Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PSAC WEST

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IUPHawks24
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    Bazzoli is a very not liked coach in the PSAC lol and by any other teams they played. He's rides the refs like Fee did, but is a little less charismatic. He also chirps at the other coaches when they ride a ref for something he disagrees with.

    I know some fans gave been rubbed the wrong way by him, but in general he's liked. He's very direct and keeps to a schedule.. putting it nicely
    What do you mean by keeps to a schedule?

    Doesn't make time for fans and boosters?

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).
    Bazzoli is a very not liked coach in the PSAC lol and by any other teams they played. He's rides the refs like Fee did, but is a little less charismatic. He also chirps at the other coaches when they ride a ref for something he disagrees with.

    I know some fans gave been rubbed the wrong way by him, but in general he's liked. He's very direct and keeps to a schedule.. putting it nicely

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
    Boro first season sweep of IUP since 2007-08.
    They've been a fun surprise this year!

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Boro first season sweep of IUP since 2007-08.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    IUP on upset alert to Boro

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Thank God GU pulled that one out in the 2nd half. Clarion didn't play well at any point, Gannon just sucked for the first 8 mins of the 2nd half lol

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Not exactly a must-see-TV lineup across the league tonight, but there are some intriguing men's games. The women's games may (likely) all be slaughters.


    Gannon at Slippery Rock - On paper, this is a total mismatch. Gannon got healthier, and has rediscovered its stride. The Rock has lost 3 straight (and 4 of its past 5). Add to it, the Knights won the first meeting, 90-64. Making matters worse, the SRU lineup card changes by the game. Who is playing? Who isn't? Why aren't they? Lots of questions. Morrow Field House has seen its share of odd occurrences over the decades. SRU has pulled some big upsets in there. They'd need some extreme Morrow Magic for that to happen tonight. Knights -12.5

    IUP at Pitt-Johnstown - IUP freshman point guard Kymani Merraro experienced his first UPJ game last month. Afterward, he said something along the lines of it being an odd experience because the UPJ bench was calling out all of IUP's plays the entire game. IUP won the game (barely). On this young IUP team, it's very likely UPJ may actually know the IUP system better than Joe's current rotation does. Joe doesn't disguise anything. The first meeting saw IUP storm out to a huge lead (20-range) -- and hang on for dear life. UPJ is better than its record. IUP is about right on par with its .500 mark. However, IUP hasn't won a West road game this season. The Hawks likely won't tonight, either. The Dirty J gets hopping for Joe's visit. The Mountain Cats play to well in Johnstown for this up-and-down IUP team to handle. UPJ -5.5

    California at Clarion - The Vulcans are red hot all the sudden - winners of their past 4 games. Clarion is as sporadic as a team can get. Cal beat them up in Angelo's Dome last month. However, the Golden Eagles are 6-3 inside Tippin this season. Cal is 8-3 in the empty dome, but just 5-7 outside it. Tonight will be closer than the January meeting. Clarion, however, has trouble finishing games. Danny's team never stops coming at you. Vulcans -8.5

    Leave a comment:


  • Bballfan
    replied
    The race on the women's side it wild. Basically 1 of those top 4 teams are going to prevail, but they will keep beating up on each other the rest of the regular season. Regardless, the conference tournament is ultimately going to decide who hosts the Atlantic region. The strength of schedule of those 4 teams are very impressive too.

    Seton Hill 20-3 0.560
    Edinboro 18-4 0.547
    IUP 15-4 0.553
    Gannon 20-5 0.527

    Interestingly enough, all but Seton Hill lost to a GMAC school. Edinboro lost to Findlay. IUP lost to Ashland. Gannon lost to Ohio Dominican. Now losses to Ashland and Findlay are not bad losses. The Gannon loss to Ohio Dominican (a team not even in the top 8 of the GMAC) was bad. Conversely Seton Hill defeating Malone is one of their best wins of the year.

    Gannon has what I would say is the easiest finish to the season, but has to make up a two loss deficit. The other three have brutal schedules to finish though. Crazy as it sounds, I think Gannon still pulls it out

    Leave a comment:


  • Ship69
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).
    I agree that they tend to get it right most of the time. Part of being an adult is the ability to acknowledge the achievements of people you don't particularly like. Bob Knight was a classic example. He was an ass much of the time as a person, but he was a helluva basketball coach.

    Leave a comment:


  • gman16506
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    I didn't discover this site until just a few years ago and have posted regularly, even during the 3-23 season.
    Don't sweat it! There is zero correlation between number of posts on this Board and your level of loyalty to the team of your choice. I personally visit this site almost daily, but very seldom post for a variety of reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    UPDATED WOMEN'S STANDINGS

    -
    TEAM PSAC OVERALL STREAK
    Seton Hill 14-2 20-3 W1
    Edinboro 14-2 19-4 W5
    Gannon 12-4 20-5 L2
    IUP 11-3 16-4 W1
    California 9-7 13-10 W2
    Clarion 7-9 13-11 L1
    Slippery Rock 4-11 7-14 L6
    Pitt-Johnstown 0-15 2-20 L9

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    UPDATED MEN'S STANDINGS

    -
    TEAM PSAC OVERALL STREAK
    Gannon* 13-3 18-6 W2
    California 9-7 14-10 W4
    Edinboro 9-7 13-10 W1
    Slippery Rock 7-8 11-12 L3
    Seton Hill 7-9 14-10 W1
    IUP 6-8 11-11 L1
    Pitt-Johnstown 6-9 10-12 L2
    Clarion 6-10 11-11 L1

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigCat2192
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).
    The real question is whether either guy tests the portal waters after a successful freshman season. My guess would be no since Prosser might be a system player (not saying he definitely is but it’s hard to tell if a guy is a true talent or system talent in one year) and Merraro might be “too small” for D1 ball if his listed height/weight are accurate but the possibility always exists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    Justin is a great person in general and will keep Boro on the up for as long as he's there.
    I agree. I've only met him in passing but people seem to enjoy him. Great recruiter. Hopefully he can keep that up and no less than maintain his fundraising levels. This spring Edinboro will look to hire someone to consult on a full renovation or replacement of McComb. If Jennings sticks around for that completion, watch out.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by WarriorVoice View Post

    There's an eye test too. Coaches watch plenty of film, and see these guys twice a year. It's not just based on stats, and to think that way is very short-sighted...

    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X