem is that if you only ever have him running outside the defense will start to key on that after a few series and future opponents will do so during their film studies. Realistically Zimmerman had to run up the middle and Clancy had to run outside at times or teams would know exactly what was coming based on personnel. As I said in my rushing writeup I do wonder if a move to the slot/wing spot is a possibility for Zimmerman if he can work on his blocking and receiving during spring and fall camp. That would give him the opportunity to get the ball in space while still fitting into BU’s option scheme and allowing someone to run up the middle.Originally posted by BloomFootballDad View PostLeave a comment:
-
Excellent work here and breakdown. You provide some very interesting information to digest. To me, I’d like to see the offense get Zimmerman in space more than trying to have him run between the tackles. He is slippery in the open field. Clancy was effective running inside and always seemed to fall forward which I liked to see. The biggest question next year is who takes over as QB1. Unless an experienced portal option materializes the signal caller will be young and inexperienced next season. I believe a couple of the options on the roster have some talent and it will be interesting to see who grabs that spot. On the defensive side of the ball a lot of young guys saw time this year which should pay off starting next season. I think there’s a lot of talent on that side it just needs the time to gel. Their final record notwithstanding I thought the team grew as the season went on and think they’ll be much better for it starting in the spring and moving on into next fall. Go Huskies!Originally posted by TheBigCat2192 View Post
Leave a comment:
-
I finally found some more time to write this out; let's continue season stats with individual rushing. As usual I'll open with a few notes- There is a minor stat discrepancy vs. the official numbers for Gabe Brower and K.J. Riley. This stems from a play in the Edinboro game that was credited as a one yard rush but was actually a flip pass on a fly sweep for a gain of one yard.
- Eli Zimmerman is credited with one less rush and seven more yards than the official numbers. This is a personal evaluation of a play against Lock Haven that was listed as a rush for a seven yard loss but was more accurately described as a botched handoff. I opted to exclude this play as I believe the fault lies more with Riley or at best that the fault should be split. This was also Zimmerman's lone fumble on the season, but since the play is excluded he is credited here with none. If you'd like to treat the play as a rush and credit him with one fumble/one lost, feel free.
- Riley's rushing numbers exclude sacks but do include one fumble from a sack. I don't have a separate table set up for sacks and lost yardage so the fumble had to go somewhere. If you'd like to treat his fumble numbers as two fumbles/one lost, feel free.
- I cut goal line conversions and attempts from the short yardage rushing tables because the COUNTIFS were including plays that weren't actually goal to go (i.e. 2nd and 2 at the 3). I think I know how to fix it but decided to punt on it until next year.
Rushing Player Carries Yards First Downs Big (10+) Stuffs (< = 0) Long TD Fumbles Lost Brower 23 189 10 8 2 34 2 0 0 Clancy 145 633 39 14 19 34 4 0 0 Gee 4 17 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 Megginson 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Parker 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Riley 112 521 26 18 17 26 7 3 2 Wolfe 22 92 6 4 8 24 1 0 0 Zimmerman 83 304 18 8 15 21 4 0 0
Short Yardage Rushing Player ALLC ALLA ALL% 3DC 3DA 3D% 4DC 4DA 4D% Brower 1 1 100.00% 0 0 0 0 Clancy 24 28 85.71% 12 13 92.31% 2 2 100.00% Gee 1 1 100.00% 0 0 0 0 Riley 15 16 93.75% 5 6 83.33% 3 3 100.00% Wolfe 3 4 75.00% 1 2 50.00% 0 0 Zimmerman 10 15 66.67% 5 6 83.33% 0 0
The most surprising thing about these numbers to me is that Clancy and Zimmerman had roughly comparable big play numbers a 9.65% and 9.63% of carries gaining 10+ yards, respectively. I spent most of the season thinking of Zimmerman as the "lightning" to Clancy's "thunder" based on visual evaluation of speed/quickness and their body types but Zimmerman didn't actually have a higher rate of explosive plays. More concerning, Zimmerman was stuffed on ~18% of his carries vs. "only" ~13% for Clancy. Neither guy was really explosive enough but Zimmerman had a few too many "bust" plays compared to "boom" plays. Riley didn't run that great this year; even without sacks weighing him down his YPC is poor for a QB (remember that QBs typically have a higher YPC than RBs) but he did pick up some sort of conversion (first down or TD) on ~29.4% of his carries and most of his TDs were short which does suppress the yardage totals some. Wolfe's numbers look a little bit better than the 1/3 season check in but there are still a concerning number of negative plays (compare and contrast his big/stuff numbers to Brower, the other motion WR/option guy). Brower had great per carry production and I don't know that BU is going to replicate that out of the slot or wing spots next season with Wolfe alone. They used Diaz at times in the motion role; is he ready to step up and be a contributor out of the slot? Might Zimmerman (listed as a slot receiver on the roster) find himself back out there next season in a Wolfe/Brower role if he finds himself too far down the pecking order in the backfield? I don't think he's at risk of being cut or anything crazy. He looked okay as a true freshman and he performed well as a KR/PR but the numbers show some negative play concerns.
The last question leads me into next season. BU is going to have to figure out a logjam at RB; unless someone(s) higher up the list leaves via the portal (Megginson has already announced his entry) there are going to be four-five returnees who have served as a starter or backup and have a decent number of career carries on the roster.- Will there be more RB carries to go around next season with the turnover at QB and WR? BU threw the ball about 29 times per game this season vs. about 35 non-sack runs which is actually more balanced than I would have expected. Keep in mind that some of Riley's carries were scrambles on plays initially designed for passing so the numbers could have been even closer.
- Speaking of Riley; he and his rushing are gone next year. The only other QB on the roster to play, Gee, had more carries than passing attempts this season but still only saw four rushes. The numbers aren't terrible but I don't believe any of his plays against ESU or Shepherd were options. Can he execute option reads out of the mix of formations BU uses (pistol, shotgun with four wide, shotgun with two wings, rare flexbone?)
- Parker already saw his role decreased this season but in 2024 he had 48 carries which was second among RBs and had the most TDs among RBs with 6. Is there still a role for him here or has he lost any shot at meaningful playing time?
- Buchman is a similar player to Clancy with worse career stats and a history of both injuries and some fumble problems. Is he out of a "job"? BU did not operate out of many 2RB sets and usually alternated the backs more than rotated this year. Can both guys be on the roster and get carries?
- Sophomore (maybe medical RS) Jake Williams was the team's leading RB rusher by yards in 2024 although he only found the end zone once. His body type (listed at 5-10, 180) is somewhere between the bigger backs (Buchman & Clancy) and the smaller Zimmerman. What's his role if healthy? Is he number two? Number three?
- Can any of these guys catch the ball? Buchman has one career reception for 14 yards and a TD. Clancy had two fourth down conversions on two targets (one short and one long). Zimmerman had a 31-yard catch and run and a three yard swing pass. Parker has two career receptions for twelve yards. Williams doesn't have any receptions and I don't even know if he has any targets. BU hasn't used running backs much in the passing game under Sheptock; is that a reflection of Landis's philosophy or the personnel? BU did throw to RBs somewhat more often between 2021-2023 (about 15 times a year) but most of those throws were to Kaleb Monaco.
- There were two other RBs and three SLOTs listed on the roster as freshman this season who saw no playing time or ST time only. Will one of them force his way into the rotation next year? Might another recruit do so like Clancy and Zimmerman did this past year?
Leave a comment:
-
It took me quite a while to get around to this but I've finally finished updating my charted offensive stats for the season. Last time I shared them I got some good responses but posting all of the tables into one long comment screwed up the spacing something fierce so I will be splitting things up into multiple posts. I'll leave any notes and make some minor analysis after where possible. Let's start off with individual passing. First, some notes:- There is a minor stat discrepancy vs. the official numbers for Gabe Brower and K.J. Riley. This stems from a play in the Edinboro game that was credited as a one yard rush but was actually a flip pass on a fly sweep for a gain of one yard.
- A number of pass attempts this year (mostly interceptions) had no listed target. Two were easy to figure out but the others I've simply left unmarked. If you add up total targets in the later receiving post and compare with the total attempts you will find that they don't match.
- The play-by-play for the Seton Hill game does NOT include info on where a ball was thrown (“caught at” for completions and “thrown to” for incompletions.) As a result Air Yards, YAC, and passing by distance reflects all games EXCEPT for the game at Seton Hill. These stats will be marked with an asterisk to indicate that data is missing.
- Since BU and other SR1 teams are probably not paying for fancy player tracking (or not sharing with the fans if they are) “Air Yards” are based on the difference between the line of scrimmage and where a ball was thrown or caught. This means:
- Air Yards does not account for depth of QB dropback. I’m actually alright with this since it helps to sift out screens, shovel passes, and fly sweeps thrown at or behind the line of scrimmage.
- All throws into the endzone are treated as if they are thrown to the goal line (00). Obviously this is not true but I don’t have the time to watch every throw into the endzone and figure out how deep they were. If anyone with experience in play design would like to suggest a constant to add to endzone throws to adjust for this I’m open to the idea.
- The passing data here is only for Riley. I did not think it was worth the time or effort to chart Gabe Brower’s 0/1, 0 yard, 0 TD/1 INT performance on a trick play against Shippensburg or Tyler Gee's 0/1, 0 yard, 0TD/0INT performance against Millersville in garbage(ish) time.
Player Riley Totals Completions Attempts Yards Air Yards* Long Big (20+) Losses (< = 0) First Downs TD INT 189 320 2569 1471 76 38 6 94 26 12
Distance Completions* Attempts* Yards* Air Yards* Long* Big (20+)* Losses (< = 0)* First Downs* TD* INT* Behind (<= 0) 25 27 149 -42 16 0 3 6 0 0 Short (1-9) 95 129 859 508 54 5 2 45 7 2 Medium (10-19) 36 89 621 492 45 9 0 27 8 4 Long (20+) 21 47 711 513 76 21 0 11 9 4
Down Completions Attempts Yards Air Yards* Long Big (20+) Losses (< = 0) First Downs TD INT 1st 61 103 646 334 47 7 2 19 4 3 2nd 63 112 840 556 60 15 3 37 7 5 3rd 53 91 914 494 76 14 0 29 13 4 4th 12 14 169 87 48 2 1 9 2 0
Quarter Completions Attempts Yards Air Yards* Long Big (20+) Losses (< = 0) First Downs TD INT 1st 34 54 403 231 33 7 1 17 3 3 2nd 54 86 785 509 76 13 2 26 8 2 3rd 45 77 568 329 60 7 2 21 7 4 4th 51 96 774 374 53 11 1 29 7 3 OT 5 7 39 28 12 0 0 1 1 0
It's hard to believe after a few years of occasional time shares but Riley is gone. Next year BU is going to be giving the reins to someone inexperienced unless they hit the transfer portal for a seasoned quarterback. Riley attempted 320/322 (99.4%) of all passes this season. Riley was interception prone and scattershot at times this year but looking at the breakdown I think he deserves credit for performing well on 4th downs (small sample but 9 first downs + 2 TD is a very good conversion rate out of 14 attempts) and doing a better job of taking care of the ball in OT (again, small sample). There are probably going to be some growing pains under center next season, especially as a large percentage of this year's receiving yards and TDs will also be departing (more on that in a later comment.) Riley ends his career 5th all time in passing yards and (I believe) 5th all time in passing TDs although given BU's poor record during his time under center I don't know how we will look back on him in time.Leave a comment:
-
The league announced the end of season awards and three Huskies took home honors:- RB Declan Clancy was the East freshman of the year and second-team East
- WR Jerry Griffen-Batchler was first-team East
- QB KJ Riley was second-team East in a tie with LHU’s Jackson Ostrowsky
Last edited by TheBigCat2192; 11-20-2025, 07:52 AM.Leave a comment:
-
Trying to figure out the senior class from Saturday. Twitter had 16 pictures pregame. Instagram had pictures of 18 players walking on game day. Jim Doyle said 17 in his broadcast. Looking at all sources, I came up with 20 graduates. No OL leaving. Hoping some R-Juniors come back for graduate school.
Seniors:
WR Griffen Batchelor #1
QB Riley #2
WR Brower #5
WR Landis #22 Graduate student
DL McLaurin #91
R-Juniors graduating:
DB Greene #4
DL Hazzard #5
WR Wojciechowski #8
DB Adams #10
WR Mackinder #10
DB Mitchell #20
LB Williams #24
K McGonigle #38
FB/TE Conway #45
DL Paul #53
DL Battaglia #67
TE Filoon #83
WR Marcinkevich #86
DL Corros #90
DL Diaz #98
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bart View Post
Flip side is half the recruited freshmen class is gone by the next Spring session.Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RockPride View Post
Dr. Evil always looked down at transfers. He always preached SRU didn't want mercenaries.
But, that was his era -- and in fairness it was a much different world then.
Tort has gone about 85 percent home-grown and supplements immediate needs with the right (talent and character) transfers. He's also had incredible retention rates (even through their two shaky years).Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: