Originally posted by Ram040506
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thoughts on RR SR1 after 5 weeks
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NewHaven Alum View Post
Personally, I read it many times and I also believe that poster meant for the first time ever and it was wrong.
"Bentley gets another game against St. Anselm (who they only beat 3-0 the first time)" Referring to their earlier meeting 2 weeks or so ago.
https://bentleyfalcons.com/sports/fo.../boxscore/6723
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ram040506 View Post
Well, you are still reading it wrong then.
"Bentley gets another game against St. Anselm (who they only beat 3-0 the first time)" Referring to their earlier meeting 2 weeks or so ago.
https://bentleyfalcons.com/sports/fo.../boxscore/6723
The original post was edited hours later. I think he's referring to the original post?
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
The original post was edited hours later. I think he's referring to the original post?“No matter how badly things get blown apart, we will always plant flowers again.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBigCat2192 View PostKU, SRU, and IUP all look good. One of these three will probably end up PSAC champ and a high seed.
Cal, ESU, and Shep have all taken losses that give them limited wiggle room. Shep and Cal might be able to get in with two losses because of their schedules. I don’t know if the same is true of ESU
Findlay is undefeated but I don’t believe they’ve played either Tiffin or Ashland yet.
Tiffin and Ashland are both 2-2 but each have a loss outside the region. Their record against regional opponents could end with only 1 loss.
The NE-10 is a mess. I believe all of their teams have at least 1 D2 loss and none of their top contenders have any marquee non-conference wins.
Charleston looks like a solid contender but the rest of the MEC is underwhelming. Could a 1-loss FSU miss out behind a 2-loss team from a tougher league? Too soon to tell but worth keeping in the back of your mind as those two play through their conference schedules.Cal U (Pa.) Class of 2014
Comment
-
Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post
SRU-IUP basically has that "play-in" game feel even though we're in Week 5. Kutztown's only real "test" the rest of the way might be their Oct. 26 showdown against Shepherd, though we're not exactly seeing the high-powered Shepherd offense we're used to seeing. That said, their next two games - Bloomsburg and Lock Haven - have "trap game" written all over them. The way things are going in this region, the PSAC champ may end up as top-seed (almost by default).
Findlay has played Truman, Wayne State (Mich.), Lake Erie and Hillsdale... Findlay hosts Ashland next week and closes the season at Tiffin on Nov. 16.
What actually hurts Ashland is that their loss to Ferris is "in-region" because of Northwood and Hillsdale being in the GMAC and SR1... hence, Michigan opponents are considered in-region, even if the team is part of the GLIAC and SR3. Tiffin's loss was to Lenoir-Rhyne is also "in-region" because UNC-Pembroke is part of SR1 via the MEC, hence Lenoir-Rhyne is considered "in-region" because the state of North Carolina is part of SR1, even though L-R and the SAC are in SR2. Now, that could've changed over the past few years, but those losses will bite Ashland and Tiffin right now, never mind down the road.
2. I forgot about in-region but not really rule. It’s never been an issue for BU since they’ve always been either firmly in or firmly out so it slipped my mind. Ashland v Ferris State I can get since Michigan borders Ohio but Tiffin is getting screwed by technicality in my eyes.“No matter how badly things get blown apart, we will always plant flowers again.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBigCat2192 View Post
1. I don’t really see BU as a trap game for Kutztown. BU has two one score wins against uninspiring opponents. That 3-1 record is about as hollow as the average MEC team.
2. I forgot about in-region but not really rule. It’s never been an issue for BU since they’ve always been either firmly in or firmly out so it slipped my mind. Ashland v Ferris State I can get since Michigan borders Ohio but Tiffin is getting screwed by technicality in my eyes.Cal U (Pa.) Class of 2014
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ram040506 View PostMy early prediction for how it shakes out ultimately:
1. Kutztown 11-0 beats Rock in the PSAC championship and takes the overall top seed.
2. Charleston 11-0 Their win against California helps with SOS and they go undefeated and MEC champs
3. Slippery Rock 10-1 They win the PSAC west but lose to Kutztown in the PSAC title game.
4. New Haven 9-1 Runs the table and wins the NE10
5. IUP 10-1- I see them losing to Rock but beating California.
6. East Stroudsburg 10-1- Only loss to Kutztown
7. Ashland 9-2 runs the table in the GMAC and gets EA over Frostburg State
8. Frostburg State 10-1 - SOS is terrible, they get bumped for the GMAC champ.
5-6-7 are not actually ranked in the RR so first round matchups end up like this:
ESU @ Charleston
Ashland @ Slippery Rock
IUP @ New Haven
Kutztown gets the bye.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boro33 View Post
No Shep?
Kutztown is probably a loss, and the Rams can certainly win every other game on their schedule. ESU for whatever reason has not played well against the Rams since Shepherd joined the PSAC, so hopefully that continues. Just too much inconsistency to bank on them being one of the 7 at this point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WarriorVoice View Post"They had some really good crowds behind them at Hubert Jack in the losses"
FYI, The Jack holds 3,500. It's one of the smallest grandstands in the conference. I wonder if Coach Mulrooney will push for an expansion.
The locals were geared up the night of the IUP visit. For a D2 game it was an energetic bunch. And, 4,500 at Lock Haven ... compared to what they are used to ... probably felt like 20,000.
Our crowds, league-wide, pretty much suck so it doesn't take much noise to make an impact.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
He'll be long gone before they could put in some more bleachers. They announced about 4,500 at the IUP game. As you said the bleacher is fairly small. They had people around the fences, up above standing behind the bleachers and then also seated on the grass behind the one end zone (on the walking path back down to civilization).
The locals were geared up the night of the IUP visit. For a D2 game it was an energetic bunch. And, 4,500 at Lock Haven ... compared to what they are used to ... probably felt like 20,000.
Our crowds, league-wide, pretty much suck so it doesn't take much noise to make an impact.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
An away side would ruin the view. That's a strategic design, even if the size makes sense.
Somebody was telling me that when I was there ... about ruining the view. I don't know. If they went 12 rows up ... I guess it would to an extent. But, do they want a football stadium or a photo op? The view is cool. No doubt. But ... bleachers on one side really has a high school vibe.
BTW, it may be possible to put them in over there but perhaps not. That is a steep cliff that transitions the football stadium down to the softball field. They could build enough structure, obviously, to support them but by doing so it would likely hinder the field below. That is one interesting set up there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
Somebody was telling me that when I was there ... about ruining the view. I don't know. If they went 12 rows up ... I guess it would to an extent. But, do they want a football stadium or a photo op? The view is cool. No doubt. But ... bleachers on one side really has a high school vibe.
BTW, it may be possible to put them in over there but perhaps not. That is a steep cliff that transitions the football stadium down to the softball field. They could build enough structure, obviously, to support them but by doing so it would likely hinder the field below. That is one interesting set up there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WarriorVoice View Post
There's no real way to put stands on the visitor side because of the fields below. Is it a great view, but that shouldn't be the biggest appeal of your football program...
Views are important and not just there. Recall when Pittsburgh was building PNC Park and the view of the skyline was a critical part of the design. Later, when the Phillies were building Citizen's Bank Park they insisted on there being a view of the Center City skyline, although it is pretty distant and, arguably, not as eye-catching as Pittsburgh's.
I am sure some people at LHU are entertaining the idea of expansion. Maybe there can be workarounds like having a visitor's side that is split and still allows for a nice view. Or, expansion of the current side capacity. Build an elevated concession area that takes in the view.
On the other hand, anything done to the men's sports side at LHU will have to be equaled on the women's side. Several years ago, LHU got a significant funding from the state to rehab the old LHHS building (now part of their East Campus) into a state-of-the-art wrestling complex. It would have been literally a world-class facility, enabling them to hold more and bigger tournaments on both the HS and college levels, as well as being utilized to upgrade their camps. It would have also been home to the Mat-Town Wrestling Club. But at LH the women's side is very powerful and they saw it as unfair, of course, and they could make a legitimate argument that it was. So, I'm not sure how they use that building now but it's not for the wrestling facility. This was stalled even after the state funds were specifically earmarked for the wrestling facility. Who knows how it would play out now since LH has a great women's wrestling program in addition to the men's.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment