It's inevitable that these two will be compared so now that the 18-19 rosters are set, which of these coaches did more for their new programs for this coming season?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by boatcapt View PostIt's inevitable that these two will be compared so now that the 18-19 rosters are set, which of these coaches did more for their new programs for this coming season?
Kind of hard to say before they've played a game.
There's certainly still a good story to be told about Sancomb's firing. I doubt we ever hear it, however.
Both are likely in for very long seasons.
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View PostKind of hard to say before they've played a game.
There's certainly still a good story to be told about Sancomb's firing. I doubt we ever hear it, however.
Both are likely in for very long seasons.
Comment
-
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by boatcapt View PostBut you predicted WLU AND Fairmont will join the PSAC and the MEC will fold, why so reluctant to weigh in on which new HC has been more successful in their first year???
Cal hasn't posted its roster yet. That's the main reason.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Next to nobody in the PSAC West has posted rosters yet.
I don't get it, either.
I know why IUP hasn't as there is a major item being worked out. The only two posted are UPJ and Clarion -- two schools that don't get involved in the Fort Knox secrecy games the rest of them play. Seton Hill has a version posted although it's far from accurate (from what I hear) ... and the fact it still lists a current Gannon player.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by boatcapt View PostWonder why? I mean, the semester has started so presumably all the players must be enrolled and on campus right?
http://mobile.twitter.com/CaluHoops/...29012058628096
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by Zach Simpson View PostThe question will not be a one year answer, it will be which school supports the program over the next 5 years.
CalU seems to be in on Sandcomb so we shall see.
I think they will be in the running for 6th this year in the west.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Absolute best-case WJ could finish third in the MEC. My suspicion is you have Fairmont, West Liberty and then a huge gap to the rest. Notre Dame could be decent if Vorhees returns healthy. Who knows ... maybe this 'big' WJ got is another Sleva-type. WL's speed and pressure didn't effect him at all.
Of the five Cal has listed as returnees, a couple of them are very solid players. Pegram will be a big boost. For all we know at this point, Sancomb could have landed a big star (like Edinboro did last year). Losing Howze is a major issue -- whatever the reason was. Danny showed the ability at WJ to adapt to different styles of play. McBride refused to do that at Cal and his teams were often vastly over-matched and physically beaten in the West -- with defense nowhere to be found.
In the grand scheme of who will do better ... probably need at least 2-3 years to get a vibe on it.
While on the topic, I don't really expect the guy at Fairmont to stay there very long. I suspect 1-2 more years max and he'll follow the Calhoun route.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
The new coach at Jesuit maybe the next great coach in the region...I will give him this, he is connected enough to bring in guys from all over. I don't think they are just bodies, some look to be decent players.
On the other hand, Sancomb is tried and proven and I don't have any doubts will be successful. He may not have the studs this year but you can bet that the team will play good defense, be physically tough and will play hard consistently which I think will be an immediate improvement. Just may take a year or 2 to challenge at the top of the league.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View PostAbsolute best-case WJ could finish third in the MEC. My suspicion is you have Fairmont, West Liberty and then a huge gap to the rest. Notre Dame could be decent if Vorhees returns healthy. Who knows ... maybe this 'big' WJ got is another Sleva-type. WL's speed and pressure didn't effect him at all.
Of the five Cal has listed as returnees, a couple of them are very solid players. Pegram will be a big boost. For all we know at this point, Sancomb could have landed a big star (like Edinboro did last year). Losing Howze is a major issue -- whatever the reason was. Danny showed the ability at WJ to adapt to different styles of play. McBride refused to do that at Cal and his teams were often vastly over-matched and physically beaten in the West -- with defense nowhere to be found.
In the grand scheme of who will do better ... probably need at least 2-3 years to get a vibe on it.
While on the topic, I don't really expect the guy at Fairmont to stay there very long. I suspect 1-2 more years max and he'll follow the Calhoun route.
Guy at Fairmont is bound to be a bust because everyone knows you can't replace a really good coach with another really good coach!! Hahahaha!!Last edited by boatcapt; 09-04-2018, 02:05 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Peckenpaugh v. Sancomb?
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View PostPegram will be a big boost. .
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment