Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Health Status for Big Game This Week

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hard to judge from the SVSU perspective as FSU gave us 7 turnovers and we still couldn't get the job done and it seems like GVSU pounded us without even running an offensive snap in the 1st half, ok they ran a few but seriously we gave them a lot in that 1st half. Very even in talent and something tells me these 2 teams will be seeing each other again down the road. Give me GVSU in this round but I'll take Annese in the playoffs. Both teams have the talent to win the National Championship.

    Comment


    • #17
      Guess I’ll answer my own question lol... from what I’ve heard/seen the vast majority of the guys I mentioned/others I didn’t are at least going to try and give it a go on sat.... the only ones I’m unsure of still for GV is Gorball, for Ferris I’m unsure on M Campbell... sounds like Davis for Ferris is out

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Gliac_fan10 View Post
        Guess I’ll answer my own question lol... from what I’ve heard/seen the vast majority of the guys I mentioned/others I didn’t are at least going to try and give it a go on sat.... the only ones I’m unsure of still for GV is Gorball, for Ferris I’m unsure on M Campbell... sounds like Davis for Ferris is out
        As in, a guy who has caught two balls in five games? I can think of a lot of folks for Ferris whose absence would have a decidedly more significant impact on the game...

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Irishlaker View Post

          As in, a guy who has caught two balls in five games? I can think of a lot of folks for Ferris whose absence would have a decidedly more significant impact on the game...
          Admittedly on the surface it’s not that big of a deal but TA has really burned GV in the past with some 2 and 3 TE personnel groupings so that package is probably not available now... that’s why I mentioned him

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Gliac_fan10 View Post

            Admittedly on the surface it’s not that big of a deal but TA has really burned GV in the past with some 2 and 3 TE personnel groupings so that package is probably not available now... that’s why I mentioned him
            Fair. LOL...I almost posed the question of his value in the run game/blocking schemes in my last post, but landed on the side of brevity. Serves me right I guess...

            Comment

            Ad3

            Collapse
            Working...
            X