Originally posted by Bart
View Post
I see it as a perfectly sensible, even inevitable, progression given the PASSHE plan, overall. Furthermore, I don't see Bloom losing identity or status with it. Bloom might even gain status as a result if it is seen as being the dominant player among the three.
In this arrangement, Mansfield is losing a lot, LH is next, and Bloom so far isn't losing much.
But this kind of parochialism can't get in the way of the plan. Territorialism will only hold the system back.
In fact, this isn't anything new. The schools have been tied together as one system since 1983. When PASSHE was formed, it was IUP that lost a degree of distinctiveness. The rest did not, including Bloom. In fact, the rest of the system gained. We have lived with that for 37 years. I thought then, and I still do now, that IUP should have gone the state-related route. Of course, they didn't.
At this point, I think we have to look at what is good for the system as a whole. None of the schools can stand on their own, with the exception of perhaps West Chester.
They are making a big deal of the % enrollment declines for LHU and Mansfield. However, these are small numbers. The bigger problems are at bigger schools that have lost large percentages, albeit not as large percentage-wise as LHU and Mansfield. Think IUP, Ship, Cal, Boro, and Clarion.
The eastern schools like Bloom, Ville, and ESU may have only lost ~ 15% of enrollment, as compared to 25-35% elsewhere; however, they are not in good shape. It's likely another 15% is coming.
BTW, Kutztown's situation is similar to the western schools. Not sure what happened there.
Leave a comment: