Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PSAC WEST

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post

    You pretty much took the words right out of my mouth. I can't help but think that it's time for the PSAC to ditch the divisions bit and follow the lead of, well, pretty much every Power Five basketball conference and get rid of divisions (each Big 12 team plays home-and-home, though that ends next season with the addition of four schools; ACC, SEC, B1G play 3-4 set opponents home-and-home then everyone else once; PAC-12 teams play nine home-and-home sets with single games against the remaining two schools).

    When the PSAC originally expanded to 18 teams, there was talk for going to a three-division format with home-and-home divisional games (10) and single games against the other two divisions (6 games x 2 divisions = 12) to keep the 22 game format in place. Unfortunately, we're stuck with the current scheme for god knows how long, but it's long overdue for an overhaul, even if the coaches have to buy into it kicking and screaming.

    You can keep the three-division scheme, but as "pods" rather than fixed divisions:

    West: Cal, Edinboro, Gannon, Mercyhurst, Seton Hill, Slippery Rock
    Central-ish: Clarion, IUP, Lock Haven, Mansfield, Shepherd, UPJ
    East: Bloomsburg, East Stroudsburg, Kutztown, Millersville, Shippensburg, West Chester

    Use the same 10-6-6 format as proposed in the three-division format and put everyone in a single division, take the 12 best teams overall and seed the damn thing. This way, the 7th best team in the West wouldn't be left out of the playoffs in favor of a dreadful 6th seed from the East. That way, an East team whose PSAC record would place them third in the West wouldn't host while a deserving top seed from the West misses out on hosting rights for the semis and finals (not that it bothered IUP much when they'd win the PSAC in an East gym in the past, but still...)

    And, yes, I'm sick of seeing the "third-time" showdowns in the early rounds. Seems way too bland and predictable at times.
    The 'third time' games can be entertaining but usually they are hard to watch. There's no surprises. When a team calls a play and the other team instantly calls the counter, it can lead to some boring basketball. Playing each other that close also leads to chippy play, scuffles, etc.

    And, too often, the third game is shortly after the second game. UPJ and SRU played yesterday and will play tomorrow. IUP and Cal will likely play again days later.

    The way the calendar falls, home court in the PSAC Finals weekend is overblown at most sites. The kids are gone (Spring Break).

    I went to the Final Four weekend at Ship several years ago and it was basically townies vs visiting townies in the stands. No students. Very tame. IUP probably had a louder crowd than Ship in the finals.

    What's really fun is the fourth game. IUP's had to play Mercyhurst four times and played Cal four times last year.


    All of that said, I think Mercyhurst is the betting favorite. Joe's coaching to get everybody their varsity letter. Gary may have the best team right now.
    Last edited by IUPbigINDIANS; 02-26-2023, 10:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • WarriorVoice
    replied
    Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post

    You pretty much took the words right out of my mouth. I can't help but think that it's time for the PSAC to ditch the divisions bit and follow the lead of, well, pretty much every Power Five basketball conference and get rid of divisions (each Big 12 team plays home-and-home, though that ends next season with the addition of four schools; ACC, SEC, B1G play 3-4 set opponents home-and-home then everyone else once; PAC-12 teams play nine home-and-home sets with single games against the remaining two schools).

    When the PSAC originally expanded to 18 teams, there was talk for going to a three-division format with home-and-home divisional games (10) and single games against the other two divisions (6 games x 2 divisions = 12) to keep the 22 game format in place. Unfortunately, we're stuck with the current scheme for god knows how long, but it's long overdue for an overhaul, even if the coaches have to buy into it kicking and screaming.

    You can keep the three-division scheme, but as "pods" rather than fixed divisions:

    West: Cal, Edinboro, Gannon, Mercyhurst, Seton Hill, Slippery Rock
    Central-ish: Clarion, IUP, Lock Haven, Mansfield, Shepherd, UPJ
    East: Bloomsburg, East Stroudsburg, Kutztown, Millersville, Shippensburg, West Chester

    Use the same 10-6-6 format as proposed in the three-division format and put everyone in a single division, take the 12 best teams overall and seed the damn thing. This way, the 7th best team in the West wouldn't be left out of the playoffs in favor of a dreadful 6th seed from the East. That way, an East team whose PSAC record would place them third in the West wouldn't host while a deserving top seed from the West misses out on hosting rights for the semis and finals (not that it bothered IUP much when they'd win the PSAC in an East gym in the past, but still...)

    And, yes, I'm sick of seeing the "third-time" showdowns in the early rounds. Seems way too bland and predictable at times.
    I think the conference will take a "wait and see" approach to changing the playoffs. There's no guarantee that all 18 schools will be in existence in coming years.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post
    Why is there a tournament? At most there should only be 4 teams left playing...the top two teams in each division.

    Then the top team overall with the best record should be hosting the whole thing.

    It should be IUP vs Walk On U in Game One
    It should be Shippensburg vs The Lake Show in Game Two.

    At IUP...
    As it turns out, IUP got the tougher draw than Mercyhurst. Cal is red hot and UPJ has fallen off a cliff


    Note: I'm assuming UPJ and Cal will both win at home Monday. I'd much rather play UPJ than Cal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ship69
    replied
    Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post

    You pretty much took the words right out of my mouth. I can't help but think that it's time for the PSAC to ditch the divisions bit and follow the lead of, well, pretty much every Power Five basketball conference and get rid of divisions (each Big 12 team plays home-and-home, though that ends next season with the addition of four schools; ACC, SEC, B1G play 3-4 set opponents home-and-home then everyone else once; PAC-12 teams play nine home-and-home sets with single games against the remaining two schools).

    When the PSAC originally expanded to 18 teams, there was talk for going to a three-division format with home-and-home divisional games (10) and single games against the other two divisions (6 games x 2 divisions = 12) to keep the 22 game format in place. Unfortunately, we're stuck with the current scheme for god knows how long, but it's long overdue for an overhaul, even if the coaches have to buy into it kicking and screaming.

    You can keep the three-division scheme, but as "pods" rather than fixed divisions:

    West: Cal, Edinboro, Gannon, Mercyhurst, Seton Hill, Slippery Rock
    Central-ish: Clarion, IUP, Lock Haven, Mansfield, Shepherd, UPJ
    East: Bloomsburg, East Stroudsburg, Kutztown, Millersville, Shippensburg, West Chester

    Use the same 10-6-6 format as proposed in the three-division format and put everyone in a single division, take the 12 best teams overall and seed the damn thing. This way, the 7th best team in the West wouldn't be left out of the playoffs in favor of a dreadful 6th seed from the East. That way, an East team whose PSAC record would place them third in the West wouldn't host while a deserving top seed from the West misses out on hosting rights for the semis and finals (not that it bothered IUP much when they'd win the PSAC in an East gym in the past, but still...)

    And, yes, I'm sick of seeing the "third-time" showdowns in the early rounds. Seems way too bland and predictable at times.
    Well, no way would Ship go along with a "pod" where IUP draws Clarion, Lock Haven, Mansfield and Shepherd while the Raiders get East Stroud, Kutztown, Millersville, and West Chester. Just sayin'.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Why is there a tournament? At most there should only be 4 teams left playing...the top two teams in each division.

    Then the top team overall with the best record should be hosting the whole thing.

    It should be IUP vs Walk On U in Game One
    It should be Shippensburg vs The Lake Show in Game Two.

    At IUP...

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    I'd be shocked if Gannon hired Reynolds since Gannon administration have publicly blasted him in his years at Rock.
    I agree, that ***** AD wouldn’t mesh with KR’s demeanor.

    Leave a comment:


  • ctrabs74
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


    I've always thought scrapping the East/West thing in the PSAC Tournament would be really cool -- i.e. the PSAC gets seeded for the tournament regardless of East/West association. We've seen numerous years where one side is far superior to the other (both ways). But, obviously with that comes the travel headache as our teams are so spaced out geographically.

    The other pro (my opinion) is you avoid some 'Round 3' games. For instance, I'd find it much more interesting as a fan to watch IUP play Millersville next Wednesday night instead of playing Seton Hill for the third time.

    I guess these are just some of the headaches with having 670 teams in the PSAC. LOL.

    I don't dislike the current format ... just talking out loud.

    I've often heard people question why the final -- since we love this East / West format -- isn't actually East vs. West. So many years we see a West vs West or East vs East final. But, in theory, that puts the two hottest teams up against each other. I remember 6-7 years ago when Ship beat IUP in OT at the KCAC on Final Four Saturday. Everybody in the league knew that was the actual final -- it just got played a day early.
    You pretty much took the words right out of my mouth. I can't help but think that it's time for the PSAC to ditch the divisions bit and follow the lead of, well, pretty much every Power Five basketball conference and get rid of divisions (each Big 12 team plays home-and-home, though that ends next season with the addition of four schools; ACC, SEC, B1G play 3-4 set opponents home-and-home then everyone else once; PAC-12 teams play nine home-and-home sets with single games against the remaining two schools).

    When the PSAC originally expanded to 18 teams, there was talk for going to a three-division format with home-and-home divisional games (10) and single games against the other two divisions (6 games x 2 divisions = 12) to keep the 22 game format in place. Unfortunately, we're stuck with the current scheme for god knows how long, but it's long overdue for an overhaul, even if the coaches have to buy into it kicking and screaming.

    You can keep the three-division scheme, but as "pods" rather than fixed divisions:

    West: Cal, Edinboro, Gannon, Mercyhurst, Seton Hill, Slippery Rock
    Central-ish: Clarion, IUP, Lock Haven, Mansfield, Shepherd, UPJ
    East: Bloomsburg, East Stroudsburg, Kutztown, Millersville, Shippensburg, West Chester

    Use the same 10-6-6 format as proposed in the three-division format and put everyone in a single division, take the 12 best teams overall and seed the damn thing. This way, the 7th best team in the West wouldn't be left out of the playoffs in favor of a dreadful 6th seed from the East. That way, an East team whose PSAC record would place them third in the West wouldn't host while a deserving top seed from the West misses out on hosting rights for the semis and finals (not that it bothered IUP much when they'd win the PSAC in an East gym in the past, but still...)

    And, yes, I'm sick of seeing the "third-time" showdowns in the early rounds. Seems way too bland and predictable at times.

    Leave a comment:


  • ctrabs74
    replied
    Originally posted by Scrub View Post

    The only reason the MEC's neutral site format works is that they've always chosen a "neutral" site within reach of multiple schools. Wheeling is in the backyard of WU & WLU. Charleston (former home of the MEC tourney) has UC and WVSU right there. That's the only thing that saves it from being an empty arena. If it were played in, say, Morgantown with no actual MEC school in reach, it would be pretty empty most of the weekend.
    Fairmont State is about a 25 minute drive up 79 to Hillbilly High in Morgantown.

    The problem for the PSAC is that the state is so dang big that anywhere other than Hershey would end up being unfair to the other corners of the state. If it were held in, say, Pittsburgh, teams like IUP, Rock, etc. would have stronger showings. If it were played in Philly, same for WCU et. al. State is too big for a middle-ground neutral site event I would guess. MEC pulls it off because no one is coming more than 3 hours anywhere you put it. And as you say, CIAA pulls it off because it's been a significant cultural event for generations, so it draws for reasons both relating to and unrelated to basketball.
    And then you have Hershey which is about an hour away from Kutztown and Shippensburg, and about 40 minutes away from Millersville, so you're going to get a lot of the same gripes about Hershey than you would for Philly or Pittsburgh. And considering the B1G regular season ends on the same weekend as the PSAC final four, there's no way that State Penn could (or would let) Bryce Jordan Arena host the PSAC (Rec Hall, maybe, if it still exists).

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by bballfan03 View Post

    I'd be shocked if Gannon hired Reynolds since Gannon administration have publicly blasted him in his years at Rock.
    Completely different administration now.

    Leave a comment:


  • EyeoftheHawk
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post

    Gary dropped the hammer
    Clearly Gannon didn’t want to be there. They just wanted the misery to end. What a disaster of a season.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPHawks24 View Post
    Did Mercyhurst really put 105 on Gannon? 17 3's?

    Long way from the 50-48 games of 5-10 years ago.
    Gary dropped the hammer

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPHawks24
    replied
    Did Mercyhurst really put 105 on Gannon? 17 3's?

    Long way from the 50-48 games of 5-10 years ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    We'll get an answer on Gannon & Jefferson once KR's season is done. I'll put a Levity or Noble Stein draft on it.
    I'd be shocked if Gannon hired Reynolds since Gannon administration have publicly blasted him in his years at Rock.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
    Portal Season starts Monday. Teams that don't make the conference tournament typically get blasted on Portal Monday.

    Specifically to the West, the two biggest questions looming are will the head coaches in Clarion and Gannon still be employed by Tuesday. If not, I could see mass departures from both programs.

    Personally, I think Jefferson losing at Edinboro wasn't the 'final nail' but, well, it slammed the coffin shut.

    I can tell you this, teams would be lining up to get a shot at a couple of Clarion's freshmen.
    I believe Gannon will lose a good number of players whether KJ stays or not. Didn't realize that Mims wasn't using his extra year and is done after this season...gonna take quite a bit to replace him.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Since the Centre County Community College is a succubus on PSSHE funding, they should offer the Jordan Center for free to the Pee Sack for a Pee Sack tournament. It’s not like any championship basketball ever gets played in there….

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X