Originally posted by BearcatDude
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Regional Rankings
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by TSU_Mike59 View Post
I posted this on another thread:
As an alum who played FB back in the MIAA days, it did to me [bothered me that we left] at first as well, but then it became very clear that the MIAA was moving into markets and areas that didn’t suit Truman at all - adding lengthy, lengthy trips from far northeast Missouri to central Oklahoma, western Kansas, and central Nebraska, when, on the flip side, they could add multiple trips to St. Louis, Kansas City and central Illinois/Chicago where they have a larger alumni base and primarily were recruiting not just athletes but student to the University. It was a no-brainer.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GreenwoodBearcat View Post
And exactly why did Truman leave the MIAA? Simply because they were middle road or doormats in the MIAA and couldn't ever see themselves making the playoffs.
As an alum who played FB back in the MIAA days, it did to me [bothered me that we left] at first as well, but then it became very clear that the MIAA was moving into markets and areas that didn’t suit Truman at all - adding lengthy, lengthy trips from far northeast Missouri to central Oklahoma, western Kansas, and central Nebraska, when, on the flip side, they could add multiple trips to St. Louis, Kansas City and central Illinois/Chicago where they have a larger alumni base and primarily were recruiting not just athletes but student to the University. It was a no-brainer.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TSU_Mike59 View Post
Plays the SOS game? Meaning, Truman’s conference has open dates, so Truman goes out and schedules four teams who will finish at or above .500, including two (Davenport and Ashland) who are going to make the playoffs, one (SD Mines) who hasn’t lost a game this year to a team with fewer than 7 wins, and another (Hillsdale), who is .500 and not some bottom-dweller?
Is that what “playing the SOS game” means? I call that “challenging themselves in nonconference to prove they have talent because they know the bottom of the GLVC isn’t very strong.”
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Predatory Primates View Post
Like I say, I'm torn on it because I don't think either conference should be rewarded. One is lazy, the other is running a pyramid scheme.
I want the silo to go away, too. It will take fans and boosters becoming activists and putting pressure on administrators, though, and I'm not sure getting jobbed out of one playoff will be enough to make that happen.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TSU_Mike59 View Post
Plays the SOS game? Meaning, Truman’s conference has open dates, so Truman goes out and schedules four teams who will finish at or above .500, including two (Davenport and Ashland) who are going to make the playoffs, one (SD Mines) who hasn’t lost a game this year to a team with fewer than 7 wins, and another (Hillsdale), who is .500 and not some bottom-dweller?
Is that what “playing the SOS game” means? I call that “challenging themselves in nonconference to prove they have talent because they know the bottom of the GLVC isn’t very strong.”
Who are you taking NW or Emporia vs. UIndy or Truman...... (The DOGS left the conference for a reason....they competed yearly with Lincoln, SBU, MOSO you name it for the crown of the bottom tier.) I know that was the past, but seriously, look at the more recent (post season) matchups when they are presented. The answer to the first question is very obvious.
Now a legit question...Where do you think TSU or UIndy would finish in the MIAA? How about the other conferences in the region? (We have a flawed system!)
Let's get to the FCS model where they actually try to get the best teams into the post season regardless of region!
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TSU_Mike59 View Post
Plays the SOS game? Meaning, Truman’s conference has open dates, so Truman goes out and schedules four teams who will finish at or above .500, including two (Davenport and Ashland) who are going to make the playoffs, one (SD Mines) who hasn’t lost a game this year to a team with fewer than 7 wins, and another (Hillsdale), who is .500 and not some bottom-dweller?
Is that what “playing the SOS game” means? I call that “challenging themselves in nonconference to prove they have talent because they know the bottom of the GLVC isn’t very strong.”
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CatFan88 View Post
Because Truman and Indy play the SOS game.
Is that what “playing the SOS game” means? I call that “challenging themselves in nonconference to prove they have talent because they know the bottom of the GLVC isn’t very strong.”
Edited because my brain just got teams jumbled in my head. Was trying to say Hillsdale beat Ashland and instead said Truman beat Ashland.Last edited by TSU_Mike59; 11-06-2022, 12:49 PM.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Predatory Primates View Post
Like I say, I'm torn on it because I don't think either conference should be rewarded. One is lazy, the other is running a pyramid scheme.
I want the silo to go away, too. It will take fans and boosters becoming activists and putting pressure on administrators, though, and I'm not sure getting jobbed out of one playoff will be enough to make that happen.
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CatFan88 View Post
Because Truman and Indy play the SOS game. The MIAA shouldn't be rewarded, at all. The time has come and gone for the MIAA to be taught a hard lesson about silo scheduling. I want NW to make the PO's but I can tolerate the penalty of missing the PO's if it wipes silo scheduling off the board.
I want the silo to go away, too. It will take fans and boosters becoming activists and putting pressure on administrators, though, and I'm not sure getting jobbed out of one playoff will be enough to make that happen.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Predatory Primates View PostI'm torn on the subject. The MIAA shouldn't be rewarded for the silo crap, but I'm not sure the glvc teams would make the playoffs if they were in any of the other 3 conferences.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the Northeasterner View PostI don't know if Truman gets in with loss but Indy has real strong SOS because it all those gliac games they played. If obu wins I think it's the miaa runner up vs glvc runner up.Last edited by CatFan88; 11-06-2022, 06:34 AM.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Redwing View Post
No argument from me on that. I suspect that's the issue the committee may be struggling with. Monday will shine some light on it.
As the season has played out, Pitt is a ESU kicker from having 1 loss, and a bit better play from NW from having 2 losses themselves. Both ESU and NW killed themselves vs. UCO and Pitt or could be sitting where Pitt is instead.......
So....I think it is right and easily justifiable for the committee to let the win and in scenario's do their thing..... Indy vs. TSU and NW vs. Emporia, winners take all. Easiest and fairest choice for the committee.
Now....can we please look HARD at implementing the system that the FCS employs. It seems they get the best teams in the playoffs and then regionalize things as best they can.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by reloadmvp View Post
Don’t worry. We lost to that trash team too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by the Northeasterner View PostA ND to be real honest, I'm dont think NWMsU is as well rounded as Emporia is.
That said, I don't know that they know how to win with their backs against the wall like NW has done a few times this season.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: