Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WT football

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: WT football

    Originally posted by ASUPops View Post
    $ is a factor. Recruiting is a factor. Proximity to DFW is a factor. Contract term is a factor. Staff support $ is a factor. Right now TAMUC is the place to be.
    If this is the case and I believe it is, then TAMUC and Tarleton can outspend everyone else in the Conference and are going to have a major advantage moving forward. My thinking was that WT had the same resources as these two.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: WT football

      Originally posted by ASUPops View Post
      $ is a factor. Recruiting is a factor. Proximity to DFW is a factor. Contract term is a factor. Staff support $ is a factor. Right now TAMUC is the place to be.
      All good points. If I were Hughes, I'd explore it, too.

      The one thing WT does that I've never understood, is the policy against giving any coach a multi-year contract. McBroom's philosophy is, if you're doing a good job and winning, you can coach at WT forever. Why then should a coach worry about his security? Bob Schneider coached women's BB for 25 years at WT. Rick Cooper men's BB for about the same number of years. Blaskowski with SB for 12-13 years. Tony Gravestone VB or over 10 years.

      The only downside might be in attracting a great coach who's used to working with a multi-year agreement. McBroom would say, "if he's worried about what happens if he fails, he's not our guy."

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: WT football

        Originally posted by BuffaloChip View Post
        All good points. If I were Hughes, I'd explore it, too.

        The one thing WT does that I've never understood, is the policy against giving any coach a multi-year contract. McBroom's philosophy is, if you're doing a good job and winning, you can coach at WT forever. Why then should a coach worry about his security? Bob Schneider coached women's BB for 25 years at WT. Rick Cooper men's BB for about the same number of years. Blaskowski with SB for 12-13 years. Tony Gravestone VB or over 10 years.

        The only downside might be in attracting a great coach who's used to working with a multi-year agreement. McBroom would say, "if he's worried about what happens if he fails, he's not our guy."
        Excellent point. I actually LOVE that approach.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: WT football

          I find it interesting Hughes would pursue the Commerce job. I'm also surprised WT isnt more competitive in the support staff and salaries of the football program. I just assumed that was a nonfactor. I do remember the coordinator from Sioux Falls being leery of the contract situation at WT and ultimately turned it down with no term guarantee

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: WT football

            I am surprised by Hughes pursuing the commerce job. I have not spoken to him as much as I did Don or Nesbitt but that is not the impression I received from him. The impression I got was that he was thankful to have WT give him a shot at being a head coach and was looking to return the favor with loyalty and wins. From what I understood no LSC head coach officially applied for the position at Commerce.

            From a career standpoint it does make sense though. He doesn't have to try and build at commerce like he does at WT, it's already built. He only has to maintain. As far as finances. I don't believe WT is that far behind Commerce or anyone in the LSC for that matter.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: WT football

              Originally posted by BuffTough View Post
              I am surprised by Hughes pursuing the commerce job. I have not spoken to him as much as I did Don or Nesbitt but that is not the impression I received from him. The impression I got was that he was thankful to have WT give him a shot at being a head coach and was looking to return the favor with loyalty and wins.

              From a career standpoint it does make sense though. He doesn't have to try and build at commerce like he does at WT, it's already built. He only has to maintain. As far as finances. I don't believe WT is that far behind Commerce or anyone in the LSC for that matter.
              Apparently you are if your HC is pursuing another Team in your conference.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: WT football

                Originally posted by Techster88 View Post
                If this is the case and I believe it is, then TAMUC and Tarleton can outspend everyone else in the Conference and are going to have a major advantage moving forward. My thinking was that WT had the same resources as these two.
                It was brought up earlier this year on the financial spending of all the teams. If I remember right Commerce spent the most followed by WT and then Tarleton. They were all within 100k of each other. I will see if I can find the old post.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: WT football

                  Originally posted by BuffTough View Post
                  It was brought up earlier this year on the financial spending of all the teams. If I remember right Commerce spent the most followed by WT and then Tarleton. They were all within 100k of each other. I will see if I can find the old post.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: WT football

                    Just see Chips post(s). He is the most "in the know" regarding WT sports as far as I can tell.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: WT football

                      So what are the perks?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: WT football

                        What kind of perks.

                        Seems like those things are fairly well defined by NCAA - tuition, books, meals, and rent - plus some travel expenses and any amenities that are available to the general student body.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: WT football

                          Originally posted by TexanFan View Post
                          So what are the perks?
                          Strippers and Cocaine

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: WT football

                            Originally posted by AngeloFan View Post
                            What kind of perks.

                            Seems like those things are fairly well defined by NCAA - tuition, books, meals, and rent - plus some travel expenses and any amenities that are available to the general student body.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: WT football

                              Originally posted by Casual_Observer View Post
                              Strippers and Cocaine
                              Perks? Aren't those staples at those two institutions? ;)

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: WT football

                                Nm.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X