I think it will boil down to the precise wording of the appointment letter. If it is worded as "this is an extension of the contract," Gannon could be on the hook for what it says in the original contract...if it makes clear that it is a wholly separate agreement, then Gannon will probably prevail...if it is mushy and unclear about being separate from the original contract and can be interpreted either way...both sides will probably settle.
If I were a betting man, I'd say that both sides quietly settle for 12 months and move on. That's the way these things usually work out. Only people that win by pushing this to the bitter end is the lawyers.
If I were a betting man, I'd say that both sides quietly settle for 12 months and move on. That's the way these things usually work out. Only people that win by pushing this to the bitter end is the lawyers.
Comment