OBUGrad, I should add that if the Reddies win, the issue will be about seeding, and that will also depend upon the results of the other key games in SR3.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GAC Postseason
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Armo Wood View PostHuh? What does hypothetically playing on a neutral field have to do with the RRs?
Yes, if Henderson wins they are in. Trust me, I'm sure that's the mindset. We're talking about a hypothetical scenario here on a message board, HSU isn't concerned with Lindenwood.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Inkblot View Post
How would the committee distinguish between three 10-1 GAC teams?
1) They could sort by road record. In that case, Ouachita would stay at the top of the three, because their only loss would be at home, while Harding and Henderson lost on the road. Harding would be ahead of Henderson because of H2H.
2) They used to have a criteria of record over last five games. If they bring that back, then Harding would be at the top of the GAC pile because of H2H with Henderson, and of course Henderson having H2H and Ouachita losing in the last game (4-1 record vs. 5-0 records for Harding and Henderson) would be last.
The committee could use some other criteria they feel would be representative, but outside of the dartboard method, nothing comes to mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Armo Wood View Post
That's the million dollar question. There are a couple of ways they could look at it.
1) They could sort by road record. In that case, Ouachita would stay at the top of the three, because their only loss would be at home, while Harding and Henderson lost on the road. Harding would be ahead of Henderson because of H2H.
2) They used to have a criteria of record over last five games. If they bring that back, then Harding would be at the top of the GAC pile because of H2H with Henderson, and of course Henderson having H2H and Ouachita losing in the last game (4-1 record vs. 5-0 records for Harding and Henderson) would be last.
The committee could use some other criteria they feel would be representative, but outside of the dartboard method, nothing comes to mind.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment