Originally posted by Vulpes88
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lions at texans
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Turbonium; 11-24-2019, 03:14 PM.
- 1 like
-
[QUOTE=Turbonium;n458573]Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
Ah, so if it impacts you the system is broken but otherwise who cares. Sometimes there are conference matchups in the first round, it happens rather frequently. You were supposed to be the big bad national champions, it shouldn't matter who the opponent was. As said, I'd have rather seen Commerce @ Mines but now I guess I do get to see that matchup.
- 1 like
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Turbonium;n458573]Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
Ah, so if it impacts you the system is broken but otherwise who cares. Sometimes there are conference matchups in the first round, it happens rather frequently. You were supposed to be the big bad national champions, it shouldn't matter who the opponent was. As said, I'd have rather seen Commerce @ Mines but now I guess I do get to see that matchup.
Comment
-
It was going to be difficult to avoid a first round rematch this year. Either conference otherwise. If it plays out like years past with standard seeding, then Pueblo/Commerce would have played a rematch first round. Again, not a conference foe, but still a rematch.
1) MSU
Bye
4) Pueblo
5) Commerce
3) Mines
6) Augustana
2) Tarleton
7) Sioux Falls
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
When did I say the system is broken? What good is it going to do complaining about ot on a board of a different conference? Imo out of conference games then in the second round it happens it happens. Conference rematches should be good games. Any other words you want to put in my mouth?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View PostIt was going to be difficult to avoid a first round rematch this year. Either conference otherwise. If it plays out like years past with standard seeding, then Pueblo/Commerce would have played a rematch first round. Again, not a conference foe, but still a rematch.
1) MSU
Bye
4) Pueblo
5) Commerce
3) Mines
6) Augustana
2) Tarleton
7) Sioux Falls
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View PostHow do you see that matchup? I havent seen much of mines, but from what I have seen the QB is a real dual threat and the d seems pretty stout. With the way our defense has gelled the past month and the emergence of Smalls beginning to impose his will, I like our chances but expect it to be close. The teams seem pretty similar to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
Let's say the goal is to eliminate rematches altogether. I'd rather eliminate conference rematches but just hypothetically. Why not swap Commerce and Augustana?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Purple Mav Man View Post
That works. But then there are complaints about teams switching seeds (and possibly a different draw, 5 and 6 in different halves of bracket). It would still be a noisy argument, just the opposite of the current one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
Let's say the goal is to eliminate rematches altogether. I'd rather eliminate conference rematches but just hypothetically. Why not swap Commerce and Augustana?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View Post
They were SUPPOSED to be able to switch teams to other regions, and with the region 3 teams playing there were plenty of opportunities for non flight matchups for both commerce on the road and tarleton at home.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment