Originally posted by UISguy23
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New GVSU Master Plan Released
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by bigmrg74 View PostEast side stands are easily the best way to go to increase stadium capacity right now. Plus, I believe that in the past there's been plans of putting the visiting locker rooms over there either behind or under the seating there. Would help to prevent the issue of two teams having to cross each other when heading to the locker rooms. Its kinda shameful that guys can't just be cool about it, but its a passionate game, and well, preventing teams from crossing would do a lot in general in preventing issues.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlexTheHAMMER View Post
Comment
-
Just hoping they plan on being part of at least the D2 natty game for the first time in nearly 20 years. Is that in there somewhere? Don't want that SR1 power to come between that and their goals. If GVSU is a football power they should be able to compete for D2 championships the last 20 years. /bait
Comment
-
Originally posted by Turbonium View PostJust hoping they plan on being part of at least the D2 natty game for the first time in nearly 20 years. Is that in there somewhere? Don't want that SR1 power to come between that and their goals. If GVSU is a football power they should be able to compete for D2 championships the last 20 years. /bait
- 2 likes
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Redwing View Post
True... then look at MTU and NMU. Lake Superior isn't much better.
Tech and NMU are where they are and kinda have to roll with their best option. I'm with Kle...why would we CHOOSE to go to a format where our nearest conference or FCS foe would be five hours away? Why would we CHOOSE to spend craptons more $, get clobbered in all of our other sports, and make it so our fans travel less than they already do? We can CHOOSE to stay where we are and have half of our annual roadies be three hours or less. We can CHOOSE to stay where we are and have weekends like we are now where both golf teams are going to nationals, lacrosse is going to the Final Four, W's & M's T&F will undoubtedly go to nationals for the 20th+ straight year, and softball is rolling to yet another Super Regional. The vast majority of that sails away if we CHOOSE to want to travel like Tech and NMU do.
Can't for the life of me figure out why we would CHOOSE a more expensive option that provides less value to the University and our student-athletes. Just because some of our conference mates currently deal with tougher travel hardly means we should want that for ourselves when we would have make a conscious choice for it to be so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Irishlaker View Post
Apples and Oranges. We have choices/options...Tech, NMU, and LSSU, not so much.
Tech and NMU are where they are and kinda have to roll with their best option. I'm with Kle...why would we CHOOSE to go to a format where our nearest conference or FCS foe would be five hours away? Why would we CHOOSE to spend craptons more $, get clobbered in all of our other sports, and make it so our fans travel less than they already do? We can CHOOSE to stay where we are and have half of our annual roadies be three hours or less. We can CHOOSE to stay where we are and have weekends like we are now where both golf teams are going to nationals, lacrosse is going to the Final Four, W's & M's T&F will undoubtedly go to nationals for the 20th+ straight year, and softball is rolling to yet another Super Regional. The vast majority of that sails away if we CHOOSE to want to travel like Tech and NMU do.
Can't for the life of me figure out why we would CHOOSE a more expensive option that provides less value to the University and our student-athletes. Just because some of our conference mates currently deal with tougher travel hardly means we should want that for ourselves when we would have make a conscious choice for it to be so.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment