Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PASSHE Institutions Merging
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
There was some study, I believe before the current Chancellor got here that suggested merging or affiliating with a Penn State/Pitt/Temple or similar.Last edited by complaint_hopeful; 02-15-2021, 02:29 PM.
-
Plus, you have the SNHU's that can serve the market too...and have agreements with the Community Colleges. So it's not like it's just residential schools.Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
It's not like having several factories that serve the same market. There you can lop off excess capacity to fix the problem, except for some transportation considerations. Each school has it's own market, albeit overlapping to some extent. It has been shown how much it will cost to close schools, also.
Ultimately, the market will dictate the future of these schools. If after the first round of changes are made schools continue to lose enrollment or stay insolvent, further changes will be required. If that happens (and few people think it won't) schools may close or be repurposed. The slow demise of the schools will enable the constituent groups of the schools and the local area and local economy to absorb the loss in a less painful way. That's what I see on a macro level.
The pandemic has shown that basically any school can be an online school. But, not everyone can do it well.
Comment
-
It looks like other states have schools merging or talking or merging:
University Merger Talks On The Rise (forbes.com)
Comment
-
Seems that there are three "types" of 4 year colleges in PA. 1. Schools with a big name (Penn State, Pitt and I guess Temple). These schools use that name to charge higher tuition and are able to bring in a very large number of students. 2. Privates that "sell" their academic superiority/exclusivity. They bring in students looking for higher academics and/or the snob appeal of an "exclusive" college. 3. Schools that compete by being the lowest priced and least exclusive in town. They are like a volume car dealer, you get the best price but none of the frills (big name, academic reputation, snob appeal). Id put the PASSHE in the last category. Problem is that not as many people are buying cars anymore. Also the dealership seems to have forgotten its business model and are trying to compete with the 1's and 2's.
Comment
-
Yep. And the decreased state funding made the PASSHE price creep higher and higher to the point that students looking to go there deem it a better value to just pay a little more to go to one of the other schools.Originally posted by boatcapt View PostSeems that there are three "types" of 4 year colleges in PA. 1. Schools with a big name (Penn State, Pitt and I guess Temple). These schools use that name to charge higher tuition and are able to bring in a very large number of students. 2. Privates that "sell" their academic superiority/exclusivity. They bring in students looking for higher academics and/or the snob appeal of an "exclusive" college. 3. Schools that compete by being the lowest priced and least exclusive in town. They are like a volume car dealer, you get the best price but none of the frills (big name, academic reputation, snob appeal). Id put the PASSHE in the last category. Problem is that not as many people are buying cars anymore. Also the dealership seems to have forgotten its business model and are trying to compete with the 1's and 2's.
Layer on top of that competition from the SNHU's of the world that can provide online classes anywhere...and you have a hyper competitive market.
So what do you do? Do you work on trying to get your quality/brand image better? Do you work on cutting costs more? It's really probably the toughest market spot to be in.
Comment
-
That's not even mentioning the elite Carnegie Mellon level.Originally posted by boatcapt View PostSeems that there are three "types" of 4 year colleges in PA. 1. Schools with a big name (Penn State, Pitt and I guess Temple). These schools use that name to charge higher tuition and are able to bring in a very large number of students. 2. Privates that "sell" their academic superiority/exclusivity. They bring in students looking for higher academics and/or the snob appeal of an "exclusive" college. 3. Schools that compete by being the lowest priced and least exclusive in town. They are like a volume car dealer, you get the best price but none of the frills (big name, academic reputation, snob appeal). Id put the PASSHE in the last category. Problem is that not as many people are buying cars anymore. Also the dealership seems to have forgotten its business model and are trying to compete with the 1's and 2's.
Comment
-
A good reason to fight against the merger plan. If a university can keep it's name and athletic programs, they should be able to keep the money they raised.Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
That really is excellent. But how are you going to justify keeping that $60 million at the Bloomsburg campus?
Comment
-
My understanding is that just like with other functions, back-end operations for alumni relations & fundraising will be pooled (database management, prospect research, estate giving, etc) but Bloom will ask Bloom alumni for money for Bloom purposes. Endowments are managed differently at each school. The Edinboro group I'm affiliated with holds roughly $1.5 million in endowed funds for Edinboro. Since we're a separate 501c3 non-profit that money's not going anywhere. There would be some legal work to combine foundations.Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
That really is excellent. But how are you going to justify keeping that $60 million at the Bloomsburg campus?
Comment
-
I would think they'd let them keep it as alumni donate to specific schools. If they thought the money went elsewhere, they'd likely not give. Which gets into a lot of the discussions we're having.Originally posted by Bart View Post
A good reason to fight against the merger plan. If a university can keep it's name and athletic programs, they should be able to keep the money they raised.
Comment
-
A few months back I looked at the PASSHE approved budgets for the last 10ish years. Only once over the time frame was the budget cut. As I recall the years were evenly divided between the same budget the year before and a budget increase.Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
Yep. And the decreased state funding made the PASSHE price creep higher and higher to the point that students looking to go there deem it a better value to just pay a little more to go to one of the other schools.
Layer on top of that competition from the SNHU's of the world that can provide online classes anywhere...and you have a hyper competitive market.
So what do you do? Do you work on trying to get your quality/brand image better? Do you work on cutting costs more? It's really probably the toughest market spot to be in.
PASSHE is in a tough place...They can't really compete with the name universities and can't really compete on a precieved quality stand point.
Comment
-
Can you provide a source for that budget info? What I remember is that Corbett made drastic cuts in his early years. After that, if it stayed the same it was still a cut. Under the Wolf administration, the budget has rebounded somewhat.Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
A few months back I looked at the PASSHE approved budgets for the last 10ish years. Only once over the time frame was the budget cut. As I recall the years were evenly divided between the same budget the year before and a budget increase.
.
Comment
-
The foundation is separate from the university and has it's own nonprofit status with the aim to help Bloomsburg. Since it is an independent, private,non-profit organization, they should be able to protect the assets from poachers. Plus all funds are distributed per the donor request.Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
Have the big mahoff's figured this out yet?
Comment
-
Big problem is that Harrisburg signs system-wide labor contracts that bring annual cost increases that surpass any funding increases from the state. Throw in demographic-led enrollment losses and you've got a big problem. Penn State and Pitt have so much to throw around they've been bailing out their failing branch campuses for years. I believe only 2 or 3 Penn State campuses operate in the black and no Pitt branches but Bradford and Johnstown were close. Don't quote me on that - their finances aren't public like PASSHE.Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
A few months back I looked at the PASSHE approved budgets for the last 10ish years. Only once over the time frame was the budget cut. As I recall the years were evenly divided between the same budget the year before and a budget increase.
PASSHE is in a tough place...They can't really compete with the name universities and can't really compete on a precieved quality stand point.
The argument for state funding of colleges & tech schools has been lost. Its obvious because you have politicians who repeat the Heritage Center's cliche "why are my tax dollars paying for the education of somebody else's kid?" The answer is pretty simple - you're more likely to earn more over your lifetime with some sort of post-secondary education. Even a college dropout usually earns more than a high school graduate without any sort of training. More income equals more tax revenue. We all win.
There's going to be a major reckoning in a few decades as the population plummets and the tax revenue can't come near to paying for the government infrastructure built up between the 50s and 80s. Not just higher ed but the parks/forest system, state hospitals, state prisons, massive state police force, etc. Plus the full-time state legislature.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment