Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PSAC WEST

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ship69
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).
    I agree that they tend to get it right most of the time. Part of being an adult is the ability to acknowledge the achievements of people you don't particularly like. Bob Knight was a classic example. He was an ass much of the time as a person, but he was a helluva basketball coach.

    Leave a comment:


  • gman16506
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    I didn't discover this site until just a few years ago and have posted regularly, even during the 3-23 season.
    Don't sweat it! There is zero correlation between number of posts on this Board and your level of loyalty to the team of your choice. I personally visit this site almost daily, but very seldom post for a variety of reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    UPDATED WOMEN'S STANDINGS

    -
    TEAM PSAC OVERALL STREAK
    Seton Hill 14-2 20-3 W1
    Edinboro 14-2 19-4 W5
    Gannon 12-4 20-5 L2
    IUP 11-3 16-4 W1
    California 9-7 13-10 W2
    Clarion 7-9 13-11 L1
    Slippery Rock 4-11 7-14 L6
    Pitt-Johnstown 0-15 2-20 L9

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    UPDATED MEN'S STANDINGS

    -
    TEAM PSAC OVERALL STREAK
    Gannon* 13-3 18-6 W2
    California 9-7 14-10 W4
    Edinboro 9-7 13-10 W1
    Slippery Rock 7-8 11-12 L3
    Seton Hill 7-9 14-10 W1
    IUP 6-8 11-11 L1
    Pitt-Johnstown 6-9 10-12 L2
    Clarion 6-10 11-11 L1

    Leave a comment:


  • TheBigCat2192
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).
    The real question is whether either guy tests the portal waters after a successful freshman season. My guess would be no since Prosser might be a system player (not saying he definitely is but it’s hard to tell if a guy is a true talent or system talent in one year) and Merraro might be “too small” for D1 ball if his listed height/weight are accurate but the possibility always exists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    Justin is a great person in general and will keep Boro on the up for as long as he's there.
    I agree. I've only met him in passing but people seem to enjoy him. Great recruiter. Hopefully he can keep that up and no less than maintain his fundraising levels. This spring Edinboro will look to hire someone to consult on a full renovation or replacement of McComb. If Jennings sticks around for that completion, watch out.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by WarriorVoice View Post

    There's an eye test too. Coaches watch plenty of film, and see these guys twice a year. It's not just based on stats, and to think that way is very short-sighted...

    No doubt.

    The other key item here is the 'human' vote. They don't all like one another. From what I've heard, GU's new coach isn't exactly popular among the West coaches. Of course, Joe isn't, either.

    What I'm getting at is these awards can often result in some animosity voting.

    Regardless, long way to go.

    Historically, they do tend to get them right (usually).

    Both of the above-mentioned players are worthy (as of now).

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    It's been a while since the Boro has been decent. Crap athletic fundraising and a dead fan culture don't help. Doesn't help that when I was a student Boro was the class of the PSAC West. Those Greg Walkavich and Gary Edwards games were great theater. I do miss those days.
    Justin is a great person in general and will keep Boro on the up for as long as he's there.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPalum View Post

    No, you have that all wrong! We come to this board through thick and thin since it was created. We don't go MIA during the bad times like all of you! Gannon fans were nothing but crickets towards the end of Reilly and Jefferson eras and now that they are winning again, here you are.
    I didn't discover this site until just a few years ago and have posted regularly, even during the 3-23 season.

    Leave a comment:


  • WarriorVoice
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    I don't think that will be taken into consideration. They'll look at stats and record. Merrero is "carrying" a below 500 team. Prosser is 3rd leading scorer on the top team.

    I wouldn't be surprised if Merrero gets it, but it'll be close either way.
    There's an eye test too. Coaches watch plenty of film, and see these guys twice a year. It's not just based on stats, and to think that way is very short-sighted...

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    Why shouldn't he? Your team does well, you let people know.
    No, you have that all wrong! We come to this board through thick and thin since it was created. We don't go MIA during the bad times like all of you! Gannon fans were nothing but crickets towards the end of Reilly and Jefferson eras and now that they are winning again, here you are.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPalum View Post

    Someone is getting cocky because the Boro is winning a few games this year.
    Why shouldn't he? Your team does well, you let people know.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPalum View Post

    Look at the two teams and their styles and players they are surrounded by. It's not even close that Merraro is the rookie of the year! He's carrying his team, Prosser is not and doesn't have to.
    I don't think that will be taken into consideration. They'll look at stats and record. Merrero is "carrying" a below 500 team. Prosser is 3rd leading scorer on the top team.

    I wouldn't be surprised if Merrero gets it, but it'll be close either way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPalum View Post

    Someone is getting cocky because the Boro is winning a few games this year.
    It's been a while since the Boro has been decent. Crap athletic fundraising and a dead fan culture don't help. Doesn't help that when I was a student Boro was the class of the PSAC West. Those Greg Walkavich and Gary Edwards games were great theater. I do miss those days.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by gman16506 View Post

    Edge to Prosser for starting on a team that will win the West??? Does that influence the post-season award voting? Don't know.
    I believe the coaches vote on it. If I'm a coach I vote Merraro. He sticks out on the IUP team, Prosser does not! It's easy to average the numbers Prosser does in the style Gannon uses. Gannon averages over 90 points a game vs 70 for IUP. Merraro's numbers are more significant.

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X