Originally posted by SW_Mustang
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
July 1 - Moving Day 2024
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
-
Free to read once you register....but sad commentary on where we are today with D1 athletics...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...march-madness/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bballfan View Post
Nope. And the rich just get richer. The upsets in the tournament is where "March Madness" gets its name. Not really interested in seeing chalk. No magical tournament runs in that.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post
Meanwhile, we're on the verge of one of the most "chalk-iest" Final Fours in recent memory. Hardly any non-Power Five teams making it to the Sweet 16 this year, and it doesn't strike me as a good sign for the future.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SW_Mustang View Post
More or less my point. We had to pander to the small schools because they couldn't hang with the big boys. Having two DIs is silly.
Could really insert any FCS school in there though. None of them are competing with Ohio State, despite being DI.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EastStroud13 View Post
Interesting you bring up North Dakota State considering how dominant they have been in FCS. Arguably DI is exactly where they should be. Saint Francis is a totally different story.
Could really insert any FCS school in there though. None of them are competing with Ohio State, despite being DI.Last edited by SW_Mustang; 03-28-2025, 04:38 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SW_Mustang View Post
It's an ego thing. Most of the people beating their chests about being DI don't actually care about the sports. They think the title makes them better than everyone else when in reality, it has no real tangible value.
In theory, the divisional structure should be about optimizing competition. Allowing St. Francis or North Dakota State to compete for the same basketball trophy as Duke and UConn is silly. A lot of these DIs could drop down a level or two, use the savings to restructure/invest in their programs, and actually compete. But they'd rather just parade around telling people how great they are without actually being great at anything.
IMO - if a school has to tell us they're DI, then they shouldn't be. If Alabama, Clemson, or Michigan constantly told us they were DI - it would be embarrassing. I think the same should apply.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPNation View PostIs it really worth it to move up so that your basketball team might be a 16 seed sacrifice once a decade or so?
In theory, the divisional structure should be about optimizing competition. Allowing St. Francis or North Dakota State to compete for the same basketball trophy as Duke and UConn is silly. A lot of these DIs could drop down a level or two, use the savings to restructure/invest in their programs, and actually compete. But they'd rather just parade around telling people how great they are without actually being great at anything.
IMO - if a school has to tell us they're DI, then they shouldn't be. If Alabama, Clemson, or Michigan constantly told us they were DI - it would be embarrassing. I think the same should apply.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bballfan View Post
I have never heard of it before, but outside my regional area I don't know my D3 schools.
Curious if there will be more "D1 schools" decide to "opt out" and follow the St. Francis path? With constraints on operating budgets, and the constant change that is occurring with the NCAA now on a daily basis, does it even make sense for small private schools to try and keep up?
IMO - the NCAA needs to restructure the divisions. It won't happen, because there's too much money in some places and too much bureaucracy in others, and these smaller schools really have their identity wrapped up in "being DI" to accept change.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bballfan View Post
I have never heard of it before, but outside my regional area I don't know my D3 schools.
Curious if there will be more "D1 schools" decide to "opt out" and follow the St. Francis path? With constraints on operating budgets, and the constant change that is occurring with the NCAA now on a daily basis, does it even make sense for small private schools to try and keep up?
I see more schools falling down. They just can’t compete. I won’t be shocked if some former D2 schools come back to D2.
Is it really worth it to move up so that your basketball team might be a 16 seed sacrifice once a decade or so?
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPNation View Post
A school not even on the radar in the Philadelphia metro area. Most people here have no clue this school even exists much less had sports teams.
Curious if there will be more "D1 schools" decide to "opt out" and follow the St. Francis path? With constraints on operating budgets, and the constant change that is occurring with the NCAA now on a daily basis, does it even make sense for small private schools to try and keep up?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by laker View Post
Leave a comment:
-
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
With an operating deficit of almost $50 million since 2007, how exactly is this school even still open?!?!? And with no sports who exactly will attend it?
https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia...ge-sports-cut/
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: