Originally posted by Purple Mav Man
View Post
I don’t watch/care enough about women’s basketball to have a respectable opinion, but I do wonder if that contributes to the fewer eyeballs for the women’s tournament. There are no Creightons, Northern Iowas, Florida Atlantics that anyone can reasonably get behind and cheer for when it gets to the later stages of the women’s tournament. Those teams that fans gravitate toward and cheer for if their own team didn’t make it or got upset early in the tournament. It’s pretty much set in stone that UConn, South Carolina, LSU, etc. are most likely going to win it, so if you aren’t a fan of those teams, why tune in (unless another Caitlin Clark comes along)? Granted, people still watch the men’s Elite Eight/Final Four games even if they don’t have a specific team they love participating, so that might be an unreasonable argument I’m making. But I wonder if it would help if there was a bit more parity (or at least a slight hope of a non-top 3 team making it late into the tournament).
I don’t think all of this is going to “ruin” college basketball, but I do think it’s going to negatively impact/change college basketball, even more than it already has so far. In some ways, fans will probably just shift allegiances more and more to the big teams they care about (in this region, Big 10 schools) and not get as emotionally invested in their local schools’ or alma maters’ seasons if they know it’ll be either a roster that will lose 3-4 key players each season or a portal slot machine where you hope the key pieces align but have no clue if the 5-6 transfers coming in will work out favorably.
Will this “kill” college basketball as a whole? No, almost undoubtedly it won’t. But I think it will negatively impact college basketball by creating a significantly bigger divide between the top 40-50 programs and the rest of the programs at all levels (mid-major, low-major, D2, etc.) to a degree that makes the latter less and less enjoyable each season.
Comment