Originally posted by Ram Tough
View Post
xxx
Conf | 2022 | 2021 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | xxx | 2022 FCS | 2021 FCS |
NE10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
PSAC | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | |
MEC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
GMAC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
CIAA | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
SAC | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SIAC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
No real change: MEC, GMAC, CIAA
Fewer teams: NE10, SAC
More teams: PSAC
Unknown: SIAC
I think the PSAC we be against it as would the SAC.
Would the NE10 view getting a guaranteed team in the playoffs to be more enticing than the possibility of getting shut out as they did in 2019?
I think the SIAC would vote in favor in order to avoid getting shut out and having an opportunity to for two teams (in a theoretical situation where someone upset Benedict this year).
I think the CIAA is generally getting one team in, but I think they would vote for change for the same reason that the SIAC would.
I am unsure of how the MEC and GMAC would vote.
Leave a comment: