Had a good conversation today with someone who is a senior manager at a PASSHE school. They told me the athletics ROI is the key: expect these schools to kill any sport that doesn't bring in more tuition $ than its operating expenses. Also expect to see coaching staffs get trimmed using a formula using roster spots. Agreed with me that accreditation will require a main campus, people still need to be "in charge" when in person operations resume, and that relying on online instruction for the model is walking away from the high school market.
This plan could make sense if the entire system was being consolidated into one university each in the east and west. IUP the west hub and West Chester the east hub. But that's not the plan so it doesn't make as much sense without some sort of research or precedent to lead the change.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PASSHE Institutions Merging
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View PostThe system redesign document regarding athletics.
https://www.passhe.edu/SystemRedesig...p%20Charge.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
"If you don't like it ... learn to love it."
-- Ric Flair
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SRU 88 View Post
A lot of questions are asked in the document; and neither side (PASSHE Administrators nor Alums of the 3 schools) are going to like the answers,
-- Ric Flair
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View PostThe system redesign document regarding athletics.
https://www.passhe.edu/SystemRedesig...p%20Charge.pdf
A lot of questions are asked in the document; and neither side (PASSHE Administrators nor Alums of the 3 schools) are going to like the answers,
Leave a comment:
-
The system redesign document regarding athletics.
https://www.passhe.edu/SystemRedesig...p%20Charge.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
I can empathize with that. In fact, I think just about everybody feels powerless.
The one phrase of yours I would question is "capacity to grow." Realistically, I don't think any of these western schools have the capacity to grow in terms of enrollment. I look at this western triad as a coordinated way of managing the decline. Or perhaps the obsolescence (gasp).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
I can empathize with that. In fact, I think just about everybody feels powerless.
The one phrase of yours I would question is "capacity to grow." Realistically, I don't think any of these western schools have the capacity to grow in terms of enrollment. I look at this western triad as a coordinated way of managing the decline. Or perhaps the obsolescence (gasp).
The problem with online is that nearly every University is now an online school because of covid too. So saying that you can recruit within the US to grow kind of doesn't sound as realistic.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
I've been told that model is off the table. I think each could theoretically make a case for being the hub: most capacity to grow, centrality, or proximity to a metro area.
In all honesty, I can't figure out anything. What seems to make the most sense isn't being chosen. My only prediction is how they'll attempt to reach the 25% savings and it won't appeal to prospective students. There's nothing I can do as a concerned alumnus other than sit back and watch.
The one phrase of yours I would question is "capacity to grow." Realistically, I don't think any of these western schools have the capacity to grow in terms of enrollment. I look at this western triad as a coordinated way of managing the decline. Or perhaps the obsolescence (gasp).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
Doesn't the designation of a system leader who is the President of one of the universities and will remain seated at that institution sort of make that campus the main campus and relegate the other campuses to effective branch campuses?
In all honesty, I can't figure out anything. What seems to make the most sense isn't being chosen. My only prediction is how they'll attempt to reach the 25% savings and it won't appeal to prospective students. There's nothing I can do as a concerned alumnus other than sit back and watch.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
I'm not sure why she was chosen. I know very little about her. I was on the search committee for the Edinboro president and just Saturday was in a zoom meeting he attended. I've never felt he was anything less than honest. He was more experienced than her. Cal's president had already expressed intentions to retire before the merger, so it was between Pehrsson at Clarion and Huang at Edinboro. When Pehrsson was selected, Huang took an interview and got the job. Bigger school but same challenges.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
Question: For the other "triad" they had somehow named the beleaguered Bloom President over the dynamic LHU President to be the chief guy. Had they made a similar move naming Clarion's President to head up the western triad? Is that why the Boro Prez moved on and the Cal U Prez retired?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
The question I have is how are they going to increase the size of the student "pie" in PA? PASSHE's demographic is HS students that live in PA. By all accounts, this number has and will continue to go down for the forseable future. Will reducting tuition by 25% at these six schools result in them getting a bigger piece of that pie? I would say yes...but will that bigger share come at the expense of other PASSHE schools or will it come from an increase in HS students that do not now go to college? The former is just moving the enrollment problem from one place to another.
That could happen and it would accelerate the decline.
You're points are great. If you don't get new kids going to college that wouldn't have went before, you may create a bigger problem.
Now, IF retention improves that's a big thing. Student retention rates at these schools hasn't been great. But, then again...when you share Admin services you have less staff on campuses. Will that help retention? Probably not. Will it help quality of experience? Probably not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WarriorVoice View Post
Schools will be SHARING administrative services, which certainly seems like an easy way to reduce costs. Shrinking enrollments would suggest that the need for the current amount of administrators has declined as well...As for sports, you play for the campus you earn your degree from, just like now...
And for like Admissions, Bursar, Financial Aid...schools need an on campus presence for those services as they are student facing.
Now you likely don't need 3 Presidents, 3 VP of Communication, etc. So at the upper management level there can be savings.
Sharing services will save some money, but not tens of millions of dollars a year...so the rest will have to come from faculty.
Leave a comment:
Ad3
Collapse
Leave a comment: