Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Week 4 Games

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ASUPops
    replied
    Originally posted by Great White Buffalo View Post

    This appears to be a case of one of two extremes, he is either doing too much, micro-managing the assistant coaches OR he is giving the assistant coaches too much leeway.
    The defensive schemes are unchanged from the first year and the offensive approach also has not changed. I am voting for #1, micro-managing.
    Well....first problem is there is no dedicated DC. Next is a mixed level of coaching talent. You have two former DII HCs and then guys from Juco, Panhandle State, etc....

    My other issue is lack of leadership & talent amongst the coaching staff. You need ONE strong leader.

    The team has the players. LOTS of talent!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Great White Buffalo
    replied
    Originally posted by AngeloFan View Post

    WT coach is fine right where he is at. I vote to let him stay and keep doing what he is doing.
    This appears to be a case of one of two extremes, he is either doing too much, micro-managing the assistant coaches OR he is giving the assistant coaches too much leeway.
    The defensive schemes are unchanged from the first year and the offensive approach also has not changed. I am voting for #1, micro-managing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AngeloFan
    replied
    Originally posted by IronOre View Post

    Maybe the WT coach can go to SFU!
    WT coach is fine right where he is at. I vote to let him stay and keep doing what he is doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • IronOre
    replied
    Originally posted by Great White Buffalo View Post

    As opposed to Wt keeping a Coach too long?
    Maybe the WT coach can go to SFU!

    Leave a comment:


  • Great White Buffalo
    replied
    Originally posted by IronOre View Post

    They haven't been able to keep a coach long enough to build a program.
    As opposed to Wt keeping a Coach too long?

    Leave a comment:


  • IronOre
    replied
    Originally posted by Buffalo/Islander Alum View Post

    Trying to get a feel of their skill level.

    They have only won a couple of games the last several years and those appear to be against non D2 competition.

    They looked much more competitive in the mid 2010s.
    They haven't been able to keep a coach long enough to build a program.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buffalo/Islander Alum
    replied
    Originally posted by IronOre View Post

    https://www.d2football.com/lsc-week-4-recap/

    I really want to see SFU improve, but they sure don't seem capable of it.
    Trying to get a feel of their skill level.

    They have only won a couple of games the last several years and those appear to be against non D2 competition.

    They looked much more competitive in the mid 2010s.

    Leave a comment:


  • IronOre
    replied
    Originally posted by cwfenn View Post
    Recaps will be up in a couple hours.
    https://www.d2football.com/lsc-week-4-recap/

    I really want to see SFU improve, but they sure don't seem capable of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    Recaps will be up in a couple hours.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    TAMUK won 43-10

    MSU won 77-0

    WNMU lost 34-7

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    Originally posted by Great White Buffalo View Post
    UTPB - 27
    WO - 24

    Final
    Thanks, didn’t think they would score again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Great White Buffalo
    replied
    UTPB - 27
    WO - 24

    Final

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    ASU is up 34-14, Pitts got an 89-yard pick six to put it away.

    Abilene up 17-7 at the half. WNMU hanging in there but they’re struggling to move the ball.

    The other games are blowouts.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    MSU now up 35-0, backups already coming in.
    TAMUK up 28-3
    ASU up 20-7, they’re starting to assert themselves
    Abilene up 10-7, WNMU hanging in there

    Leave a comment:


  • cwfenn
    replied
    Abilene up 10-7 in the second
    TAMUK up 21-3 in the second
    MSU up 21-0 in the second
    ASU up 13-7 in the third

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X