Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Playoffs

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Playoffs

    Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
    If it wasn't a conference championship in a conference of 5, with Humboldt and Simon Fraser I could see the point.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Playoffs

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Playoffs

        I just want to wish my Texans and the Lions of ETSU the best of luck this weekend. I would feel sorry for MSU, but they have a fan by the name of Brad Cozart that makes it very difficult to care for anyone or anybody from WF.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Playoffs

          Originally posted by wisdomgymrat View Post
          I just want to wish my Texans and the Lions of ETSU the best of luck this weekend. I would feel sorry for MSU, but they have a fan by the name of Brad Cozart that makes it very difficult to care for anyone or anybody from WF.
          Yes, they like all schools have turds that make you dislike them. HOGSVVR loves Maskhole.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Playoffs

            So they're going to allow a team to compete in the playoffs over a superior team?

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Playoffs

              Originally posted by Turbonium View Post
              What's the best win Midwestern has?
              Good question.

              You could ask the same about Commerce.
              Was it their 1 point, 2OT win against the Hogs?
              Was it their 10 pt win over 1-8 William Jewell?
              Was it their 10 pt win over 5-6 ENeMaU?
              Was it their 62 pt drubbing over 2-9 LockHaven?
              Was it their 20-19 win over MSU because MSU's kicker can't kick a 30 yard FG?
              Was it the 48 pt drubbing over winless WNM?
              The 3 pt squeaker over UT Peanut Butter?
              or the 28 pt beating over 6-5 ASU who's HC was fired 5 days before?

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Playoffs

                Originally posted by '89HOG View Post
                Good question.

                You could ask the same about Commerce.
                Was it their 1 point, 2OT win against the Hogs?
                Was it their 10 pt win over 1-8 William Jewell?
                Was it their 10 pt win over 5-6 ENeMaU?
                Was it their 62 pt drubbing over 2-9 LockHaven?
                Was it their 20-19 win over MSU because MSU's kicker can't kick a 30 yard FG?
                Was it the 48 pt drubbing over winless WNM?
                The 3 pt squeaker over UT Peanut Butter?
                or the 28 pt beating over 6-5 ASU who's HC was fired 5 days before?
                Its the bolded part that got us in, and properly so.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Playoffs

                  The committee showed they didn't care about the L's as much as the W's
                  If you look at Midwestern's 2 Losses to Commerce and Tarleton. Midwestern lost those games by 1 point each.
                  Azusa on the other hand loss 2 Div II games by 14 + points

                  I believe the Committee believed that Azusa was the better team based on the WT Game. WT was the only common opponent that Both Azusa and Midwestern faced .
                  WT: 7
                  Azusa: 17 (Home)

                  WT: 23
                  Midwestern: 24 (OT) (Home)

                  WT was beat by Tarleton by 37 points and Commerce by 25 points.

                  On paper WT should have lost by at least 21 but...Midwestern had a bad game, WT came out looking to spoil someone party.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Playoffs

                    Originally posted by AmaKnight View Post
                    The committee showed they didn't care about the L's as much as the W's
                    If you look at Midwestern's 2 Losses to Commerce and Tarleton. Midwestern lost those games by 1 point each.
                    Azusa on the other hand loss 2 Div II games by 14 + points

                    I believe the Committee believed that Azusa was the better team based on the WT Game. WT was the only common opponent that Both Azusa and Midwestern faced .
                    WT: 7
                    Azusa: 17 (Home)

                    WT: 23
                    Midwestern: 24 (OT) (Home)

                    WT was beat by Tarleton by 37 points and Commerce by 25 points.

                    On paper WT should have lost by at least 21 but...Midwestern had a bad game, WT came out looking to spoil someone party.
                    I hope you are wrong, because comparing common opponent results is rarely useful.

                    WT came to PLAY on Saturday. It was good to see, but they play better against good teams. Hughes needs to figure out a way to motivate them against the lesser teams, or in ENMU's case, teams with poorer records.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Playoffs

                      Originally posted by Techster88 View Post
                      Yes, they like all schools have turds that make you dislike them. HOGSVVR loves Maskhole.
                      WTF?

                      I am trying my best to trying to be a good boy around this Christmas Season, so that Santa doesn't fauck me over as he has for the last 30 or so years. (It seems like my Javelinas been sucking for that long.) Well anyways---fauck Maskill, he had it coming!

                      https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Hp4ho9CiQvo

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Playoffs

                        Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
                        So they're going to allow a team to compete in the playoffs over a superior team?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Playoffs

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Playoffs

                            Fair point. I don't think they should've gotten in. Our boys will knock them out. Frankly, I'd prefer Commerce

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Playoffs

                              Originally posted by Vulpes88 View Post
                              Fair point. I don't think they should've gotten in. Our boys will knock them out. Frankly, I'd prefer Commerce
                              And We'd prefer Stephenville to Duluth freakin Canada, but it is what it is. See you in 2 weeks.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Playoffs

                                Originally posted by JakeTAMUC View Post
                                See you in 2 weeks.
                                For the betterment of the LSC, I hope so.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X