Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2023-2024 NWMSU Bearcats

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NWFanatic
    replied
    I won’t mention the team or players name but at a NW win this year a certain player came out of the game as often as possible when his team was on defense. It appeared he was only interested in scoring. Don’t think you’d ever see that with one of Ben’s guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • libertybearcat
    replied
    Originally posted by Alfred33 View Post
    This team has grown so much offensively through the course of the year (I"m not sure why I ever doubt that they'll figure it out). They're movement is so much better now and they do a variety of different things from ball screens, to double screens, they'll pick and pop, pick and roll, they'll slip it, and they just seem to be making the right play most of the time. Getting Isaiah back healthy is a huge difference from the where they were the beginning of the season. Him just taking that ball handling pressure off of Bennett has helped balance the floor and has probably kept Bennett upright. I want to give some props to the only starter that didn't get all-conference recognition. Daniel Abreu has been playing as well as anyone on this team for several weeks now. He's been great... the last 7 games, he's averaged 14.2 a game. He's so unselfish, works hard and just finds himself in the right spot for rebounds, putbacks, etc., and more importantly, he's found his shot. He started the season shooting pretty miserably from 3 (2-18 before January) to the point that he shied away from shooting them. I know the whole time Ben wanted him to be a willing shooter and kept pushing him... with guys like Isaiah and Byron that don't look to shoot, Daniel has to. Once he started finding it, NW, as a whole, really started playing better. He's 18-40 (45%) from 3 since the turn of the calendar year. Not bad for your "center".
    So much fun watching them play. Funny how most teams can't figure out how sharing the ball, being unselfish and making the extra pass makes them so much better...NW's Men have been showing that for many years.

    Leave a comment:


  • NWFanatic
    replied
    Daniel had 20 pts and several key rebounds in 35 minutes( he never came out til the game was well in hand). He’s been an early game spark several times recently and tonight he never let up. If he keeps this up he may have a shot at the all tourney team😎
    Last edited by NWFanatic; 03-08-2024, 12:23 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alfred33
    replied
    This team has grown so much offensively through the course of the year (I"m not sure why I ever doubt that they'll figure it out). They're movement is so much better now and they do a variety of different things from ball screens, to double screens, they'll pick and pop, pick and roll, they'll slip it, and they just seem to be making the right play most of the time. Getting Isaiah back healthy is a huge difference from the where they were the beginning of the season. Him just taking that ball handling pressure off of Bennett has helped balance the floor and has probably kept Bennett upright. I want to give some props to the only starter that didn't get all-conference recognition. Daniel Abreu has been playing as well as anyone on this team for several weeks now. He's been great... the last 7 games, he's averaged 14.2 a game. He's so unselfish, works hard and just finds himself in the right spot for rebounds, putbacks, etc., and more importantly, he's found his shot. He started the season shooting pretty miserably from 3 (2-18 before January) to the point that he shied away from shooting them. I know the whole time Ben wanted him to be a willing shooter and kept pushing him... with guys like Isaiah and Byron that don't look to shoot, Daniel has to. Once he started finding it, NW, as a whole, really started playing better. He's 18-40 (45%) from 3 since the turn of the calendar year. Not bad for your "center".
    Last edited by Alfred33; 03-07-2024, 09:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZubCat81
    replied
    Strong performance by this NW Bearcat team tonight 80-52 over a good athletic MW team. One thing I really liked seeing was this Bearcat team attacking the offensive boards like a team possessed ... 14 offensive rebounds! Don't see teams these days going after the boards on the offensive side of the court ... usually backing away from missed shots and setting up on the other side of the court to play defense. Not nearly as true in the old days. I was giddy seeing these NW players thinking there was more to play for after missed shots. Crazy stat on the MW side was that despite losing by 28 points tonight, they still basically shot 50% from the field, altho hurt a bit by their 1-10 shots falling from the 3-pt line. Bearcats shot 9-16 for 3-pts. Just an overall strong defensive performance by NW and some incredible individual hustle performances.
    Last edited by ZubCat81; 03-07-2024, 07:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ZubCat81
    replied
    Enjoyed hearing our new NW President Lance Tatum during the KXCV halftime show with Coffey. Unlike some university presidents who show up to elbow their way to get their picture taken while plugging 'his' school and himself, this NW President Tatum, not only loved plugging the people of the Maryville community and the staff and students at NW, but really loved talking Bearcat basketball and plugging the individual play of Bearcat players. Nice to have a guy who already has bought into Bearcat basketball for both our men's and women's BB teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • NWFanatic
    replied
    Lady Bearcats make the semis with a 64-42 win over the Lady Lopers

