Originally posted by Ship69
View Post
Title IX has gone too far in trying to match the number of sports available based on a enrollment ratio.
I think that metric is no longer valid to ensure equity for women in sports.
Almost every university has plenty of sports for women but it came at the expense of opportunities for men.
You don't achieve equality or equity by taking away from one to allow the other to catch up.
You provide the opportunities so that the side the was shut out has the same level of opportunity.
That is why so many right wingers fight the oppressed groups...they see rights as pie that can only go to so many people which is false.
IUP should not have had to cut men's soccer and wrestling so they could have created new teams for women.
They should have just found the way to provide the opportunities and the state and feds should have provided the funding to schools to get womens sports ramped up.
I supported the need for Title IX...but like many good deeds...they overshoot their intended ourcome...taking away what the men already had was not the answer. It was giving the women the same amount of access to play sports.
IUP may be 62 percent women...but I bet a minority percentage of the female student population gives a rats ass about sports but I can imagine a majority of the 38 percent of men do.
Comment