    Leave a comment:


  • Alfred33
    replied
    Originally posted by D2Rover View Post
    I'd lean towards giving it to the coach who had the best performance that year, since it is coach of the... year. If we're having a conversation about best coaches overall, there's more that goes into it, but the award should go to who did the most with what they had, even if they do kind of deal themselves a good or bad hand with the recruiting and roster management in previous years.
    I don’t disagree, but winning the conference is the “best” performance someone could have. Now should it be given to who did more with less or who was the bigger surprise? I don’t know… like I said, I don’t think either one is wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • D2Rover
    replied
    I'd lean towards giving it to the coach who had the best performance that year, since it is coach of the... year. If we're having a conversation about best coaches overall, there's more that goes into it, but the award should go to who did the most with what they had, even if they do kind of deal themselves a good or bad hand with the recruiting and roster management in previous years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alfred33
    replied
    I see both sides of it…. I mean Ben could’ve won the damn award 11 straight times if you just awarded the winner every year. I mean, he couldn’t really do any better than he did by winning, and if you’re picked first, you don’t have the opportunity to exceed expectations. On the other side of it, recruiting and those things are something that takes place over time and not necessarily limited to THAT year. So I can side on giving it to the coach of a team that over-performed their expected result. Especially if they don’t necessarily have the same caliber of players, which circles back to where we started. I don’t think either one is wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrAugustana
    replied
    Originally posted by D2Rover View Post
    Kind of kills the point of a "coach of the year" if it is almost automatically given to the team with the best performance, doesn't it?
    I lean more toward northwest missouri state's suggestion that the coach likely had something to do with recruiting/developing/leading/coaching the team with the best performance. Coaches rarely go to bed one night and wake up the next day with the best team in the conference.

    Leave a comment:


  • D2Rover
    replied
    Kind of kills the point of a "coach of the year" if it is almost automatically given to the team with the best performance, doesn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • northwest missouri state
    replied
    i generally agree with the league's approach. maybe they need a most improved type award - or maybe they don't - but the team that finishes first typically has the coach that did the best job, recruited the best players, did the best job developing them, etc.

    save for situations when a first yr coach inherits the keys to a cadillac or inherited a clunker & made significant strides.

    Leave a comment:


  • southside
    replied
    Originally posted by GrifFan View Post

    I had to go back and look - they were picked 5th. The co-coaches of the year were both picked ahead of them, so by whatever standard you want to use, Rob should have been the choice. (Heard him do color for the home NW games - he did a nice job).
    He does do a good job doing the color. He does really well Breaking down situations as the game ebbs and flows.

    Leave a comment:


  • southside
    replied
    Originally posted by Alfred33 View Post

    Yeah, I knew that it was probable that the conference champion’s coach would win… I was just putting my own Heisman campaign out there for Austin. Candi has done a fantastic job at MoWest… Great hire from the start and she deserves her accolades. I’m just a bit shocked NW has played itself into this position and I’m still not convinced they’re even that good. They sure don’t look like it when they play the Griffs. I could just as easily see them losing tomorrow as winning. I never dreamed this team would have a chance at the post season, but hopefully they keep proving me and all those preseason voters wrong!
    I think nw has a good shot. A win would help for sure. Tourney time and some crazy movement can happen. AM has done a good job getting nw women back on track.

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X